Mashable

SAVE $600: As of Nov. 10, the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni is on sale for $699.99 at Amazon. That's 46% off the list price.

Opens in a new window Credit: Ecovacs Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni $699.99 at Amazon
$1,299.99 Save $600   Get Deal

Robot vacuum deals are always popular over busy shopping periods like Prime Day and Black Friday. We're already looking out for big discounts, and we're expecting a lot of offers to drop throughout the next few weeks. That being said, we might have already come across the best early Black Friday robot vacuum deal. It's certainly going to be tough to beat.

As of Nov. 10, the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni is on sale for $699.99 at Amazon. That's 46% off the list price and the best-ever price for this model. You could find the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni for over $800 over October Prime Day, so this price drop really is significant.

SEE ALSO: Score the Roborock Q7 M5+ robot vacuum and mop for its best-ever price ahead of Black Friday

There isn't much that this premium robot vacuum can't do. It vacuums, mops, and cleans itself, so there's not much for you to do. It offers strong performance on carpets and more effective removal of dust, pet hair, and debris. It also has anti-tangle brushes which prevent hair from wrapping around the rollers, making this a strong option for pet hair.

Score the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni robot vacuum for its lowest-ever price at Amazon.

SAVE $20: As of Nov. 10, the Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro is on sale for $79 at Amazon. That's the best-ever price for this popular smartwatch.

Opens in a new window Credit: Nothing Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro $79 at Amazon
$99 Save $20   Get Deal

The Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro was released in July 2025, and we've been shouting about it ever since. Seriously, we like this smartwatch a lot. In our review, we said it "looks, feels, and functions like a smartwatch that costs hundreds more." So we're even more impressed when you can pick up this impressive smartwatch for its best-ever price at Amazon.

As of Nov. 10, the Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro is on sale for $79 at Amazon. That's the best-ever price for this popular smartwatch according to camelcamelcamel. Every color is down to this record-low price, so pick from orange, ash grey, dark grey, and light green. I'm not going to point you in any particular direction, but damn that light green colorway looks great.

SEE ALSO: The Apple Watch SE is down to under $190 ahead of Black Friday

Mashable's reviewer praised the sleep tracking accuracy, battery life (nearly two weeks), dual-band GPS tracing for athletes, intuitive design, and advanced workout metrics. To get all of that and more for $79 feels unfair, but we're not complaining.

The only question is whether we'll see anything better as we approach Black Friday. Looking at the price history, this was the same price over October Prime Day. That tells us that we're unlikely to see anything better, so if you're interested, you should jump on this limited-time discount.

Score the Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro for under $80 at Amazon.

TL;DR: Save hundreds on a lifetime subscription to PromptBuilder’s AI prompt engineer tool that helps you build better prompts and get more out of AI.

Opens in a new window Credit: PromptBuilder PromptBuilder - AI Prompt Engineer: Lifetime Subscription (Unlimited Plan) $199
$1,764 Save $1,565   Get Deal

You know that moment when ChatGPT spits out something so off-base you wonder if it even read your message? It’s not that the AI is broken; it just needs clearer instructions.

PromptBuilder helps you bridge that gap, turning your half-formed thoughts into sharp, optimized prompts that deliver exactly what you meant. With it, you can stop wasting your time arguing back and forth with ChatGPT and get better outputs the first time around. Grab lifetime access now for $199 (reg. $1,764).

SEE ALSO: Lawsuits allege ChatGPT use led to suicide, psychosis

How PromptBuilder works for you:

Let’s say you’re a social media manager trying to come up with clever captions for a holiday campaign. Instead of typing vague requests like “write fun Instagram captions for Christmas,” open PromptBuilder:

1. Choose a ready-made template.

2. Add a few details about your brand, business, or what you want included. PromptBuilder translates it into a professional-grade prompt that works across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other top AI tools.

3. Boom — you’ll get better, brand-friendly options.

Or, maybe you’re a content creator experimenting with DALL-E or Stable Diffusion. You can get image prompts tailored to your ask without wasting your credits or tokens on outputs that are nowhere close to what you need.

Once you find prompts that work for you, make sure to save and organize them right within PromptBuilder so you never have to start from scratch again.

Get your PromptBuilder AI prompt engineering tool here for $199 (reg. $1,764).

StackSocial prices subject to change.

TL;DR: For a limited time, you can get a Headway Premium lifetime subscription on sale for $39.99 (reg. $299.95).

Opens in a new window Credit: Headway Headway Premium: Lifetime Subscription $39.99
$299.95 Save $259.96   Get Deal

If your ‘to be read’ (TBR) list keeps growing faster than your free time, Headway might be your new favorite app. It turns best-selling books into quick, engaging summaries you can finish in minutes. And right now, you can snag lifetime access at the lowest price we’ve ever seen.

Since you only have to pay once and not every month, you can enjoy the app at a relaxed pace. No need to feel like you’re ‘wasting money’ if you take a day away.

SEE ALSO: Apple's iPhone might soon be able to send photos via satellite connection

Inside the Headway app, you’ll find summaries of titles in productivity, business, self-improvement, psychology, and more. You can also opt for the audio option if you’d rather listen to them while commuting or cleaning up around the house.

The app also includes personalized learning paths and spaced repetition tools, which can be useful if you’re trying to build new habits or retain key concepts from books.

This kind of reading isn’t for everyone — it won’t replace the depth of a full book or the joy of leisurely reading. But if your TBR list is longer than your calendar allows, or you’re looking for a way to sample a book before committing, it could be a time-saver.

