IT General

With the New Moon just a few days away, the Moon is shrinking into a thin crescent, with its lit surface fading more each night. For now, there's still a small bit of its surface illuminated, so keep reading to find out what you can see.

What is today’s Moon phase?

As of Saturday, March 14, the Moon phase is Waning Crescent. According to NASA's Daily Moon Guide, 24% of the Moon will be lit up tonight.

There's less visibility tonight, but still enough to spot some features. With just your naked eye, you can see the Aristarchus Plateau and the Kepler Crater. If you have a pair of binoculars or a telescope, get these out to see the Grimaldi Basin and the Gassendi Crater.

When is the next Full Moon?

In North America, the next Full Moon is predicted to take place on April 1.

What are Moon phases?

According to NASA, the Moon takes roughly 29.5 days to orbit Earth, passing through eight distinct phases along the way. Although we always see the same side of the Moon, the amount illuminated by the Sun shifts as it moves, which is why it can appear full, half-lit, or just a thin sliver at different times in the cycle. These shifting appearances are known as the lunar phases, and there are eight altogether:

New Moon - The Moon is between Earth and the sun, so the side we see is dark (in other words, it's invisible to the eye).

Waxing Crescent - A small sliver of light appears on the right side (Northern Hemisphere).

First Quarter - Half of the Moon is lit on the right side. It looks like a half-Moon.

Waxing Gibbous - More than half is lit up, but it’s not quite full yet.

Full Moon - The whole face of the Moon is illuminated and fully visible.

Waning Gibbous - The Moon starts losing light on the right side. (Northern Hemisphere)

Third Quarter (or Last Quarter) - Another half-Moon, but now the left side is lit.

Waning Crescent - A thin sliver of light remains on the left side before going dark again.

If you like playing daily word games like Wordle, then Hurdle is a great game to add to your routine.

There are five rounds to the game. The first round sees you trying to guess the word, with correct, misplaced, and incorrect letters shown in each guess. If you guess the correct answer, it'll take you to the next hurdle, providing the answer to the last hurdle as your first guess. This can give you several clues or none, depending on the words. For the final hurdle, every correct answer from previous hurdles is shown, with correct and misplaced letters clearly shown.

An important note is that the number of times a letter is highlighted from previous guesses does necessarily indicate the number of times that letter appears in the final hurdle.

If you find yourself stuck at any step of today's Hurdle, don't worry! We have you covered.

SEE ALSO: Hurdle: Everything you need to know to find the answers Hurdle Word 1 hint

Accessible.

SEE ALSO: Apple’s new M3 MacBook Air is $300 off at Amazon. And yes, I’m tempted. Hurdle Word 1 answer

HANDY

Hurdle Word 2 hint

Infected.

SEE ALSO: Wordle today: Answer, hints for March 14, 2026 Hurdle Word 2 Answer

RABID

Hurdle Word 3 hint

Goofy.

SEE ALSO: NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for March 14 SEE ALSO: NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for March 14, 2026 Hurdle Word 3 answer

SILLY

Hurdle Word 4 hint

A boss.

Hurdle Word 4 answer

MOGUL

Final Hurdle hint

A blanket.

SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Games available on Mashable Hurdle Word 5 answer

COVER

If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

The NYT Connections puzzle today is not too difficult if you love a fictional mystery.

Connections is the one of the most popular New York Times word games that's captured the public's attention. The game is all about finding the "common threads between words." And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.

If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for today's Connections solution. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable What is Connections?

The NYT's latest daily word game has become a social media hit. The Times credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications' Games section. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer.

If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.

SEE ALSO: NYT Pips hints, answers for March 14, 2026 Here's a hint for today's Connections categories

Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:

• Yellow: Mesmerized

• Green: A pair

• Blue: Detectives

• Purple: Girls in the wild

Here are today's Connections categories

Need a little extra help? Today's connections fall into the following categories:

• Yellow: Hypnotic state

• Green: Starting with prefixes meaning "Two"

• Blue: Fictional inspectors

• Purple: Ending in female animals

Looking for Wordle today? Here's the answer to today's Wordle.

Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions.

Drumroll, please!

The solution to today's Connections #1006 is...

What is the answer to Connections today

• Hypnotic state: DREAM, HAZE, SPELL, TRANCE

• Starting with prefixes meaning "Two": BINARY, DIOXIDE, DUOLINGO, TWILIGHT

• Fictional inspectors: CLOUSEAU, GADGET, JAVERT, MORSE

• Ending in female animals: HOOTENANNY, LICHEN, MOSCOW, NIGHTMARE

Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be new Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

SEE ALSO: NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for March 14, 2026

Are you also playing NYT Strands? Get all the Strands hints you need for today's puzzle.

If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections.

Today's NYT Strands hints are easy if you're a baker.

Strands, the New York Times' elevated word-search game, requires the player to perform a twist on the classic word search. Words can be made from linked letters — up, down, left, right, or diagonal, but words can also change direction, resulting in quirky shapes and patterns. Every single letter in the grid will be part of an answer. There's always a theme linking every solution, along with the "spangram," a special, word or phrase that sums up that day's theme, and spans the entire grid horizontally or vertically.

SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable

By providing an opaque hint and not providing the word list, Strands creates a brain-teasing game that takes a little longer to play than its other games, like Wordle and Connections.

If you're feeling stuck or just don't have 10 or more minutes to figure out today's puzzle, we've got all the NYT Strands hints for today's puzzle you need to progress at your preferred pace.

SEE ALSO: Wordle today: Answer, hints for March 14, 2026 SEE ALSO: NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for March 14, 2026 NYT Strands hint for today’s theme: A math teacher's favorite dessert

The words are related to food.

Today’s NYT Strands theme plainly explained

These words describe a sweet treat.

NYT Strands spangram hint: Is it vertical or horizontal?

Today's NYT Strands spangram is horizontal.

NYT Strands spangram answer today

Today's spangram is Happy Pi Day.

NYT Strands word list for March 14

• Edges

• Fruit

• Glaze

• Crust

• Happy Pi Day

• Vent

• Filling

• Lattice

Looking for other daily online games? Mashable's Games page has more hints, and if you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now!

Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Strands.

Today's Wordle answer should be easy to solve if you're good with anatomy.

If you just want to be told today's word, you can jump to the bottom of this article for today's Wordle solution revealed. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable SEE ALSO: NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for March 14, 2026 Where did Wordle come from?

Originally created by engineer Josh Wardle as a gift for his partner, Wordle rapidly spread to become an international phenomenon, with thousands of people around the globe playing every day. Alternate Wordle versions created by fans also sprang up, including battle royale Squabble, music identification game Heardle, and variations like Dordle and Quordle that make you guess multiple words at once. 

Wordle eventually became so popular that it was purchased by the New York Times, and TikTok creators even livestream themselves playing.

What's the best Wordle starting word?

