Mashable
NYT Strands hints, answers for June 26
If you're reading this, you're looking for a little help playing Strands, the New York Times' elevated word-search game.
Strands requires the player to perform a twist on the classic word search. Words can be made from linked letters — up, down, left, right, or diagonal, but words can also change direction, resulting in quirky shapes and patterns. Every single letter in the grid will be part of an answer. There's always a theme linking every solution, along with the "spangram," a special, word or phrase that sums up that day's theme, and spans the entire grid horizontally or vertically.
SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on MashableBy providing an opaque hint and not providing the word list, Strands creates a brain-teasing game that takes a little longer to play than its other games, like Wordle and Connections.
If you're feeling stuck or just don't have 10 or more minutes to figure out today's puzzle, we've got all the NYT Strands hints for today's puzzle you need to progress at your preferrined pace.
SEE ALSO: Wordle today: Answer, hints for June 26 SEE ALSO: NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for June 26 NYT Strands hint for today’s theme: Fowl businessThe words are animal-related.
Today’s NYT Strands theme plainly explainedThese words are hunted animals.
NYT Strands spangram hint: Is it vertical or horizontal?Today's NYT Strands spangram is horizontal.
NYT Strands spangram answer todayToday's spangram is Game Birds
Featured Video For You Strands 101: How to win NYT’s latest word game NYT Strands word list for June 26Pheasant
Game Birds
Quail
Grouse
Goose
Turkey
Patridge
Looking for other daily online games? Mashable's Games page has more hints, and if you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now!
Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.
Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Strands.
Wordle today: Answer, hints for June 26, 2025
Oh hey there! If you're here, it must be time for Wordle. As always, we're serving up our daily hints and tips to help you figure out today's answer.
If you just want to be told today's word, you can jump to the bottom of this article for today's Wordle solution revealed. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.
SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable SEE ALSO: NYT Connections today: Hints and answers for June 26 Where did Wordle come from?Originally created by engineer Josh Wardle as a gift for his partner, Wordle rapidly spread to become an international phenomenon, with thousands of people around the globe playing every day. Alternate Wordle versions created by fans also sprang up, including battle royale Squabble, music identification game Heardle, and variations like Dordle and Quordle that make you guess multiple words at once.
Wordle eventually became so popular that it was purchased by the New York Times, and TikTok creators even livestream themselves playing.
What's the best Wordle starting word?The best Wordle starting word is the one that speaks to you. But if you prefer to be strategic in your approach, we have a few ideas to help you pick a word that might help you find the solution faster. One tip is to select a word that includes at least two different vowels, plus some common consonants like S, T, R, or N.
What happened to the Wordle archive?The entire archive of past Wordle puzzles was originally available for anyone to enjoy whenever they felt like it, but it was later taken down, with the website's creator stating it was done at the request of the New York Times. However, the New York Times then rolled out its own Wordle Archive, available only to NYT Games subscribers.
Is Wordle getting harder?It might feel like Wordle is getting harder, but it actually isn't any more difficult than when it first began. You can turn on Wordle's Hard Mode if you're after more of a challenge, though.
SEE ALSO: NYT's The Mini crossword answers for June 26, 2025 Here's a subtle hint for today's Wordle answer:A proposal.
Does today's Wordle answer have a double letter?The letter F appears twice.
Today's Wordle is a 5-letter word that starts with...Today's Wordle starts with the letter O.
SEE ALSO: Wordle-obsessed? These are the best word games to play IRL. The Wordle answer today is...Get your last guesses in now, because it's your final chance to solve today's Wordle before we reveal the solution.
Drumroll please!
The solution to today's Wordle is...
OFFER.
Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be a new Wordle for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.
Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.
SEE ALSO: NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for June 26Reporting by Chance Townsend, Caitlin Welsh, Sam Haysom, Amanda Yeo, Shannon Connellan, Cecily Mauran, Mike Pearl, and Adam Rosenberg contributed to this article.