And while there are other book summary apps out there, many charge ongoing monthly fees or limit content without a subscription. With Headway, you’re getting full access for life, for less than what most platforms charge in a single year.

Get your Headway lifetime subscription now while it’s still $39.99 (reg. $299.99). No coupon is needed to get this price.

StackSocial prices subject to change.

The generative AI bubble may or may not be about to burst, but the technology could still be a game changer for organizations around the world. And, according to recent data, nonprofit organizations are still trying to hop onto the AI wave.

SEE ALSO: Lawsuits allege ChatGPT use led to suicide, psychosis A majority of nonprofits are interested in AI 

Compared to other tech-forward spaces, the nonprofit industry has been much more hesitant to dive into AI and its pitch of humanless efficiency. Broadly, nonprofits have been slower to adopt AI as a universal helper or to deeply integrate it into their work, keeping AI segmented away from public work. 

But as the tech has evolved — and in some ways acquiesced to the concerns of privacy experts and tech watchdogs  — nonprofit leaders are more eager to accept AI's offer to help. It may soon become necessary.

In addition to historic funding and infrastructure barriers, American-based nonprofits are weathering new attacks on federal funding sources under the Trump administration. Federal leaders have resorted to intimidating organizations, questioning their motives as part of the administration's "anti-woke" agenda, which now extends to the country's AI innovations. In August, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that directed agencies to rewrite grant making policies for 501(c)(3) organizations, allowing agencies to terminate funding if it doesn't "advance the national interest."

Meanwhile, a 2025 report by Candid, the global nonprofit fundraising platform, found that 65 percent of nonprofits expressed interest in AI. Most nonprofits communicated being at a "beginner familiarity" with the tech. A recent survey by social good software provider Bonterra found more than half of its partner nonprofits had already adopted AI in some form, and a majority said they were interested in using it soon.

Tech nonprofit organization Fast Forward, with support from Google's philanthropic arm Google.org, recently surveyed more than 200 nonprofits that had already adopted AI in their work. The report showed that smaller organizations (less than 10 employees) were utilizing the tech the most, starting with their own chatbots and custom LLMs trained on public data. Most implemented it only in internal operations — and had been using AI for less than a year. 

Guidance on AI safety and responsibility is still a major problem

While interest and adoption has grown, AI developers and tech funders haven't kept up with the needs of nonprofits. Organizations still navigate major gaps in training, resources, and policies that preclude AI's effectiveness in their work. Candid found that only 9 percent of nonprofits feel ready to adopt AI responsibly, and a third couldn't articulate a connection between AI tech and accomplishing their organization's mission. 

Half of the organizations were worried that adopting AI could exacerbate inequalities that they themselves address within their work, especially among those serving BIPOC communities and people with disabilities. "Folks hold the desire to explore and to understand," wrote Candid in its findings, "but the support systems have not caught up."

These concerns were also expressed among nonprofits that have already adopted AI. Bonterra's survey found that nearly all nonprofits were worried about how AI companies could use their data. A third of the nonprofits said unresolved questions about bias, privacy, and security are actively limiting how they use it.

"With AI adoption on the rise, it’s critical for organizations to remember to prioritize people over data points. AI should be used to support a nonprofit's mission, not the other way around. For nonprofits and funders, this means that AI adoption must take on a people-first perspective that is grounded in transparency, accountability, and integrity," Bonterra CEO Scott Brighton told Mashable. "Social good wants to use AI ethically, and that means giving them guidance on how to approach data collection, ensuring human oversight over all decisions, and protecting private information."

Surveys have shown that very few nonprofits have internal AI training budgets, internal policies, or guidance for the organization's use of AI, most often due to a lack of infrastructure to sustain them. Nonprofits also expressed concern over the potential impact of automation on their work, high costs, and the lack of training resources for already overburdened staff — concerns that have existed for years as AI has become mainstream. 

"The reality is that nonprofits can only do what funders allow them to do within their budgets," explained Fast Forward co-founder Shannon Farley. "Funders play an important role in helping to make sure nonprofits have the funding to prioritize AI equity and accountability."

Especially at the smallest level, nonprofits are still being cautious about AI — and deferring to their communities in its implementation. Fast Forward found that 70 percent of nonprofits "powered" by AI used community feedback to build their AI tools and policies as government regulation lags.

"At the end of the day, nonprofits don’t care about AI, they care about impact," said Fast Forward co-founder Kevin Barenblat. "Nonprofits have always looked for ways to do more with less — AI is unlocking the how."

WATCH MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL FOR $5: Sling TV offers no-strings day passes for various channels, including ESPN, getting you 24-hour access to stream ESPN-exclusive MNF. You can also bump the pass up to a full weekend for $9.99 or a full week for $14.99.

Opens in a new window Credit: Sling Sling TV temporary streaming passes Starting at $4.99/day Learn More

The ongoing drama between Disney and YouTube TV is interrupting the second week of Monday Night Football in a row. As a birds fan, this was hitting close to home as my household scrambled to find an alternate way to watch the Eagles vs. Packers game on Nov. 10. I found a hack that doesn't involve starting a trial of a different live TV streaming service, and doesn't involve going to a bar where it'll be on TV: A $4.99 Sling TV day pass for ESPN.