The best Wordle starting word is the one that speaks to you. But if you prefer to be strategic in your approach, we have a few ideas to help you pick a word that might help you find the solution faster. One tip is to select a word that includes at least two different vowels, plus some common consonants like S, T, R, or N.

What happened to the Wordle archive?

The entire archive of past Wordle puzzles was originally available for anyone to enjoy whenever they felt like it, but it was later taken down, with the website's creator stating it was done at the request of the New York Times. However, the New York Times then rolled out its own Wordle Archive, available only to NYT Games subscribers.

Is Wordle getting harder?

It might feel like Wordle is getting harder, but it actually isn't any more difficult than when it first began. You can turn on Wordle's Hard Mode if you're after more of a challenge, though.

SEE ALSO: NYT Pips hints, answers for March 14, 2026 Here's a subtle hint for today's Wordle answer:

Above the foot.

Does today's Wordle answer have a double letter?

There are no recurring letters.

Today's Wordle is a 5-letter word that starts with...

Today's Wordle starts with the letter A.

SEE ALSO: Wordle-obsessed? These are the best word games to play IRL. The Wordle answer today is...

Get your last guesses in now, because it's your final chance to solve today's Wordle before we reveal the solution.

Drumroll please!

The solution to today's Wordle is...

ANKLE

Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be a new Wordle for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints. Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.

Reporting by Chance Townsend, Caitlin Welsh, Sam Haysom, Amanda Yeo, Shannon Connellan, Cecily Mauran, Mike Pearl, and Adam Rosenberg contributed to this article.

If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Wordle.

TL;DR: Live stream Venezuela vs. Japan in the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free on Tele Rebelde or Venevision. Access these free streaming platforms from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.

The 2026 World Baseball Classic pool stage was pretty epic, but we're expecting even more drama from the knockout rounds. The final quarter final sees Venezuela take on Japan. Venezuela qualified for this stage by coming second in Group D behind Puerto Rico. Japan have won every game so far, and topped Group C ahead of South Korea.

Japan will be favorites to advance to the semi-final stage. All eyes will be on superstar Shohei Ohtani as he looks to lead his side to another World Baseball Classic trophy.

If you want to watch the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

When is Venezuela vs. Japan?

Venezuela vs. Japan in the 2026 World Baseball Classic starts at 9 p.m. ET on March 14. This fixture will take place at LoanDepot Park.

How to watch Venezuela vs. Japan for free

The 2026 World Baseball Classic is available to live stream for free on a number of platforms:

• Cuba — Tele Rebelde

• Venezuela — Venevision

These streaming platforms are geo-restricted, but anyone can access for free with a VPN. These handy tools can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to a secure server in another location, meaning you can unblock free streaming sites from anywhere in the world.

Live stream Venezuela vs. Japan in the World Baseball Classic by following these simple steps:

1. Subscribe to a streaming-friendly VPN (like ExpressVPN)

2. Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

3. Open up the app and connect to a server in a location with access

4. Visit Tele Rebelde or Venevision

5. Live stream the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free from anywhere in the world

Opens in a new window Credit: ExpressVPN ExpressVPN (1-Month Plan) $12.99 only at ExpressVPN (with money-back guarantee) Get Deal

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but leading VPNs do tend to offer free-trial periods or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can gain access to free live streams without committing with your cash. This is obviously not a long-term solution, but it does give you time to watch every game from the 2026 World Baseball Classic before recovering your investment.

If you want to retain permanent access to the best free streaming platforms from around the world, you'll need a subscription. Fortunately, the best VPN for live sport is on sale for a limited time.

What is the best VPN for live sport?

ExpressVPN is the best service for bypassing geo-restrictions to stream live sport, for a number of reasons:

• Servers in 105 countries

• Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

• Strict no-logging policy so your data is always secure

• Fast connection speeds

• Up to 10 simultaneous connections

• 30-day money-back guarantee

A two-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $68.40 and includes an extra four months for free — 81% off for a limited time. This plan includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee. Alternatively, you can get a one-month plan for just $12.99 (with money-back guarantee).

Watch Venezuela vs. Japan in the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free with ExpressVPN.

Film festivals are rich terrain for brilliant cinematic discoveries, and among the finest and funkiest finds of SXSW 2026 is Edie Arnold is a Loser. The feature directorial debut of Megan Rico and Kade Atwood, this coming-of-age comedy is as hilarious as it is chaotic and devilishly iconoclastic. 

Like Juno, this fresh and funny film centers on a high school weirdo who treads an unconventional path to finding her bliss. Now, Edie Arnold (Adi Madden Cabrera) is not getting preggo out of wedlock. Sure, the scowling nuns at her all-girls Catholic school consider Edie an underachieving delinquent, but she doesn't drink, and celibacy is practically the only extracurricular activity she's succeeding at — though not by choice. Like her classmates, she lusts after the only boy in their orbit, altar boy Walter Boyd (Lucas Van Orden), described by Edie's friends as "like Jesus's hotter younger brother, who was too hot to die." But to him, she's invisible… until she haphazardly starts a punk band called The Nundead. 

So begins a wild ride of self-discovery, friendship, fumbled flirtations, and punk rock. 

Edie Arnold is a Loser cleverly explores identity through crushes.  Credit: Courtesy of Infigo Films

Out the gate, co-director/screenwriter Megan Rico puts a strong stamp on her coming-of-age comedy, just as Diablo Cody did with Juno. It's not that Edie and her peers speak with the verbal panache and enticingly quirky slang of Juno and her peers. It's that Edie and her best friend Frances (a brilliantly broad McKenna Tuckett) are hilariously irreverent in their mercurial rebellions. When a young new nun named Sister Sheena (Luseane Pasa) tries to get the cacophony of a girls' choir into shape, Frances and Edie take the opportunity to goof off with violent miming. They imagine they're popping out their eyeballs or being tased, implying that's less torturous than playing the organ and percussion for this ungodly choir. Rico and Atwood add a little spice to this scene by papering over scribbled graphics that illustrate blood, drool, darts, and electric jolts, emphasizing the spunk of these irrepressible girls. 

The nuns who run the school demand that these girls be poised, polite, and obedient. Edie's earnest mom (Cherish Rodriguez), who is always desperate to impress, badgers her endlessly to be more feminine and gentle. Then there's the vicious queen bee Kati Vidal (Alana Mei Kern), who relishes every opportunity to embarrass Edie, like when Kati ties tampons into Edie's hair without her knowledge. ("I got tamped!" Edie groans at lunch with her four loser friends, who are destined to be Nundead.) But whatever fresh hell comes her way, Frances — whose aggressive headgear matches her pugnacious energy — has got her back. Together, they sneak out to a local punk show, where Edie makes a big impression, leading the girls to form a band and bring a cute young punk named Iggy (Gabe Root) into their orbit. 