If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.
Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Wordle.
Lowest price in months: This curved Samsung gaming monitor is under $140 at Amazon
SAVE $90: As of June 26, the Samsung 27-inch S39C Series FHD curved gaming monitor is on sale for $139.99 at Amazon — that’s 39% off its regular price of $229.99.
Opens in a new window Credit: Samsung Samsung 27-Inch S39C Series FHD Curved Gaming Monitor $139.99 at Amazon$229.99 Save $90 Get Deal
If you’ve been eyeing a gaming monitor upgrade but don’t want to drop serious cash, here’s a great opportunity to save. Amazon has slashed the price of the Samsung 27-Inch S39C Series curved gaming monitor down to just $139.99, a wallet-friendly deal that’s showing up ahead of Prime Day. That’s a full $90 off and a limited-time offer that’s recommended to grab while it’s hot.
This 2024 model combines sleek design with features tailored for both gamers and entertainment lovers. Its 1000R curved screen promises to wrap around your field of vision in a way flat panels simply can’t match, helping reduce eye fatigue for those longer sessions. Samsung even cites clinical research from Seoul National University to back up the claim: the closer the curve is to 1000R, the more strain is reduced.
SEE ALSO: Amazon is dropping way better early Prime Day TV deals than years priorBeyond the curve, it’s packed with thoughtful tech. Flicker-Free technology and Eye Saver Mode are built in to keep your eyes fresh, while a 75Hz refresh rate and AMD FreeSync help smooth out motion during gameplay. It looks like a solid pick for casual and competitive gamers alike.
On the entertainment side, the built-in 5-watt speakers mean fewer cables and less clutter. Just connect via HDMI or DisplayPort and you’re ready to stream, game, or multitask. And thanks to the frameless display and slim metal stand, the whole setup can look clean and modern on any desk.
Whether you're grinding through an indie game backlog, getting a session of Fortnite in, or looking for a more immersive binge-watching setup to check out Season 4 of The Bear, the S39C can get the job done without draining your Prime Day budget. Just don’t sit on it too long: this is a limited-time offer and could vanish fast.
If you want to complete your living room setup at the same time, the 4-Series Amazon Fire TV is over $100 off ahead of Prime Day. To keep your home clean whilst gaming, check out the early Prime Day deals on Roomba vacuum cleaners as well.
The best early Prime Day deals, hand-picked by Mashable's team of experts-
Apple AirTag (4-Pack) — $74.99 (List Price $99.00)
-
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 (Wi-Fi, 40mm, S/M Green) — $199.99 (List Price $299.99)
-
Dyson V15 Detect Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (Yellow/Nickel) — $649.99 (List Price $749.99)
-
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-inch Laptop — $849.00 (List Price $999.00)
-
Hisense 55" Class QD6 Series (2025 Model) QLED 4K UHD TV — $259.99 (List Price $379.99)
Score the Roborock Qrevo Edge robot vacuum for its best-ever price before Prime Day
SAVE $500: As of June 26, the Roborock Qrevo Edge robot vacuum and mop is on sale for $1,099.99 at Amazon. This is 31% off its list price of $1,599.99 and marks a return to its lowest-ever price.
Opens in a new window Credit: Roborock Roborock Qrevo Edge Robot Vacuum and Mop $1,099.99 at Amazon$1,599.99 Save $500 Get Deal
There have been some mighty good deals on cleaning equipment lately at Amazon, even before Prime Day officially kicks off. Robot vacuums, in particular, have seen some great discounts. Among the many great offers available is the Roborock Qrevo Edge robot vacuum and mop, which is back to its best price at the retailer.
The Roborock Qrevo Edge robot vacuum and mop is on sale right now for $1,099.99. This is 31% off its usual price of $1,599.99, allowing you to save $500.