Sling TV offers short-term passes for a variety of channels in its Sling Orange package, from AMC, Lifetime, and Freeform to ESPN, ESPN 2, and ESPN 3. You can pay $4.99 for 24-hour access, $9.99 for weekend access, or $14.99 for access for an entire week. This wouldn't be cost-efficient to keep up on a regular basis, but it's a clutch option to tide YouTube TV subscribers over until it's (hopefully) able to bring back Disney-owned networks. You'll have to create a Sling TV account for a day pass, but no recurring payments are involved.

SEE ALSO: What's new to streaming this week? (Nov. 7, 2025)

Disney hates this, of course. The company sued Sling TV at the end of August when the short-term pass system was announced, because why would we make it easy for viewers to watch a singular football game or two? In the meantime, temporary ESPN passes are still alive and well on Sling's website.

YouTube TV is offering subscribers $20 as an inconvenience fee of sorts, which is nice, I guess... but it still doesn't help sports fans trying to watch an important game on ESPN.

A Sling TV day pass won't unlock NFL games on other days, as Thursday Night Football is strictly on Prime and NFL Sundays fall under NBC and your local FOX broadcast zone. But temporary access to ESPN would unlock several NBA games throughout the week, if you're sorely missing those, too.

When the NBA betting scandal broke last month and numerous players and a coach were arrested, it put a spotlight on the ever-present culture of sports wagering. 

One NBA player, Chicago Bulls center Nikola Vucevic, singled out a specific type of bet as a symptom of a broader, arguably negative shift — the parlay. 

This wager, a multi-leg bet that pays out only when a gambler correctly predicts a series of outcomes, is supposed to be a fun way for sports fans to use their intricate knowledge of players and teams, according to the industry.

Imagine, for example, a parlay consisting of the reigning NBA champions Oklahoma City Thunder winning their game, a specific over/under on that game, as well as a point spread, and the team's all-star guard/forward Jalen Williams scoring at least 10 points after returning from injury.

SEE ALSO: Legal gambling has kind of ruined sports

This may sound entertaining, but some gamblers have a lot riding on their parlays. Even though the wagers are typically small sums and the odds are often long, desperate consumers may place them to chase their losses. Since gamblers can place parlay bets while a live sporting event is underway, some get carried away and make numerous wagers in quick succession. 

Experts who study the psychology of gambling say that parlays can be a particularly risky type of bet. Consumers who believe their deep sports knowledge gives them a winning advantage aren't discouraged by, or don't fully grasp, plainly stated odds. Instead, they imagine statistically improbable scenarios. 

SEE ALSO: Is online gambling contributing to Vegas' problems?

They often continue betting anyway, especially during a live game, sometimes at the invitation of their preferred gambling app's push notifications. Emotions run high and hope springs eternal. 

"In that situation, sports betting becomes more like slot machines, where you can immediately get another bet down just by pushing another button," says Brad Humphreys, a professor of economics at West Virginia University. 

Vucevic knows firsthand how seriously some people take parlays, because they tell him. 

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

"As players, we feel it when we step onto the court," Vucevic said, according to Chicago Sports Network reporter K.C. Johnson. "Before you used to hear, 'Hey, Vooch, get a win.' Now it's like, 'Hey, my parlay is 10 rebounds.'"

Don't expect to hit it big with a parlay

Humphreys understands why parlay wagers are so appealing — to both gamblers and the online sports betting industry. 

Parlays have been around for decades, particularly in horse racing. However, the advent of online sports betting apps has made parlays popular with mainstream sports fans. They often feature prop bets, or wagers placed on an individual's or team's performance. The prospect of a series of bets all hitting in the same game, or across multiple games, can be tantalizing. 

But that gets harder to achieve with each added leg. That's why they're so lucrative for gambling operators: Betting on a parlay can be the equivalent of buying a lottery ticket, odds-wise. The house is almost certain to win, but not without first offering a $1,000 payout for a $1 wager. 

Joe Maloney, senior vice president of strategic communications for the American Gaming Association, which represents industry members like DraftKings and FanDuel, says the popularity of the parlay grows out of an American tradition of cheering for superstars as a form of fandom.

Plus, there are are sports fans who feels "empowered" by their knowledge of how a favorite player performs or a certain game is played and bets accordingly, Maloney says. 

Still, Maloney emphasizes that parlay betting should not be viewed as a "wealth creation or an investment vehicle." 

Instead, consumers should think of the parlay as a form of entertainment. Maloney also recommends that consumers take advantage of opportunities to understand how parlay odds work. The American Gaming Association has two websites dedicated to their consumer education initiatives, Have A Game Plan and Play Smart From The Start.

Even former NBA star Charles Barkley, who partnered with FanDuel to promote parlay bets, lost 21 wagers until he finally won in June of this year. Previously, Barkley got caught on TV incorrectly calculating the potential winnings for a parlay he promoted. 

Barkley celebrated his victory with a dance on his TNT broadcast, which became the subject of an NBA subreddit thread. The first comment pointed out what experts say many fans overlook: "Goes to show how hard parlays are, 0-21 prior." 

Cory Fox, FanDuel's senior vice president of public policy and sustainability, told Mashable that parlays "offer customers an engaging way to follow games with multiple outcomes to cheer for." 

On FanDuel, 90 percent of same-game parlays have a wager of $30 or less, according to the company. Sixty percent are $5 or less. 

The app's Sportsbook 101 feature also educates customers on how parlay odds work. Fox added that FanDuel condemns abusive behavior directed toward athletes, and that users will be banned if they're found to be harassing them. 