While Frances is devoted to raising hell and having fun, Edie faces the question of who she will choose to be. Two distinct paths are presented through two very different boys. One is Walter Boyd, who seems religious and respectable, but secretly swigs communion wine and has less holier-than-thou ideas about sex. The other is Iggy, who has a punk aesthetic that might spook Edie's mom, but a punk soul that reflects her own. And yet, Edie Arnold is a Loser isn't really about the boys. It's about the girls, who write wild songs with lyrics like, "Cannibalize your lord and savior. Eat me! Eat me! EAT ME!"

Edie Arnold is a Loser is a sensational buddy comedy.  Credit: Courtesy of Infigo Films

Having been a loser in a Catholic high school myself, it was easy to see myself in Edie (even if I was never cool enough to start a band or learn the drums). Cabrera perfectly grounds Edie's teen angst, petty rebellions, and the awkward yearning of such an existence. But she's at her best when she and Tuckett are being gleefully combative.

Too often overlooked in movies about sisterhood are the cutting inside jokes that you can only pull on the girls who know you better than your own blood. So whether Edie and Frances are joking or fighting, it's radiantly clear what they mean to each other. And yes, even when a furious Frances improvises a diss track about Edie, the love is clear, the loyalty unquestionable.

Cabrera shoulders this chaotic coming-of-age tale with aplomb. Her supporting cast shines with an array of fools, bitches, and bozos (save for the truly splendid Sister Sheena). But newcomer McKenna Tuckett is the standout. As Frances, she exudes a mischievously wild energy, reminiscent of Beanie Feldstein's passionate theater kid in Lady Bird or the cocky Jack Black in High Fidelity. Frances has no fucks to give about being cool; she brandishes her headgear like a bull's horns, a threat for those who don't realize she's not to be messed with. She's the wild card who pushes Edie when she needs a good push (be it on stage or standing up to her mom). And together, they have a Romy and Michelle day, in that their movie might have a subplot boys and crushes, but in the end, it's really about their bond. And how it's weird, beautiful, and divine. 

Simply put, this indie coming-of-age comedy is sensational. Edie Arnold is a Loser is unapologetically outrageous, touching, and really goddamn funny. Look for it, and embrace your inner loser. 

Edie Arnold is a Loser was reviewed at the 2026 SXSW Film Festival.

At SXSW, the AI audio company ElevenLabs partnered with Rebecca Gayheart Dane, the wife of the late actor Eric Dane, to promote a new initiative that will provide free AI voice restoration to 1 million people with permanent voice loss.

Appearing alongside Gayheart Dane at a SXSW panel on Friday, ElevenLabs co-founder Mati Staniszewski said the company is actively looking for people around the world to participate in the 1 Million Voices Initiative.

Staniszewski encouraged audience members to share contact information for people suffering from voice loss due to cancer and other medical issues; potential participants can fill out an interest form online.

Eric Dane, known for his work in Euphoria and Grey's Anatomy, died in February after a struggle with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Prior to his death, he worked with ElevenLabs to clone and restore his voice. Now Gayheart Dane wants to champion this technology for others.

“Our voices are such an important part of who we are, and something most of us take for granted,” she said. “As Eric's speech became gradually more impaired, I watched how that loss dimmed so much of his joy and sense of self. When he received his ElevenLabs voice, it made him emotional to have that part of himself back, and to know our daughters would always be able to hear his voice.”

Rebecca Gayheart Dane, Mati Staniszewski, and Yvonne Johnson appeared on the "Restoring Voices" panel at SXSW. Credit: Timothy Werth / Mashable

AI is a controversial and divisive technology, of course. Deepfakes, misinformation, and copyright infringement have been regular themes in the AI discussions at SXSW technology panels in 2026. But just like any tool, it can be used in a positive way too.

“You know, people are very careful and concerned about AI technology in general, but this is the best example of using it for good,” Gayheart Dane said. “And I think that message means to be spread greatly, large and loud.

"Because [AI] can be used for good, and maybe this will inspire others, other AI companies, to do something good with their capabilities instead of something nefarious.”

SEE ALSO: It's time to add AI protections to your will How the 11 Million Voices Initiative works

To find people with voice loss and restore their voices, ElevenLabs is working with accessibility nonprofits and disability foundations like the Scott-Morgan Foundation.

Using a voicemail or a short video, ElevenLabs AI tools can faithfully recreate a person’s voice, allowing them to communicate in real-time using their own lost voice.

To promote the initiative, ElevenLabs also premiered the 11 Voices docuseries at SXSW. The series profiles 11 people with voice loss, all of whom are working with the 1 Million Voices initiative. 

Yvonne Johnson, a British woman with ALS who appears in 11 Voices, also participated in the panel, sharing her journey with voice loss and AI voice cloning. Using AI, ElevenLabs was able to recreate her voice, right down to the North London accent.

The docuseries shows Johnson renewing her vows with her husband. Speaking at the panel with her restored voice, Johnson said that the technology has been a huge gift for her family.

"So I simply type what I want to say, the same as you would with a text message, and then I just press a speech button, and my beautiful voice comes through," Johnson said at the panel.

"You can also tell someone off. I mean, really tell someone off,” she said — looking at her husband and son in the audience with a smile.

TL;DR: Live stream Puerto Rico vs. Italy in the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free on Tele Rebelde or Venevision. Access these free streaming platforms from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.

The 2026 World Baseball Classic has already produced a number of interesting storylines, but Italy's victory over USA was probably the biggest moment of the competition so far. How far can Italy go in this tournament? Next they face Puerto Rico in the third quarter final on the schedule. This contest is tough to call — it could go either way.

If you want to watch the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

When is Puerto Rico vs. Italy?

Puerto Rico vs. Italy in the 2026 World Baseball Classic starts at 3 p.m. ET on March 14. This fixture will take place at Daikin Park.

How to watch Puerto Rico vs. Italy for free

The 2026 World Baseball Classic is available to live stream for free on a number of platforms:

• Cuba — Tele Rebelde

• Venezuela — Venevision

These streaming platforms are geo-restricted, but anyone can access for free with a VPN. These handy tools can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to a secure server in another location, meaning you can unblock free streaming sites from anywhere in the world.

Live stream Puerto Rico vs. Italy in the World Baseball Classic by following these simple steps:

1. Subscribe to a streaming-friendly VPN (like ExpressVPN)

2. Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

3. Open up the app and connect to a server in a location with access

4. Visit Tele Rebelde or Venevision

5. Live stream the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free from anywhere in the world

Opens in a new window Credit: ExpressVPN ExpressVPN (1-Month Plan) $12.99 only at ExpressVPN (with money-back guarantee) Get Deal

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but leading VPNs do tend to offer free-trial periods or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can gain access to free live streams without committing with your cash. This is obviously not a long-term solution, but it does give you time to watch every game from the 2026 World Baseball Classic before recovering your investment.

If you want to retain permanent access to the best free streaming platforms from around the world, you'll need a subscription. Fortunately, the best VPN for live sport is on sale for a limited time.