SEE ALSO: Are you 18-24? Get 6 months of Amazon Prime for free ahead of Prime Day.Boasting 18,500 Pa suction, the Roborock Qrevo Edge can tackle any hair, dirt, debris, and whatever else has dropped on your floor. Its Dual Anti-Tangle System makes cleaning up longer hair and pet hair easy as well, so nothing will get tangled up in the device. And when it comes to mopping, it ensures every corner around a room gets clean with the help of the FlexiArm Side Brush. Its dual spinning mops will help to get a deeper clean, too.
On top of that, the Roborock Qrevo Edge can map out a good layout of your home thanks to PreciSense LiDAR technology. This provides real-time mapping so the robot vacuum can find the best cleaning route around any obstacles in your home that might get in its way.
Amazon has the Roborock Qrevo Edge robot vacuum and mop marked as a limited-time deal right now, so if this discount has caught your eye, you'll want to act fast to pick it up at this price.
Are you hoping to check out more deals during the Amazon Prime Day sale event? Check out our breakdown of everything you need to know about Amazon Prime Day 2025 to start planning ahead.
The best early Prime Day deals, hand-picked by Mashable's team of experts-
Apple AirTag (4-Pack) — $74.99 (List Price $99.00)
-
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 (Wi-Fi, 40mm, S/M Green) — $199.99 (List Price $299.99)
-
Dyson V15 Detect Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (Yellow/Nickel) — $649.99 (List Price $749.99)
-
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-inch Laptop — $849.00 (List Price $999.00)
-
Hisense 55" Class QD6 Series (2025 Model) QLED 4K UHD TV — $259.99 (List Price $379.99)
This half-price robot vacuum is changing the game — save over $300 before Prime Day
SAVE OVER $300: As of June 26, the Shark AI Ultra voice control robot vacuum is on sale for just $297.99 at Amazon, marked down from $599 — a massive 50% off in a limited-time early Prime Day deal.
Opens in a new window Credit: Shark Shark AI Ultra Robot Vacuum $297.99 at Amazon$599 Save $301.01 Get Deal
If your floors are crying out for help and your hands are tired of doing the dirty work, Amazon’s latest limited-time deal could be perfect for you. Right now, you can score the Shark AI Ultra voice control robot vacuum for just $297.99 — that’s half off its usual $599 price tag. It's one of the steepest markdowns we've seen on a high-performance robot vac like this ahead of Prime Day.
The Ecovacs Deebot N30 Omni robot vacuum is also on sale at its lowest-ever price at Amazon, but this deal saves you even more.
SEE ALSO: Dyson's V11 Origin cordless vacuum is over $100 off ahead of Prime DayThis isn’t your basic bot either. The Shark AI Ultra packs a serious punch when it comes to suction, picking up dirt, pet hair, and everyday messes from carpet and hard floors alike. Thanks to its Matrix Clean Navigation feature, it doesn’t just roam around randomly — it promises to clean in a precision grid, going over dirt multiple times for thorough, edge-to-edge coverage.
What’s more, it empties itself. The XL self-empty base holds up to 60 days of debris, and unlike other models, it’s bagless — with no ongoing costs or weird refill systems either. It’s built for pet owners in mind as well, with a self-cleaning brushroll that’s designed to lift hair without wrapping or clogging. Its smart features continue with the vacuum using 360-degree LiDAR to map your home, avoid obstacles, and adapt its route whether it's day or night. It also plays nice with Alexa and Google Assistant, so you can tell it to clean up with just your voice.
If you’ve been waiting to upgrade your cleaning game, this is a deal worth jumping on. At 50% off, the Shark AI Ultra is doing all the work — and saving you a ton while it's at it.
To upgrade your home even further, the 55-inch 4K Amazon Fire TV is over $100 off ahead of Prime Day. For listening to music while your new robot vacuum is cleaning around the house, the EarFun Air Pro 4 earbuds are on sale for just $63 as well.