How to approach parlay bets

Dr. Philip Newall, who studies gambling psychology as a lecturer at the UK's University of Bristol, says parlays offer bookmakers enticing profit margins — as high as 75 percent, according to one of his studies — and says they are critical to the gaming industry's bottom line. DraftKings' second quarter financial report for 2025, for example, notes that its parlay business grew significantly year-over-year.

"[With] the average amount of money you're keeping per dollar bet, clearly you want to nudge people toward making lots of bets," Newall says. "The longer odds the bet is, the higher the margin will be." 

Alexander Connolly, a Ph.D. student in clinical psychology who studies gambling behaviors at the University of New Mexico, says online sportsbooks push parlays "pretty strongly." 

Connolly believes that sports gambling can be fun for some people, but very dangerous for others. He warns against chasing losses in general, but especially via parlays. While the bets may seem small in contrast to big-money wagers, they remain statistical long shots and can rapidly add up. 

Connolly says that while researchers are trying to understand consumer parlay behavior and the problems that can result, it remains an understudied topic.

In general, Connolly notes that people typically don't know their wins and losses, obscuring what could be a problem gambling habit. He recommends consumers take a mindful approach to parlays. They might ask themselves, "Why am I doing this? Is this for fun?"

Healthy betting, for example, would be spending money on a bet the consumer otherwise use to see a movie. But trying to win big — or win back losses — indicates risky behavior. 

Gamblers shouldn't overestimate their sports knowledge, either, Connolly says. Understanding sports statistics isn't insurance against flukes and chance. 

"Sports are just too random," Connolly says. "Even the best teams of all time typically lose once in a while."

If you or someone you know is struggling with gambling, help is available 24/7 through the National Problem Gambling Helpline. Connect with a trained professional who can guide you to local resources by calling 1-800-522-4700, texting 800GAM, or chatting online at https://www.ncpgambling.org/chat.

Over the weekend, the conservative media outlet The Blaze and journalist Steve Baker accused a former Capitol police officer of being the prime suspect in the unsolved Jan. 6 pipe bomb incident. The report instantly sent shockwaves through right-wing media, leading to a frenzy of conspiracy theories and calls for the individual's immediate arrest. 

The Blaze also accused the person of being part of a vast government conspiracy. In hyping up his report on X, Baker wrote, "This might just be the biggest scandal and conspiracy in American history."

Mashable is not sharing the name of the person the Blaze identified as the alleged pipe bombing suspect, as the outlet has not yet presented conclusive evidence for their claims, nor have federal authorities confirmed they are investigating the former officer.

In fact, The Blaze’s report primarily rests on a little-known forensic tool called gait analysis. So, what is gait analysis, and how reliable is it? Can it be used to positively identify a person?

What is gait analysis? Understanding a forensic tool with a long history.

Gait refers to an individual’s style of walking, running, and moving. The study of gait dates back to Aristotle, and in modern times, gait analysis has been used as evidence in criminal justice since at least 1839, according to the American Bar Association. More recently, software and artificial intelligence have allowed investigators to conduct much more detailed gait analysis.

The Blaze says that it arranged a forensic gait analysis of the individual in question for its report. Per The Blaze, "The source who did the comparison said the software rated the match at 94%." However, The Blaze did not identify the individual who performed the analysis or the tools they used.

The Blaze’s analysis compared a surveillance video of the pipe bomber with footage of the alleged suspect at a soccer game in 2017. Strangely, The Blaze did not use the famous videos of the bomber released by the FBI, which show an unknown individual in a mask and gray hoodie placing bombs near both the Democratic and Republic National Committee offices in Washington, D.C. Instead, Baker wrote that the analysis used a video from "another source" that shows the same scene.

The Blaze said that it used a “software algorithm that analyzes walking parameters including flexion (knee bend), hip extension, speed, step length, cadence, and variance.” This is the tool that provided a 94 percent match.

So, is gait analysis reliable enough to provide a positive identification, absent other evidence? 

Not quite. 

The American Bar Association states that gait analysis can be used as “corroborating evidence” and a “contributing factor in the identification process.” In addition, the ABA also states that "precise individualization of a person’s gait has yet to be fully scientifically proved.” That means gait analysis likely would not be sufficient evidence to convict someone in a criminal case, unlike DNA evidence.

Not only can gait analysis produce false positives, but one study also pegged its accuracy at just 71 percent, according to a paper published with The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences in 2019. That paper also states that the "potential uniqueness of gait has yet to be proven."

In short, even if The Blaze has correctly identified the alleged pipe bombing suspect, they have not yet provided conclusive evidence of that fact.

Usually, a media outlet would demand more than 94 percent certainty before claiming they’ve uncovered "the biggest scandal and conspiracy in American history."

On Nov. 4, Zohran Mamdani won the New York City mayoral election, with campaign promises like a rent freeze and fast and free buses. He gave hope to New Yorkers across the city — as well as inadvertently giving hope to daters.

Mamdani met his wife, animator and illustrator Rama Duwaji, on Hinge in 2021, and they married in February. (Hinge doesn't typically comment on public figures' personal relationships, the app told Mashable.) In the days since Mamdani's win, some have taken to social media to share their hope to find their future partner in a similar fashion. Others, though, are lamenting that they haven't found their own leftist, smiling mayoral winner, and likely won't, because the app "isn't the same" as it was four years ago.