What is the best VPN for live sport?

ExpressVPN is the best service for bypassing geo-restrictions to stream live sport, for a number of reasons:

• Servers in 105 countries

• Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

• Strict no-logging policy so your data is always secure

• Fast connection speeds

• Up to 10 simultaneous connections

• 30-day money-back guarantee

A two-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $68.40 and includes an extra four months for free — 81% off for a limited time. This plan includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee. Alternatively, you can get a one-month plan for just $12.99 (with money-back guarantee).

Watch Puerto Rico vs. Italy in the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free with ExpressVPN.

TL;DR: Keep your devices powered up with the tiny GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable, on sale now for just $21.99 (reg. $49.99).

Opens in a new window Credit: GoCable GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable $21.99
$49.99 Save $28.00   Get Deal

Gone are the days of carrying around a super-heavy power bank to keep your devices charged. The GoCable not only fits on your keyring and tags along anywhere easily, but it also handles eight different tasks in the process.

Right now, you can secure the GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable for just $21.99 (reg. $49.99).

Mashable Deals Be the first to know! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Loading... Sign Me Up By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Thanks for signing up!

How many cords do you need to take with you on vacation? How about on a usual work day? If the answer is more than one, you know all too well how frustrating it can be to untangle a web of cords in your bag. The GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable sets out to change all that — providing multiple ways to power up in one convenient package.

The GoCable 8-in-1 combines eight essential features into a sleek, keychain-attachable design. It features 100W ultra-fast charging, so you can power up your devices — from smartphones to laptops — quickly with Type-C, Type-C+, and Apple Lightning connectors. All you need to add is a power bank or wall adapter.

Need to transfer something? The GoCable also features high-speed file transfer capabilities. An LED power display shows real-time charging status, and the GoCable also includes a magnetic cable to prevent annoying tangling. Just toss it in your bag and forget about it, resting easy knowing your devices can easily be charged back up on the go.

The GoCable doesn’t just charge your devices; it also includes hidden features to make life a little easier. There’s a bottle opener and a safe-proofed hidden cutter that helps you open packages safely. An included carabiner clip can also attach to bags or belts, making it easy to keep on hand.

Don’t go anywhere without the GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable, on sale now for just $21.99 (reg. $49.99).

StackSocial prices subject to change.

I can't count the number of times I stood outside my neighborhood church and lied to myself about my smartphone usage.

Over the past decade, my daughters have often stopped to play on the church's thick grass lawn. That's when I engage in the ritual of pulling the device from my pocket to pass the time, under the guise of efficiency. The lie arrives swiftly: You need to catch up on the online grocery order. You need to respond to that unanswered text message. Don't you need to know the weekend weather forecast? 

If I did see what I was doing, justifications would follow. Hey, your parents didn't watch you every second of the day. You're not doomscrolling, you're being productive!  It was only when I cut my phone out of my life for 24 hours that I saw those justifications were deceptions as well.

SEE ALSO: Yes, you can unplug for 24 hours

After writing a story about the annual Global Day of Unplugging, I decided to try it for myself. I emerged a changed person. When I returned to the church lawn just a few days later, I couldn't recognize my former self — the one who was convinced that her smartphone served her best interests.  

Now the constant connectivity seems like torture. When I don't have my phone at my side, I no longer have the fear that something is undone or amiss. The sensation of my phone in my back or coat pocket no longer registers as convenience but as a burden.

Instead, I feel a deep and abiding sense of ease. I have successfully reset my nervous system, shifting out of constant high-alert and into the sought-after "rest and digest" state. I'm much more patient with my children. And I sleep easier than I have in years.

I've read stories like this before, always with a skeptical eye. I thought 24-hour breaks were for people who used their smartphone mindlessly. I thought I had strong tech boundaries. After all, I report on the science of digital technology and well-being. My family has a no-phone rule at dinnertime. I didn't scroll social media in bed. I turn off notifications for most apps, and use the focus mode regularly.

Nonetheless, I'd built an illusion of freedom, underneath which my mind and attention remained yoked to my smartphone. I spent my days optimizing for productivity and efficiency. I toggled between email, texts, weather, maps, shopping, and other apps. My mind generated a never-ending list of tasks to complete on a screen. 

The scene at the church lawn wasn't unique. I did this nearly everywhere, even as I occasionally challenged myself to leave the phone untouched for short bursts. 

But a day without my phone was what it took to teach me that true liberation means living in the ambiguous and imperfect present, without a device as your dictator — or your crutch. 

"Not everything needs to be known" 

The idea of a digital sabbath has been around for years. I had long discounted the impact it might have on me personally. Still, the interviews I conducted for my story on the Global Day of Unplugging awakened something. 

When I decided to participate, I set low expectations. At first I committed to a 12-hour fast, from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. My husband agreed to join me. To my surprise, a few family members did as well, when I informed our group chat that I would be unavailable via text for the evening. 

And that meant, for the first time that I can recall since I became a smartphone owner in 2009, I slept with my device in a different room.

This should have been low-hanging fruit. I knew the research that suggests a smartphone in the bedroom can worsen sleep. But without a landline, I feared I'd miss an emergency call in the middle of the night from a family member. I'd grown accustomed to listening to a 10-minute meditation on my phone at bedtime. Secretly, I didn't want to lose my meditation app streak. 

For this experiment, I decided to move my phone to the kitchen overnight. I took logistical advice from Catherine Price, author of How to Break Up with Your Phone: The 30-Day Plan to Take Back Your Life, who recommended putting my phone on do-not-disturb while also leaving the ringer on in case a "favorite" contact needed to reach me.

I thought I'd struggle to fall asleep, but the opposite happened: I drifted off peacefully, no meditation needed. 

SEE ALSO: Can a $250 alarm clock break my doomscrolling habit? I slept next to the Dreamie for a month to find out.

There were moments of restlessness, but I awoke in the morning feeling lighter and more refreshed. I could've looked at my phone then; I'd hit the 12-hour mark. Whether it was the curious journalist or competitive athlete in me — or a combination of both — I decided I wanted to go further. Maybe I could make it 24 hours. A family caregiver would be spending the day with our kids, as my husband and I ventured out into the world without phones.

The preplanned date made sticking to a 24-hour fast trickier than it might have otherwise been. Our phones came with us, but they traveled in a zippered pouch in a backpack instead of our pockets.

First, we ran an errand that had been on our calendar for weeks. We discovered upon arriving that we were a half hour early, a product of not checking our phones habitually to confirm the details in advance. We decided to walk to a pizzeria for a quick slice. I knew from experience that it was a five to seven-minute walk.

Any other day I would've pulled up the location in my maps app to confirm the distance and walking time. Not this time. As we strolled, a phrase came to mind: not everything needs to be known. 

Freedom from the impulse to check

The impulse to check my phone arose multiple times early on that day, just as Price had warned. 