The best early Prime Day deals, hand-picked by Mashable's team of experts-
Apple AirTag (4-Pack) — $74.99 (List Price $99.00)
-
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 (Wi-Fi, 40mm, S/M Green) — $199.99 (List Price $299.99)
-
Dyson V15 Detect Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (Yellow/Nickel) — $649.99 (List Price $749.99)
-
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-inch Laptop — $849.00 (List Price $999.00)
-
Hisense 55" Class QD6 Series (2025 Model) QLED 4K UHD TV — $259.99 (List Price $379.99)
The gigantic 85-inch Sony QLED 4K Bravia 9 TV is at its best-ever price at Amazon
SAVE OVER $800: As of June 26, the 85-inch Sony QLED 4K BRAVIA 9 TV is on sale for $3,998 at Amazon. This is 17% off its list price of $4,799.99 and marks a return to its lowest-ever price.
Opens in a new window Credit: Sony Sony 85-Inch Mini LED QLED 4K Ultra HD Bravia 9 TV $3,998 at Amazon$4,799.99 Save $801.99 Get Deal
Amazon Prime Day kicks off this year on July 8 and runs through July 11. If you've got a new TV on your mind but are waiting for the sale event to officially kick off, wait no longer. The good news is that Amazon has plenty of great deals available right now. One of the best we've come across so far is this discount on the massive 85-inch Sony QLED 4K Bravia 9 TV, which is back to its best price at Amazon.
Normally the 85-inch Sony QLED 4K Bravia 9 TV is listed for $4,799.99, but you can pick it up for $3,998 right now. This saves you over $800 and marks a return to its lowest-ever price, which is another win.
SEE ALSO: How to sign up for Amazon Prime ahead of Prime DayThis huge Sony Bravia 9 TV has plenty going for it. The 85-inch size can transform your living room into a mini movie theater, plus it features 4K resolution, Mini LEDs, QLED technology, and XR Triluminos Pro that ensures images on the screen look sharp and vibrant. To make for an even more immersive experience, it also comes with IMAX Enhanced, DTS:X.CRYSTAL CLEAR PICTURE, and both Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos to further enhance the images and sounds on your screen.
Treat yourself to an upgrade ahead of Prime Day with this great deal on the 85-inch Sony QLED 4K Bravia 9 TV at Amazon.
If you can't wait for the sale event to start this year, check out our breakdown of everything you need to know about Amazon Prime Day 2025 to learn more about start times, what's new for this year's sale event, and some of the best early deals.
The best early Prime Day deals, hand-picked by Mashable's team of experts-
Apple AirTag (4-Pack) — $74.99 (List Price $99.00)
-
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 (Wi-Fi, 40mm, S/M Green) — $199.99 (List Price $299.99)
-
Dyson V15 Detect Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (Yellow/Nickel) — $649.99 (List Price $749.99)
-
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-inch Laptop — $849.00 (List Price $999.00)
-
Hisense 55" Class QD6 Series (2025 Model) QLED 4K UHD TV — $259.99 (List Price $379.99)
What its like to go to an anti-dating apps social
It's a Tuesday night in Soho, London, and I'm standing in a room with 200 single people who are looking to meet new people.
I'm at a Bored Of Dating Apps (BODA) singles social, an event aimed at those who feel disillusioned with dating apps (who isn't?) and are in search of IRL connection.
Singles' nights are having a moment. With "swipe fatigue" on the rise, it's not difficult to see why offline events are taking off. 79 percent of Gen Z daters and 80 percent of millennial daters feel burnt out by dating apps, according to a 2024 Forbes study. In my 2025 non-fiction book The Love Fix, I explore the myriad reasons why dating feels so hard right now and why so many of us are feeling drained, rather than sustained, in our quest to find connection. "Hell-scape," "Hell. On Earth.," "Harrowing," "Soul-destroying," are just a few of the choice words people used to describe the current dating scene when I researched my book.