SEE ALSO: As Tinder struggles to attract paid users, one dating app is gaining popularity

"This can't be the same Hinge Zohran met his wife on," X user @dfarecs posted last week.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

The feeling is shared on TikTok, with videos and comments flooding the app proclaiming that there's no way Mamdani and his wife "met on the same Hinge app I'm using," and that "Hinge was peak 2021-2023 it fell off." 

But the shared feeling that the apps are decaying isn't new. In response to @dfarecs's post, a 2023 video from comedian Keara Sullivan about this began recirculating on X. "If you're someone who met their partner off a dating app at any point in the last year-and-a-half, two years, just know that you caught the last chopper out of [Vietnam]," she said. 

Sullivan wasn't talking about Hinge specifically, but rather apps in general. But she insisted that singles were "in the trenches," and that she didn't know what changed in the last year, but friends of all genders weren't having luck on these platforms. 

That video, with 4.5 million views, is two years old, but the sentiment has only seemed to permeate popular opinion since then. Dating apps boomed in 2020 thanks to worldwide lockdowns, but in the five years since, the experience of using them — just like the experience of being online generally — has shifted, and many say for the worse.

Tinder and Hinge both launched in 2012 (and their parent company, Match Group, merged with Tinder in 2017 and acquired Hinge in 2018). Over a decade on, the apps have lost their novelty with daters. In a Mashable story earlier this year about whether AI features are good for dating apps, sexologist, sociologist, and relationship expert Dr. Jennifer Gunsaullus broke down several reasons for this:

• Swipe fatigue: a buzzphrase, but daters do really feel this. "Dating" with your thumb, scrolling through profile after profile, can get exhausting — especially when you're not seeing results. 

• The paradox of choice: With an abundance of potential matches, it becomes hard to pick just one.

• Superficial snap judgments: Deciding whether to go on a date with someone based on a few photos and a bio, maybe some prompt responses.

• Bad behavior like ghosting.

Trust in these apps has also declined. Daters who have been on apps for years have seen features they used to enjoy for free now paywalled, and other features that were once unique to one app are now globbed onto others.

This distrust has translated into lawsuits and government action. Last year, a class-action lawsuit against Match Group (that's since gone to arbitration) claimed that the apps are "addictive" and "predatory," prioritizing making money over matches. In September, two senators wrote a letter to Match's CEO compelling the company to take action against romance scams.

Hinge itself recognizes the evolving needs of daters and the challenges they face, and gathers feedback from daters and community partners to better understand. Those insights inspire new features. This year, for example, Hinge launched AI-driven prompt feedback and new prompts created in collaboration with psychotherapist Esther Perel, driven by user frustration about profiles sounding the same and blending together. And in response to lack of responsiveness and conversations fizzling — another big dating app gripe — Hinge introduced a cap on unanswered messages.

SEE ALSO: The best sexting apps for discreet NSFW chats

Still, there are reasons beyond the platforms themselves that contribute to the malaise of dating. Young women are increasingly liberal, while young men are increasingly conservative, which could make finding someone who shares the same values difficult. The job market is poor, and the increasing cost of living has impacted how people date; they may not want to settle down in a state of financial insecurity. 

Meanwhile, the rise of AI has led to people using chatbots to date for them — if not choosing to date a chatbot full-stop. And as some people fall for LLMs, others want to remove tech from dating entirely and meet someone in person. 

Tinder has taken a financial hit as of late, perhaps due to these mounting issues. Its direct revenue is down 3 percent year-over-year, and its paying users are down 7 percent year-over-year, according to Match's quarter three earnings report. Bumble shared a similar story in its third-quarter earnings: total revenue is down 10 percent year over year, and total paying users 16 percent in the same time frame.

Ironically, Hinge is soaring financially. Its direct revenue increased 27 percent, and paying users increased 17 percent, both year-over-year. So despite social media's complaints, people are still looking for love on that app. Whether they'll find a future mayor to marry, however, is uncertain.

We're only a few months away from The Pitt's Season 2 premiere in January 2026, so there's no better time than now to watch (or rewatch) the Emmy-winning drama.

SEE ALSO: 'The Pitt' review: Noah Wyle medical drama is part 'ER,' part '24,' and all compelling

The series takes viewers inside one 15-hour-long shift in a Pittsburgh emergency department, where an ensemble of healthcare workers, led by Dr. Michael "Robby" Robinavitch (Noah Wyle), work hard to provide care for their patients. Their day plays out in real time, with each episode representing one hour of the shift. The result is a gripping window into the ailing American healthcare system, tackling sensitive topics like abortion and gun violence, and also featuring deeply realistic depictions of medical procedures. The Pitt became a smash hit on HBO Max and went on to win Emmys for Outstanding Drama Series, Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series (Wyle), and Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series (Katherina LaNasa).

And now, if you don't have an HBO Max subscription, you're in luck! This December, there's a new way to get in on The Pitt action,

Starting Dec. 1, The Pitt will be airing Mondays at 9 p.m. ET/PT on TNT. The episodes will air in batches of three back-to-back episodes, ending with the final batch on Monday, Dec. 29. According to a press release from TNT, the network will be broadcasting The Pitt as it aired on HBO Max, meaning none of the show's more graphic medical imagery or nudity will be removed.

You can watch The Pitt on TNT with basic cable. You can also watch TNT through a variety of live TV streaming services, including Hulu + Live TV, Sling TV, and YouTube TV.