"The moment you put your phone down your brain is going to protest by coming up with all of these things you need to check or look up or buy or do," she told me. "It really is kind of fascinating how panicked your brain will get." 

Price recommended carrying a notebook to guard against the checking reflex, which I did. Yet a curious pattern emerged each time my brain wanted to consult the phone: None of the tasks were really that urgent or necessary. 

I didn't need to know the exact temperature; it was as unseasonably warm as our digital home thermometer said it would be. Still, my mind continued to search for things to do. Wouldn't it be nice to visit Lake Tahoe this summer? Maybe I should check the going rental rates. 

I heard the refrain again: Not everything needs to be known. 

After the errand, my husband and I decided to spend the summer-like spring day at the beach. Without checking a maps app, we concluded that traffic jams and packed parking lots would make the trip unpleasant. We opted for public transit instead, taking our chances on a ferry without checking the schedule. 

Once in the car, we realized neither of us knew how to get to the closest freeway entrance. We could've stopped and asked a stranger for directions, but for the video game-like maze of freeway entrances and the lack of places to park. Instead I summoned my phone's voice assistant — from the trunk — for brief directions, via the car's console. Once on the freeway, I exited the maps app on the console because I knew my way. 

This, I realized, is what it actually feels like to use your phone as a tool. 

No selfies, no problems

More than a hundred people stood in line at the ferry terminal, trying to shield themselves from the sun. Our phones remained stashed in the pouch. We didn't want them to rescue us from the uncertainty of the next boat's arrival.

The ferry came into view quickly, and we managed to shuffle slowly on board before the boat reached capacity. I contemplated a selfie with my husband, the wind whipping our hair as the ferry sped across the bay, faster than I've ever experienced. Normally I would've documented the moment and texted the image to a family thread as evidence of our adventure, awaiting their digital-heart responses.

But I didn't need the selfie or those affirmations today. The phone stayed stowed away.

Once in the city, I remembered which train would take us the eight-plus miles to the beach. On the train we counted each stop — more than two dozen of them between us and the Pacific Ocean, which crashed onto the beach before us an hour later.

The sound of waves usually calms my nervous system. This time, though, I arrived feeling relaxed. I hadn't battled traffic to this gorgeous destination, that was part of it. But I could also feel the equanimity of a peaceful existence start to override the impulse to check something — anything! — on my phone.

"I feel free," I told my husband, as we looked towards the thin blue horizon line. 

An adventure from before smartphones

Dinnertime approached. We walked to a restaurant we'd seen from the train. The fusion taco menu was a nice surprise; we hadn't checked what the restaurant served, or its reviews. The food took a while. We people-watched and bantered about the restaurant's early 2000s SoCal surf soundtrack instead of disappearing into devices. 

The food delay made our trip home more complicated than we expected. As the minutes ticked away, so did our ability to make the right ferry back home (I'd written down the schedule in my notebook). So we decided to take a ride-share car to a commuter train, which would deposit us as close to the ferry terminal where we parked as possible.

Once it helped in hailing the car, the phone stayed in its pouch. Again, it played the part of a useful tool instead of a distraction to mask our stress about getting back to our kids. 

SEE ALSO: Why I meditate while driving

Arriving at the train stop close to the ferry terminal, we looked for buses to take us the rest of the way. None were expected to come soon. So we opted to walk through the city without the aid of the maps app. We trusted our knowledge of the neighborhood's layout from years of driving through it.

I still don't know how long we walked. I never checked. We marveled during the stroll about how the day's adventure felt like something we would've done ages ago, before smartphones. 

'So you were like a kid?'

I later recounted the story to my older tween daughter, who does not have a smartphone but is surrounded by peers who do. I told her we'd spent the day navigating without directions or any clear timeline.

"So you were like a kid, then?" she asked me. I couldn't think of a more bittersweet response.

A few days later, thinking back on it, I felt a surge of anger. My 24-hour fast had reframed so much of my tech use as a waste of time, when I believed it to be productive and useful. This angry feeling is apparently common amongst those who unplug, according to the experts I've interviewed. Now I understand why everyone who has the phone-free epiphany proselytizes about it. 

As I write this, I'm three days out from my 24-hour fast. I'm learning to navigate the workweek without making my phone central to it. The transition isn't easy. I missed an important call and feel the urge to be available to friends and family via text. I've certainly thought twice about texting someone who's turned on do-not-disturb; I don't want to suddenly feel unreachable.

But I also don't want my attention split into meaningless fragments. And it took coming back to that church lawn to remind me.

That evening I was walking the dog with my younger daughter. She just lost her first tooth, often joyously hop-skips, and likes to collect tiny flower bouquets for me. Choral practice was underway inside the church; she was intrigued by the voices singing in harmony. She peered through the window, on tip toes, to take in the scene. I encouraged her to walk through the open front door and peek inside. She reported back: "They're singing!"

I grew up attending Catholic mass and have always been moved by hymnal singing. This time, tears gathered as I stood still and listened, while watching my daughter dart between blooming bushes, gathering scattered fallen flowers for me.

My phone was in my pocket. I had no urge to reach for it. I could not have cared less about my shopping list, unanswered texts, or the weather forecast. I was content in the moment, as the sky slowly darkened around us and voices in unison gave praise to God. 

YouTube still hasn't solved its AI problem. Digitally faked content is still seeping through the cracks, as users are inundated with AI-generated brainrot and AI-powered misinformation.

But Google, YouTube's parent company, believes it can at least assuage the worries of concerned parents — with even more AI.

SEE ALSO: Viral hit 'Your AI Slop Bores Me' is more than a joke YouTube bets on AI-powered kids media

On March 4, the tech giant announced it was investing $1 million into the AI-powered children's entertainment company Animaj, the first kids media business backed by Google’s AI Future Funds accelerator, Bloomberg reported. Under the deal, Animaj will also get exclusive access to its generative AI tools, like Veo and Imagine.

Behind the scenes, AI slop — particularly AI slop created for babies — has become one of the easiest ways to make a killing online. And YouTube is particularly rife ground, as the video viewing platform attracts the youngest demographic of child viewers.

Google has acknowledged its AI slop problem before, and even made efforts to demonetize accounts that post "low quality clutter." But studies show that children are still regularly recommended AI slop by YouTube's algorithms. A New York Times analysis published in February found thousands of examples of AI slop targeting young viewers, including ones that violate YouTube's child safety policies. In addition, YouTube does not require AI labelling on animated videos, the Times reported.

"It's not unlike Google to try to deflect attention from the real issue: AI slop is rampant on YouTube and YouTube kids, which puts developing children at risk of harm," said Rachel Franz, director of Fairplay for Kids' Young Children Thrive Offline program. Fairplay is a child safety nonprofit that researches the impact of screen time and commercial advertising on early childhood. "If 'managing AI slop' was really YouTube's top priority this year," said Franz, "they would have already taken down the millions of AI-generated 'Made for Kids' videos that are designed to entrance young children, leading to more screen time and displacing the activities they need to thrive offline."