Singles nights across the U.S. and UK, are selling out and racking up waitlists. One popular event in London, "Dinner for 100," had over 3,000 applications for one of its events (which can only accommodate 100 people). So, what's all the fuss about? When BODA asked me to come along and host one of their singles socials, I thought I'd give it a whirl. I'd already dipped my toe in the offline dating pond, with a life drawing class for single people, and had found it a refreshing and restorative experience.
What is Bored Of Dating Apps AKA BODA?BODA was founded by freelance journalist Jess Evans in January 2022 who had just come out of a break-up which had left her heartbroken. Evans thought she'd set up an in-person dating social in her home city of Liverpool, UK. At the time, she envisaged it being a one-off event. "I was very much like, this is just going to be a bit of fun, it'll be a good laugh, and let's just see who turns up. I had no intention of making it into a business," Evans tells me. "All I wanted to do was meet someone. I just wanted to be off the apps."
After the breakup, Evans had launched straight back into swiping on the apps, and found the experience completely draining. "This is just, for me personally, was totally destroying my mental health, which just was not working for me." That first social attracted nearly 300 people, which Evans did not expect. "Honestly, I was terrified. I was a journalist by trade so I'd never put on an event in my life."
From there, Evans continued hosting Liverpool-based events before branching out to other UK cities and eventually launching different types of socials, such as yoga rooftop sunset events. Evans' original goal to meet someone in real life also had a happy ending. "This wasn't long after lockdown and COVID-19, so people were desperate for community, people were lonely (and still are), but particularly at that time, I felt really lonely, especially at weekends, and I had no single friends." This absence of single pals is a major strand of the BODA philosophy — the events aren't just about romance, they're about finding new single friends and a community of people who are in the same boat.
"I had no intention of making it into a business. All I wanted to do was meet someone. I just wanted to be off the apps." - BODA founder Jess EvansToday, BODA runs socials in London, New York, Amsterdam, in addition to a number of UK cities: Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Leeds, Sheffield, Glasgow, and Guildford. There are supper clubs, bookshop meet-cute sessions, sober socials, coffee shop meet-cutes, drinks socials, sauna socials, paddle boarding, yoga, dances, and hikes.
What to expect while attending a BODA socialAs I made my way to my first ever BODA social, I must admit I felt a bit nervous. I'd picked out a cute outfit to wear — a black velvet dress (cue the inimitable Alannah Myles song), paired with a bold red lipstick. My role as host was to welcome every attendee as they arrived at The Little Scarlet Door, a bar in the heart of Soho, London.
I handed each guest two cards, the size of business cards. The first card entitles the attendee to a "Dutch courage shot" which can be redeemed at the bar for either an alcoholic or non-alcoholic shot. The catch is: you have to do the shot with a new connection — be it, romantic or platonic.
The second card is the "congrats you're fit" card. For the non-Brits, "fit" means "hot" in British slang. There's a space on the card for you to add your number — useful if you get chatting to someone who you'd like to keep in touch with. But, if handing over a card doesn't feel natural to you, it's perfectly fine to ask them for their number.
SEE ALSO: I got stood up. I refuse to let dating app culture break my spirit.I see a vast array of faces — some people attending with friends, and many more coming solo. 97 percent of attendees attend alone, which might feel a little bit nerve-wracking, but ultimately it gives you a greater chance of stepping outside your comfort zone and talking to fellow singles at the event (which is kind of the whole point). Many admit that they're feeling nervous or a little unsure of what to expect. At this particular event, it's a bar social, so people are chatting by the counters, and sitting outside. It's heartening to see people making connections, hitting it off with people, swapping numbers and making plans to meet up again.
During my hosting experience, I met countless people who also felt nervous, or even vaguely terrified. I found it reassuring to know I wasn't alone in feeling a bit anxious about it all. Putting yourself out there takes vulnerability and confidence — you should feel proud of yourself for overcoming those fears and showing up.