DIRECTV Save Up to $505 Over 2 Years With Qualifying Packages at DIRECTV
  See It at DIRECTV Hulu + Live TV $74.99 Per Month at Hulu
  See It at Hulu Sling TV Get a Day Pass for $4.99 and Watch Live Sports, News, and Top Entertainment at Sling TV
  See It at Sling TV See It at Sling TV See It at Sling TV YouTube TV $82.99 at YouTube TV
  See It at YouTube TV

The Pitt is now streaming on HBO Max.

This summer, TV audiences went wild for The Summer I Turned Pretty. The third and final season of the popular teen drama had everyone asking, "Are you Team Conrad or Team Jeremiah?"

But once Belly (Lola Tung) made her final decision between the two Fisher brothers (Christopher Briney and Gavin Casalegno), the main question on every fan's minds switched to "What in the world do we watch now?" (Besides the upcoming movie, of course.)

SEE ALSO: Why Conrad from 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' is the internet’s ultimate summer crush

The answer, it seems, is another Prime Video teen drama: the German-language series Maxton Hall — The World Between Us. The first three episodes of Maxton Hall Season 2 dropped Nov. 7. Since then, the show has topped Prime Video's streaming charts, unseating The Summer I Turned Pretty as the streamer's current-trending teen romance. As of writing this, it's the #2 title on Prime Video, behind Tyler Perry's new movie Finding Joy, and the #1 TV series.

Based on the book series by Mona Kasten, Maxton Hall transports audiences to its titular boarding school, a majestic castle with an exorbitantly wealthy student body. Enter Ruby Bell (Harriet Herbig-Matten), a scholarship student determined to use Maxton Hall as a stepping stone to Oxford University, even as her classmates spend their days partying and reveling in their families' vast fortunes.

When Ruby uncovers a scandal at Maxton Hall, she finds herself in close contact with James Beaufort (Damian Hardung). He's the ultra-privileged heir of the Beaufort family, yet Ruby soon learns there are hidden depths to him. This being a teen romance, it's not long before the two fall in love, even as those around them try to pull them apart.

Maxton Hall doesn't have the brotherly love triangle shenanigans of The Summer I Turned Pretty. (For more of that, I'd suggest Netflix's My Life with the Walter Boys.) However, there are enough similarities between the two to suggest that Maxton Hall will be filling the void The Summer I Turned Pretty's finale left behind.

Don’t miss out on our latest stories: Add Mashable as a trusted news source in Google.

For starters, Ruby and James' enemies-to-lovers arc recalls the more contentious dynamic between Belly and Conrad in The Summer I Turned Pretty's first season. (Minus the childhood pining, that is.) In Season 2, James' struggles with his mental health and grief also mirror Conrad's own internal journey, especially as the pair both suffer an intense familial loss.

However, as James spirals following this loss, he makes a much more Jeremiah-like move. Remember Jeremiah's infamous trip to Cabo, where he cheated on Belly? (Honestly, who could forget, aside from Belly when she decides to get engaged to him anyway? But I digress.) Well, James doesn't even need the distance of a spring break trip to cheat on Ruby, doing so right in front of her in the Season 2 premiere! Since then, he's been taking steps to make it up to her, but the angst is still piping hot.

The angst of it all is enough to keep viewers pouring back into Maxton Hall week after week, yearning to know what's next for Ruby and James. But like any teen drama, Maxton Hall explores its characters' ambitions and challenges beyond their main romance, from Ruby's university dreams and James' grief to the classism of the institution where they met. That's a lot for teen drama fans to sink their teeth into, and it means that while The Summer I Turned Pretty summer is fully over, you can always get into Maxton Hall fall.

Maxton Hall — The World Between Us Season 2 is now streaming on Prime Video, with new episodes every Friday.

If you've ever had to rent a car, you're probably familiar with some of the big car rental companies out there: Hertz, Enterprise, Budget, and…Tesla?

Tesla is now getting into the car rental business, according to a new report from EV news outlet Electrek.

The company is renting out vehicles in at least two locations in Southern California, one in San Diego and one in Costa Mesa. However, Tesla is reportedly planning to expand its rent-a-car service to even more locations across the country.

Elon Musk's EV car company is offering rentals starting at $60 per day, with a minimum rental of three days and a maximum rental of seven days. The price also depends on which model of Tesla you're looking to rent. Tesla is including free car charging at Supercharging locations and supervised Full Self-Driving at not cost with the rental.

If a customer falls in love with their Tesla rental and decides to buy a vehicle, they will receive a $250 credit if a purchase is made within one week of the rental.

Tesla is hoping to accomplish a few things with this rental car program. For one, those freebies and purchasing incentives are clearly an attempt to get people behind the wheel of a Tesla in hopes that they end up purchasing a vehicle. 

In addition to that, Tesla's sales have struggled over the past year, largely thanks to a combination of factors like general EV demand and Musk's connection to the Trump administration. Tesla is also now dealing with the expiration of the federal tax credit for EV purchases, which will likely put a further dent in their sales numbers.

However, as Electrek points out, companies like Hertz have seemingly been getting out of the Tesla rental business. The rental company has been selling their fleet of vehicles as resale values for Teslas have plummeted. With those previously mentioned factors still in play, Tesla may also see an opening for the company to ditch the middlemen in the rental car business, and just open up a revenue stream by offering rentals itself. 

UPDATE Monday, 2:51 p.m. ET: Slack's problems on Monday appear to be resolving. User-reported issues on Downdetector had fallen precipitously from their earlier peak.

Slack's status page indicates that it has identified and begun fixing the issue. "Our work on this issue is still ongoing, and our health metrics continue to indicate improvement," reads its most recent update.