View this post on Instagram What is Animaj?

Animaj is an AI content studio geared toward children's media. A 2026 show reel highlighting the company's flagship brands shows Animaji's particular emphasis on popular kids' IP, including Pocoyo and Ubisoft's Rabbids. "Animaj is a next-generation media company building the future of kids’ entertainment," the video description reads. "We acquire and grow iconic children’s IPs such as Pocoyo and Maya the Bee into global franchises through a digital-first, multi-platform strategy powered by AI-driven creativity."

Animaj scales existing IP using its proprietary AI tools, with the goal of bringing content "wherever kids are, whenever they want it." The company's co-founder Sixte de Vauplane has said he sees Animaj as proof of concept for high-quality, feature-length films powered by AI.

The company is affiliated with several kid-centric YouTube channels too, including the infant channel Hey Kids, a brand with more than 4 million subscribers. Bloomberg reported that the company's affiliated channels accumulated more than 22 billion views in 2025.

The problem isn't just AI

"These videos are pretty typical AI-generated videos that attract families because they are nursery rhymes and feature kid-friendly characters. But the videos are more about mesmerizing than anything else," said Franz.

Child safety advocates and education experts warn against content aimed at "mesmerizing" children with stimulating visuals and music, instead steering families toward evidence-based educational content with a slower pace and frequent interaction, like call-and-response queues. The American Academy of Pediatrics warns parents against AI-generated content and encourages them to choose longer-form videos over short-form content.

They need to fix their platform. Until that happens, no child is truly going to benefit.

Content that mesmerizes children — of which there is plenty on the platform — "displaces the time they need to spend playing, socializing, and using all their senses" during a period in which infants are still "wiring" their brains, said Franz. While this is a particular problem with AI-generated video, it also goes for human-created content, like the popular CocoMelon YouTube channel and even well-intentioned children's social media entertainers. "Now we have this layer of AI that has the potential to have unprecedented effects on our kids," she explains.

Replacing "low quality" slop with "high quality" kids content isn't a solution either, Franz argues, pointing at a body of research showing any screen time has adverse affects on children under the age of two. "Yet, Animaj's YouTube Channels are rife with videos for babies," said Franz. "If Google invests in [channels like] Hey Kids via Animaj, it means that it is investing in harming babies."

And even if you solve for content and age, there still a looming problem: The platform itself. Experts like Franz warn that the YouTube's very design is developmentally inappropriate for most children. Franz notes features like endless scrolling on reels, algorithm-based suggested videos, and the inability to turn off automatic playing as adverse to healthy development recommendations.

With it's focus on existing IP, Animaj may not be in the business of generating the kind of surreal, often obscene, brain rot peddled by hundreds of other YouTube creators. Nonetheless, Franz worries that the normalization of AI and its generative tools may supercharge an industry that is doing the opposite of what early childhood researchers recommend.

In a LinkedIn post last week, AI Futures Fund director Jon Silber said that Animaj is presenting a "blueprint for the future." He wrote that "getting this right for the next generation is a huge priority" for Google.

"If YouTube wants to try to make good content, fine. But they need to fix their platform. Until that happens, no child is truly going to benefit," said Franz.

When I started building my smart home, I was still figuring things out and making mistakes. But one thing I’m glad I got right from the start was the decision to use a mesh network, rather than just relying on Wi-Fi for everything.

Is it possible to have an even-tempered conversation about AI right now? It feels like there are two camps on the artificial intelligence debate, with one side promising that AI will save humanity from disease and labor, while the other warns AI will bring about the abrupt eradication of all mankind. Are you panicked yet? 

Join the club. AI is being developed so fast and furiously that it's already spread into our home lives, professional lives, love lives, playtime, politics, and art. It feels inescapable, and that can be pretty damn scary. Because for better or worse, the world around us is changing at a pace few of us truly understand. It's that mounting terror that inspired Canadian documentarian Daniel Roher to chart his journey in understanding AI by interviewing experts, engineers, and CEOs. 

The resulting film, The AI Doc: Or How I Became an Apocaloptimist, compiles a mountain of big ideas, opposing theories, and talking head interviews. But it does so within a personal framing that keeps this discussion deeply human. 

Roher won't feign a stoic objectivity. He'll share his fears, not just about AI, but also about becoming a parent in this time of indisputable change. He'll freak out, not just in his questions, but in his reflections with his wife, who serves as the film's narrator and occasionally the voice of reason. And he'll ultimately craft a journey that feels like a panic attack in real time. In the end, you may not feel better about mankind's chances against the rise of AI. But you'll likely feel less helpless in the future before us all. 

The AI Doc has a tender and thoughtful approach.  Daniel Roher considers the future in "The AI Doc: Or How I Became an Apocaloptimist." Credit: Focus Features

It all began with Roher realizing that AI was finding its way into screenwriting tools. Like many a writer, this struck him with a pang of existential dread. If machines are going to be creating art, what does that mean for those of us who have dedicated our lives to craftsmanship, only to have AI aggregate our work and every other collectible bit of writing across human history to use to regurgitate its approximation of art? 

From there, Roher's look at the future was soaked in panic. The joyful news of his wife's pregnancy with their first child became a new path for his fears of the future and AI. To present this internal struggle in a visual space, Roher brings in hand-drawn animation of himself and his wife. Reenactments or conversations become a twee flipbook, where the two exchange worried glances across torn pages. His desire to understand AI becomes not a metaphorical mountain to climb, but an animation of crumpled paper, building a mountain within his humble shed. 

By contrast, the area where Roher and his co-director Charlie Tyrell will interview subjects is a precise and simple setup: a dark charcoal backdrop, a plain white chair, a banal brown table. Whether they are interviewing top CEOs of AI companies, like Open AI CEO Sam Altman, Anthropic co-founders Daniela Amodei and Dario Amodei, and DeepMind co-founder Demis Hassabis, or reporters, activists, historians, and game theorists, the setting is the same. The audience won't be swayed by some cool Silicon Valley backdrop or a cluttered office. The focus is on these people, who are shot talking straight to camera. The effect is that they are talking directly to us in the audience. And it's very effective. 

By making himself a part of the narrative, and then sitting us down as if we are in his seat, staring directly into the eyes of his interviewees, Roher puts the audience in his shoes, in his perspective. As a result, I felt so invested — so a part of this conversation — that I couldn't stop myself from talking back. Not trying to join in or talking over the movie; don't mistake me. But I kept hearing myself clucking along with little sounds of agreement, or dismay, or confusion. I realized my brain was so engaged in the back-and-forth between the interviewer and interviewee that I was subconsciously responding as if I were in that room in that moment. 

Between the handmade animations and the direct-address approach of the interviews, The AI Doc reminds us constantly that we are human and that we are a part of this conversation, even if we aren't in the rooms where the big decisions are being made. 