Will I meet someone at a singles social?So, the burning question: did I meet anyone? Yes I did. I've attended a total of three BODA socials — once as a guest, twice as a host. Attending as a guest forced me to step outside my comfort zone — I was no longer hosting, I wasn't needed on the front door, so I had to get out there and mingle. I'll be honest: the introvert in me wanted to go hide in the bathroom and wait for the evening to be over. I had to give myself a mental pep talk: "Rachel, you are a 36-year-old woman in control of your life, you can talk to a few strangers in a bar." At my first BODA social I ended up exchanging numbers with someone, who I went on a few dates with. And at my second social (where I was attending as a guest), a guy asked me for my number. While none of those connections have led to anything long-term, it feels good to get out there and talk to people in real life, to feel proactive about dating, to get a break from the interminable sofa-swiping. Plus, it's always a nice boost to get approached by interesting people who want to get to know you.
It feels good to get out there and talk to people in real life, to feel proactive about dating, to get a break from the interminable sofa-swiping.Past BODA attendees often send Evans updates on relationships which started at BODA — there have been engagements, weddings, and many more happy endings. Evans ended up having her own meet cute at one of her socials. She met her partner Liam at one of her socials and the two of them will be getting married this week.
What's the gender ratio at a singles social?This is a question that's come up a lot when I talk about BODA and it's a very valid one. There's been much discussion about straight men's reluctance to show their faces at IRL dating events. As Moya Crockett writes in a piece for The Londoner aptly named "Where are all the men?", there's a number of reasons why hetero guys aren't as forthcoming as straight women: "Some men might be too embarrassed to ask their mates to go to a singles night together, and too intimidated to go alone." In the same piece, Crockett adds that many men have expressed their feeling that speed dating sounds a bit "cringey," that many guys "just want to go for a pint," while others "are sceptical about what they perceive as attempts to profit from their singledom."
Dating apps aren't exactly not-for-profit organisations, right? As I write in The Love Fix, "The big-bucks business of love existed long before the internet. In 1897, W. T. Stead – a newspaper owner and editor who later died on the Titanic – launched The Wedding Ring Circle, which published catalogues of single people in the area, listing their interests and hobbies."
At a recent BODA event, I had a particularly illuminating conversation with a straight man in his 30s who'd come along with a male friend. He told me that he wasn't nervous about being rejected at these events, but what did fill him with fear was the idea of being explicitly rejected in front of his friend. "Do you think that has something to do with masculinity?" I asked him. He didn't hesitate in confirming that it had everything to do with masculinity.
The tickets for each BODA event are split by gender — early bird female tickets, early bird male tickets, then general male and female tickets. Early bird tickets are £20, and general tickets are £25. The organisers aim to get a good gender split for each event — women's tickets tend to sell out sooner than the men's tickets, which organisers put down to men being last-minute ticket buyers. So, who exactly are the socials aimed at? Evans says, "BODA socials are inclusive to anyone of any sexuality."
"BODA is obv about romance, but friendship and community too, so that involves absolutely everyone coming together," she adds.
If you aren't necessarily looking to make new single friends, and are looking for a dedicated queer dating space, there are lots of LGBTQ singles nights popping up, such as Sappho Events, Hunbun's Love Lab, not to mention gay and lesbian speed dating events. And if bar socials aren't quite your scene and you're looking for sober dating, there are plenty of non-drinking socials to choose from: bookshop meet-cutes, coffee socials, to name a few.
From one single person to another: what have you got to lose?
Did the best Prime Day robot vacuum deal already drop? Save $50 on the iRobot Roomba Q0120.
SAVE $50: As of June 26, the iRobot Roomba Q0120 is on sale for $199.99 at Amazon. That's a 20% saving on the list price.
Opens in a new window Credit: iRobot iRobot Roomba Q0120 $199.99 at Amazon$249.99 Save $50 Get Deal
Prime Day deals are the perfect time for a big purchase like a robot vacuum, and with just two weeks until the sale officially kicks off, we couldn't be more excited. But if you're looking for an affordable deal right now, why not check out this latest Amazon deal on the iRobot Roomba Q0120, currently priced at under $200.