Thousands of people reported errors connecting to Slack around 1 p.m. ET on Monday, Nov. 10. Slack is a popular message platform in the corporate world, and the outage caused big problems for users starting their workweek.

Like many news outlets, Mashable reporters use Slack to communicate, and multiple members of the Mashable team reported receiving errors when trying to send new messages on Monday.

User error reports for Slack spiked on Monday afternoon on the platform Downdetector, with more than 15,000 incidents reported in just minutes. The initial spike started around 12:56 p.m. ET. (Disclosure: Downdetector and Mashable are both owned by the company Ziff Davis.)

SEE ALSO: Is Slack down? User errors point to outage at the messaging app.

According to a Slack status page, the company was investigating a "new incident."

At 1:26 p.m. ET, the company posted the following message: "Some users may have trouble connecting to or loading Slack. We'll provide an update within 30 minutes, including further details on current actions being taken."

As of this writing, Mashable reporters are able to connect to Slack, suggesting the outage may already be over for many users.

This is a developing story, and we'll provide updates as new information becomes available.

Funko, the company behind the ubiquitous collectibles that defined mid-2010s geek fandom, is facing serious financial trouble, according to its latest SEC filings.

In documents filed on Nov. 6, Funko raised "substantial doubt" about its ability to continue operating over the next 12 months. The report, which covers the third quarter ending Sept. 30, reveals mounting debt that the company attributes to a “challenging retail environment” — fallout from U.S. tariffs on imports from many countries.

SEE ALSO: People with disabilities are 'eating the cost' of tariffs

While Funko has secured some loan relief, it remains uncertain whether it can meet the conditions of its loan agreements. To stay afloat, the company may need to raise additional capital, renegotiate its loans, or risk default.

Even with global and domestic sales dropping 14.3 percent and 20.1 percent year-over-year for the third quarter, there are a few bright spots. Funko reports strong sales for its Bitty POP! line, plans to expand its blind box offerings, and is set to be one of the few companies selling KPop Demon Hunters merchandise this holiday season.

Still, the broader picture looks grim. Many of Funko’s struggles in the filing are attributed to the ongoing U.S. tariffs — now being challenged before the Supreme Court — that have strained retailers. With stores scaling back or outright canceling restocks amid a weakening economy, Funko’s future remains uncertain.

Apple is rumored to be removing the Dynamic Island cutout, replacing it with an under-display camera. In other words, Apple might be going with a clean, all-screen look for its display.

Apple-focused tech site MacRumors reported on Monday that rumors suggest the 20th anniversary iPhone in 2027 could conceal the front-facing camera and have no visible cutouts on the screen. It's worth noting that these rumors come from anonymous leakers, so there remains reason to be skeptical. And it's a long time until 2027, so plans could always change.

SEE ALSO: The 20th anniversary iPhone model could have an 'all-screen' design

But this is not the first time we've heard this rumor. There were reports back in May that the 20th anniversary iPhone could have an all-screen display. The iPhone certainly wouldn't be the first phone to cram tech under the display, but it would mark a major change in how the devices would appear and operate.

By 2027, the iPhone could have a totally new look.

SAVE $37: A like-new Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (16GB) is on sale for $106.99, down from the list price of $143.99. That's a 26% discount that matches the lowest we've ever seen at Amazon.

Opens in a new window Credit: Amazon Like-new Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (16GB) $106.99 at Amazon
$143.99 Save $37.00   Get Deal

Black Friday is coming up, which means the holiday rush is truly about to begin. If you prefer to shop early and then ignore the chaos, maybe you also want some quiet reading time. If you've been eyeing upgrading to a Kindle but haven't made the move yet, now might be a great time thanks to this deal.

As of Nov. 10, a like-new Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (16GB) is on sale at Amazon for $106.99, marked down from the usual price of $143.99. That's a 26% discount that shaves $37 off the price. It also matches the record-low on the refurbished model.

Tested by Amazon to be fully-functional with updated software, snagging a refurbished Kindle is a great way to get into e-books for less. Today's refurb deal applies to the latest Kindle Paperwhite model with 16GB of storage — enough space for thousands of downloaded books.

SEE ALSO: Kobo is getting a cool new accessory — a remote for your e-reader (updated)

Aside from the stunning Paperwhite display, which is one aspect that makes it Mashable's favorite Kindle, it has a wildly impressive battery of up to 12 weeks. That means you can possibly go three months before needing to recharge your e-reader.

It's a travel-worthy device, too. It's lightweight and compact and it's water resistant. That means you can invite it along to a pool-side vacation and not worry about damage. Plus, the Paperwhite is great for reading in full sunlight thanks to the glare-free display.

This refurbished Kindle Paperwhite comes with the same warranty as a new model, and Amazon tests each Kindle to be in like-new condition. The only major difference will be the savings.

While it's back at $106.99, a price that matches the record-low, upgrade your winter reading session with the Kindle Paperwhite. It's worthy of reading on the couch, in bed, during a bath, and it's perfect for upcoming holiday travel.

Nintendo is typically very good at keeping things under wraps and preventing leaks, but that might be harder to do now that it's making billion-dollar Hollywood movies.

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie releases in April 2026, but aside from a quick teaser trailer, we haven't seen much of it yet. It's not a surprise that the sequel to 2023's The Super Mario Bros. Movie would feature Yoshi, Mario's green dinosaur friend, as it was teased in a post-credits scene in the first movie.