The AI Doc is terrifying and a must-see.  Animation in the future in "The AI Doc: Or How I Became an Apocaloptimist." Credit: Focus Features

The first leg of Roher's journey is absolutely frightening. As teased in the documentary, he speaks to AI Risk experts who don't hold back about the risks of employing AI in military operations, drone strikes, or war. Then, beyond asking these people about some vague future, he asks them if they'd consider having kids, knowing what they know. Roher's quest to be a good father repeatedly grounds this film, pulling it away from the hypothetical to the constant demand of caring for a child in a world you cannot control. 

After so much "what could go wrong" talk, his wife pleads he consider what could go right. So begins a new chapter of the doc, that plays with radiant, colorful animations of the idyllic future imagined by the optimists, who believe AI could eradicate disease and give rise to a new freedom from labor, allowing Roher's son a romantic life as a poet living abroad. As enchanting an answer as this is, it's the next swell of emotion. First comes the panic, then the attempt at battling back with hope. Then comes the tricky bit of picking through what we know — not just what we feel or fear — and what could truly be. This rationalizing is where politics, cultural values, and corporate greed come into play as factors, muddying the paths of the detractors and the optimists. Then, like the A-lister cameo popping up in the third act of a Marvel movie, Roher brings in the biggest names in AI. It's tempting to buy the same sales pitch that they've given governments and investors to great success. But Roher won't give them the last word. That's for us, because even in the face of so much fear and uncertainty, Roher calls for us to become apocaloptimists. 

Don’t miss out on our latest stories: Add Mashable as a trusted news source in Google.

A portmanteau that combines "apocalypse" and optimist," the film's title not only calls us to understand the big, scary terrain of AI now, but to recognize it and choose hope and action. The film gives closure to Roher's personal journey in becoming a dad, but doesn't cop out as if parenthood is the only and best means to becoming a better person. (Looking at you, Marty Supreme.) Instead, the film shares some ways its audience can more actively be apart of the conversation, and provides a link to the film's website for engagement that meets us where we are. Which, if you're anything like me, means way too online. 

Incredibly, The AI Doc: Or How I became an Apocaloptimist clocks in at under two hours, and yet provides a wealth of information about AI within a framework that prevents our heads from exploding. While there were parts that made me want to switch off, maybe even run, Roher and Tyrell have a masterful understanding of their audience. So the film has an almost roller-coaster ride flow. It begins with cranking things up, creating context, and ratcheting up the fears over AI. Then, a release, not with a scream but a space where sci-fi utopias are imagined in charming illustration. Then, again the cranking, this time making us take in all we've heard, our brains the grinding gears. Finally, a message of cautious optimism and activism, and in that rush, we are released back into the world. Now, what will we do with it?

The AI Doc: Or How I Became an Apocaloptimist was reviewed out SXSW 2026. The film will open in theaters on March 27.

Forget brat summer — Charli XCX is working on film star fall. Following hot on the heels of playing herself in the Gen Z comedy series Overcompensating, the British pop star hit the Venice film festival with 100 Nights of Hero, a fashion-forward fantasy romance from Julia Jackman. Then came the Toronto International Film Festival, where she appears in two more provocative films, Romain Gavras' eco-politics satire Sacrifice and Pete Ohs' Warsaw-set sapphic romance Erupcja. 

The dynamic party girl seems to be aiming her incredible energy at movie stardom. Yet Erupcja proves a shrewd choice in this quest, as it's a slimly plotted character drama with few characters and nothing in the way of flashy spectacle. 

SEE ALSO: 'The Moment' review: Charli XCX reveals the hardships of pop stardom through a fake documentary

Essentially, there's nowhere for Charli to hide. Co-starring with Polish American actress Lena Góra, the pop star must not only create a stirring onscreen chemistry, but also a shoulder a story of romance that is electric and reckless. 

Props to Charli. She nails it. 

Erupcja offers an intriguing love triangle. 

In modern Warsaw, a British tourist named Bethany (XCX) and her boyfriend Rob (Will Madden) arrive for a romantic getaway. You see, Bethany claims Warsaw is more romantic than Paris. But while Rob is eager to plot a course of swoon-worthy activities leading to a proposal, Bethany seems distracted. Unbeknownst to her beau, Bethany's been here before. Several times, actually, and in each of them she got ensnared with a local florist named Nel (Góra). 

Before she even knows Bethany is back, Nel seems to sense a change in the air. Who they are to each other will spill out over a fitful few days of stolen hours, hard drugs, and smirky sapphic longing. However, voiceover from an omniscient narrator (Jacek Zubiel), who is frank and nonjudgmental about these mixed-up lovers, gives sharper context of how these two collide and repel like magnets being flipped over.

As they bounce from nightclubs to house parties to Nel's apartment, they collide with other free spirits, like American painter Claude (Jeremy O. Harris). Meanwhile, poor Rob is repeatedly left in the dust, bewildered. 

Charli XCX is mesmerizing in Erupcja. 

Ohs, who last helmed the wry dark comedy The True Beauty of Being Bitten by a Tick, builds a romance that is surreal and earthy, in the way of the French New Wave. His lovers are not glamorous or falling into dynamic or dreamy sex scenes. They're bumping around Warsaw with passion but little direction, fitting for the way his films are made. 

Once he's chosen a location, Ohs casts actors who will become collaborators in building the story scene by scene. He's got an outline, and then he, his crew, and the cast build while shooting. In this case, this makes for scenes that are clumsy but intimate, as if we're voyeurs, spying on a couple with more to say than either would ever dare. Góra and XCX create characters who share a wild streak, but have very different style and energy. 

Don’t miss out on our latest stories: Add Mashable as a trusted news source in Google.

Guarded, Nel projects a gives-no-fucks attitude, but is quick to expose her soft heart when love comes up. She believes in second chances — and third chances and even fifth chances. And Bethany will take them all.

In unremarkable baggy T-shirts and shorts, Bethany has a cool confidence, but it quavers when a smiling, oblivious Rob proposes one agenda after another. Through the narrative voiceover that helps give subtle scenes of little dialogue more shape, one thing becomes very clear: Bethany is not in Warsaw for Nel as much as she's there to run away from Rob. 

Erupcja relishes those romances not made to last. 

The Polish-language title translates to "eruption," reflecting the strange phenomenon that helps Nel and Bethany's relationship burst forth again and again. Every time they get together, a volcano erupts. It's a bizarre joke between them that allows to escape their boring routines and everyday choices and be wild, reckless, and free. 

While Rob begins as an almost comically clueless boyfriend, Ohs and his ensemble give space for him to be a fleshed-out figure, whose heartbreak hits as Nel and Bethany reconnect. In that, both women have a chance for self-reflection. Is what they have fated? Is it a series of flings? Is it romantic? Toxic? Both? 