However, a box for a Pillsbury product promoting the movie (sugar cookies resembling Yoshi eggs) appeared on the Tops Market website. On that box, you can see what seems to be Yoshi’s appearance in the film, though it hasn’t been officially revealed yet through a trailer or other promotional material.

SEE ALSO: Nintendo is about to retire the OG Switch This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

As you can see, Yoshi’s design here closely resembles his look from the modern Mario games. The main clue that this is connected to the new movie is the Mario flying behind Yoshi on the box — it’s clearly Chris Pratt's animated version of the character. That, and the fact that the product is heavily Galaxy-themed, which would be odd unless it were tied to the upcoming film based on the 2007 game. As a bonus, there’s even a small Bowser Jr. tease on the back of the box.

Now I kinda want to try those cookies.

Apple has removed top Chinese gay dating apps Blued and Finka from the country's App Store, WIRED has reported.

Apple received a government order to remove the apps. "We follow the laws in the countries where we operate. Based on an order from the Cyberspace Administration of China, we have removed these two apps from the China storefront only," an Apple spokesperson told WIRED in an email. "Earlier this year, the developer of Finka elected to remove the app from storefronts outside of China, and Blued was available only in China."

SEE ALSO: The best gay dating apps of 2025: Grindr is still king, even if we wish it weren't

Blued and Finka, which are owned by the same parent company, BlueCity, have also reportedly been removed from several Android stores. Users who have already downloaded the apps can still use them, according to WIRED.

Blued launched in 2012 and had 60 million registered users worldwide as of 2021. It was a location-based dating and livestreaming service for gay and bisexual men, Rest of World reported that year, and was originally a Chinese-language copy of the American gay dating app Jack'd. Finka, meanwhile, is a social network for younger gay and bisexual men, and BlueCity acquired it in 2020. Blued is branded as HeeSay internationally.

This is part of the Chinese government's increasing crackdown on LGBTQ content and advocacy groups in recent years. While public acceptance of LGBTQ people has grown in China, according to Human Rights Watch, there's increased government repression and censorship. Same-sex marriage isn't legal in China.

Grindr is already delisted in China's App Store, meaning that it's unsearchable there. According to the 2021 Rest of World article, the reason that BlueCity was able to function in China was at least in part because it offered sexual health services such as HIV testing. But in 2022, founder Ma Baoli stepped down as CEO and hinted at how difficult it was to operate an LGBTQ business in China.

SAVE OVER $60: As of Nov. 10, the Apple MacBook Pro (M5, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD) is on sale for $1,538 at Amazon. That's a saving of over $60 on list price.

Opens in a new window Credit: Apple Apple MacBook Pro (M5, 16GB RAM, 256GB SSD) $1,538 at Amazon
$1,599 Save $61   Get Deal

We're all on the lookout for Apple deals are we approach the busiest shopping season of the year. We're already seen some signs of things to come, but the big wave of deals hasn't come just yet. We're not overwhelmed at this early stage, but we are suitably impressed by the latest discount on the brand-new M5 MacBook Pro.

As of Nov. 10, the Apple MacBook Pro (M5, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD) is on sale for $1,538 at Amazon. That's a saving of over $60 on the regular price of $1,599.

SEE ALSO: The Apple Watch SE is down to under $190 ahead of Black Friday

Does everyone need a MacBook Pro M5? Absolutely not. I use my laptop for editing words, flicking between the same 10-15 tabs, and playing too much Football Manager at the weekend. Mashable tech editor Timothy Beck Werth recommends this model for "professionals, AI enthusiasts, and creators." If that sounds like you, this deal is worth checking out.

The M5 MacBook Pro is our latest Mashable Choice Award winner. The cheaper M4 MacBook Air is still the top choice for most people, but the M5 delivers a brighter mini-LED display with a better 120Hz refresh rate, improved sound, and a better mix of ports that include an HDMI port and an SDXC card slot. If you have the budget, the upgrade is very much worth it.

Save over $60 on the M5 MacBook Pro ahead of Black Friday.

SAVE 34%: As of Nov. 10, Apple AirPods 4 are on sale for $84.99 at Amazon. That's 34% off the $129 list price and a new all-time low for this model.

Apple AirPods 4 $84.99 at Amazon
$129 Save $44.01   Get Deal at Amazon Get Deal at Walmart Get Deal at Best Buy

I am that person with AirPods always on their last leg. One bud is always quieter than the other, or I've dropped the case one too many times. I've been waiting for a good deal to replace my old pair, and this is the first big price drop I’ve seen on the Apple AirPods 4.

As of Nov. 10, you can get the Apple AirPods 4 on sale for $84.99 at Amazon, down from $129. That's a 34% discount and over $44 in savings. It's also a new all-time low — they were $89 in July.

SEE ALSO: 10 Apple deals that prove Black Friday 2025 is starting earlier than ever

The AirPods 4 offer a more comfortable, stable fit with a shorter stem. Inside, they’re running the H2 chip, which powers the Personalized Spatial Audio and, more importantly, the new Voice Isolation feature. This is a huge upgrade for calls (it uses computational audio to reduce background noise, so you sound clearer).

They're also IP54 rated for dust, sweat, and water resistance, which applies to both the buds and the USB-C charging case. Battery life is solid, with up to five hours of listening time on a single charge (30 hours total with the case).

Note: This $84.99 deal is for the standard model without Active Noise Cancellation. Apple has an ANC version of this design, but it's $149.99. If you don't need ANC, you might want to jump on this deal before it's gone.