Shot with the kinetic yet poised cool of the French New Wave, this Polish production feels timeless. Its scenes playing out with enough specificity for audiences to hook in, but enough ambiguity that they can feel like a dream. There's a touch of fairy tale to that. Ohs keeps his characters curious and fluid, refusing to shove them into easy-to-define roles of hero and villain. Instead, Erupcja embraces the feral nature of love, messy and wondrous. 

In the end, Erupcja is a thundering rumble of drama and romance, leaving its audience excited and rattled. 

UPDATE: Mar. 10, 2026, 2:29 p.m. Erupjca was reviewed out of the World Premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival. It is now playing the SXSW Film and Television Festival.

Taylor Sheridan's latest Paramount+ show, The Madison, is scheduled to premiere on Saturday, March 14, 2026. Written and created by Sheridan, the star-studded drama series is headlined by Michelle Pfeiffer and Kurt Russell.

TL;DR: Live stream France vs. England in the 2026 Six Nations for free on ITVX. Access this free live stream from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.

The 2026 Six Nations has been entertaining, unpredictable, and packed with real drama this year. It's all coming to a head this weekend as the final round of games decide where the trophy ends up. It was looking like France were heading to a Grand Slam victory until Scotland produced an incredible performance to overcome Les Blues at Murrayfield Stadium.

Now France need to beat England with a try bonus point to guarantee the Six Nations crown. England aren't exactly on top form right now, but they've upset the odds against France before. They couldn't do it again, could they?

If you want to watch France vs. England in the 2026 Six Nations for free from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

When is France vs. England?

France vs. England in the 2026 Six Nations starts at 8:10 p.m. GMT on March 14. This fixture takes place at the Stade de France.

How to watch France vs. England for free

France vs. England in the 2026 Six Nations is available to live stream for free on ITVX.

ITVX is geo-restricted to the UK, but anyone can access this free streaming platform with a VPN. These handy tools can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to a secure server in the UK, meaning you can unblock ITVX from anywhere in the world.

Live stream France vs. England from anywhere in the world by following these simple steps:

1. Subscribe to a streaming-friendly VPN (like ExpressVPN)

2. Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

3. Open up the app and connect to a server in the UK

4. Visit ITVX

5. Live stream France vs. England for free from anywhere in the world

Opens in a new window Credit: ExpressVPN ExpressVPN (1-Month Plan) $12.99 only at ExpressVPN (with money-back guarantee) Get Deal

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but most do offer free-trials or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can watch France vs. England without committing with your cash. This isn't a long-term solution, but it does give you enough time to stream most of the 2026 Six Nations before recovering your investment.

If you want to retain permanent access to free streaming services from anywhere in the world, you'll need a subscription. Fortunately, the best VPN for streaming live sport is on sale for a limited time.

What is the best VPN for the 2026 Six Nations?

ExpressVPN is the best choice for bypassing geo-restrictions to stream live sport, for a number of reasons:

• Servers in 105 countries including the UK

• Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

• Strict no-logging policy so your data is secure

• Fast connection speeds free from throttling

• Up to 10 simultaneous connections

• 30-day money-back guarantee

A two-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $68.40 and includes an extra four months for free — 81% off for a limited time. This plan includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee. Alternatively, you can get a one-month plan for just $12.99 (with money-back guarantee).

Live stream France vs. England in the 2026 Six Nations for free with ExpressVPN.

Download any dubious games from Steam over the past few years? You very well could've downloaded malware onto your computer — and now FBI wants to know about it.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Seattle division is currently seeking out potential victims of games sold on Steam with hidden malware. The agency has set up a form that gamers can fill out here.

According to the agency, threat actors targeted Steam users between May 2024 and January 2026. The FBI has already identified a number of Steam games that turned out to have malware embedded: BlockBlasters, Chemia, Dashverse/DashFPS, Lampy, Lunara, PirateFi, and Tokenova.

The FBI's form asks for some basic information from anyone who thinks they've been targeted: their Steam username, what games they downloaded, and when.

The next questions allude to what the threat actors were doing once the malware was installed on a target's computer. Did someone contact you about downloading the game, or reached out unsolicited after the game was downloaded?

The FBI also wants to know if potential victims suffered any losses — whether in their bank accounts, their cryptocurrency stashes, their Steam inventory items, or other digital accounts.

The games infected with malware included shooters and platformers. Some were early releases, some pre-existing games — which were fine until an update included the malware.

Once the malware was on a target's computer, its programmers could steal a user's information or ruin their computer's functionality. The infected games were removed from the Steam platform as soon as they were discovered to contain malware.

While many of the games weren't very popular, at least one title, BlockBlasters, was reportedly responsible for $150,000 in crypto being stolen from a user's infected computer.

There are plenty of ways you can repurpose old tech to give it a new life. Sometimes, however, devices are so old as to be virtually useless for modern purposes, and if devices won't even turn on anymore, there's not much you can do with them. You may be able to sell old and broken devices for more than you think.

The internet has spent weeks debating Timothée Chalamet's now-viral comments about ballet and opera. The latest voice to enter the discourse: Steven Spielberg.

During a live podcast conversation at SXSW on March 13, the legendary director was reflecting on the communal power of moviegoing when he suddenly shouted out two of the oldest performing arts institutions. "It happens in movies. It happens in concerts. It happens in ballet and opera!" Spielberg said, prompting cheers and whoops from the audience.

Spielberg was describing what he sees as the uniquely communal experience of the arts — the feeling of gathering together with strangers in a dark room and emerging united after the story ends.

SEE ALSO: 17 SXSW movies you need to know about right now

"The real experience comes when we can influence a community to congregate in a strange, dark place," he told Sean Fennessey, host of The Big Picture podcast. "At the end of a really good movie experience, we are all united… There’s nothing like that."

The moment immediately echoed the online controversy surrounding Chalamet, who sparked backlash earlier this year after dismissing ballet and opera in a recent interview.

While promoting Marty Supreme at a February town hall hosted by Variety and CNN alongside Matthew McConaughey, Chalamet joked about the challenge of keeping movie theaters alive in a changing entertainment landscape.

"I don't want to be working in ballet or opera, or things where it's like, 'Hey, keep this thing alive,' even though it's like, no one cares about this anymore," Chalamet said at the event, before adding, "All respect to the ballet and opera people out there."

The comments quickly went viral and drew pushback from across the performing arts world. New York City Ballet principal dancer Tiler Peck wrote on Instagram that the idea "no one cares about ballet or opera anymore" couldn’t be further from the truth, highlighting the artists, musicians, and stage crews who dedicate their lives to the craft.

Ballet star Misty Copeland also weighed in, noting that while opera and ballet may not dominate pop culture in the same way films do, their cultural impact has endured for centuries. "There’s a reason that the opera and ballet have been around for over 400 years," she said.

So when Spielberg praised those same art forms during his SXSW keynote conversation — and the crowd erupted in approval — the moment landed as more than just a passing comment. In the context of the internet's ongoing Chalamet saga, it felt like a gentle correction.