As of June 26, this robot vacuum is $50 off, now priced at $199.99.
SEE ALSO: Ahead of Prime Day, Amazon already has a ton of good robot vacuum dealsThis model has a three-stage cleaning system that delivers customizable suction for carpets and hard floors. It comes with smart navigation that vacuums in neat rows, dodges furniture, and steers clear of stairs or any other obstacles in your house. And if you have any hard-to-reach corners and edges, the Edge-Sweeping Brush kicks in, making sure no dust or dirt is left behind. It even has three power levels, depending on how much of a clean your floor needs or how much noise you want to reduce.
It's easy to use and control, with everything being controlled from the iRobot Home App, where you can do things like schedule cleans while you're away from home, check to see where it has cleaned, and set it to charge. And with up to 120 minutes of cleaning on one charge, if it doesn't manage your whole house, it'll return itself to the charging station to reboot.
Say goodbye to manual vacuuming and pick up this deal from Amazon now.
The best early Prime Day deals, hand-picked by Mashable's team of experts-
Apple AirTag (4-Pack) — $74.99 (List Price $99.00)
-
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 (Wi-Fi, 40mm, S/M Green) — $199.99 (List Price $299.99)
-
Dyson V15 Detect Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (Yellow/Nickel) — $649.99 (List Price $749.99)
-
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-inch Laptop — $849.00 (List Price $999.00)
-
Hisense 55" Class QD6 Series (2025 Model) QLED 4K UHD TV — $259.99 (List Price $379.99)
Im not waiting for Prime Day — save $60 on the best early Prime Day Kindle bundle
SAVE $60: As of June 26, this Kindle Scribe Essentials Bundle is on sale for $489.97 at Amazon. That's a saving of 11% on the list price.
Opens in a new window Credit: Amazon Kindle Scribe Essentials Bundle $489.99 at Amazon$549.99 Save $60 Get Deal
The Kindle Scribe bundle is back on sale, and we couldn't be happier with this pre-Prime Day treat. The Kindle Scribe was released last year and has quickly become a fan favorite in the Kindle lineup. Not only can you read your favorite books, but you can now take notes and write on books.
As of June 26, the bundle is priced at just $489.99 (for the 64GB model), down from $549.99. The deal comes with the Premium Pen so you can jot down notes and convert them to text as easily as writing in a notebook. Unlike the basic pen, this model comes with an eraser so you can quickly remove mistakes just by flipping the pen. It is also battery-free and works through a special power source embedded in the Kindle Scribe, so there is no need to charge it.
SEE ALSO: Kindle deals are sparse ahead of Prime Day — for nowWith the bundle, you also get a 9W power adapter and a plant-based leather folio to store it away. According to Amazon, the plant-based leather is made from 76% renewable bio-materials (non-GMO corn and viscose fiber from Forest Stewardship Council-certified sources) and 24% polyurethane. The jade is currently sold out, so the only color option is black.
Alongside its note-taking abilities, the Kindle Scribe has a 10.2-inch 300 ppi Paperwhite display, glare-free and ink-free. So, like the original Kindle, it's perfect for sitting outside in the sun or harsh lighting. And if you're someone who reads on the go a lot, the Scribe has the best battery life of any model, promising to last months on a single charge.
Start working through your TBR list with this fantastic deal.
The best early Prime Day deals, hand-picked by Mashable's team of experts-
Apple AirTag (4-Pack) — $74.99 (List Price $99.00)
-
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 (Wi-Fi, 40mm, S/M Green) — $199.99 (List Price $299.99)
-
Dyson V15 Detect Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (Yellow/Nickel) — $649.99 (List Price $749.99)
-
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-inch Laptop — $849.00 (List Price $999.00)
-
Hisense 55" Class QD6 Series (2025 Model) QLED 4K UHD TV — $259.99 (List Price $379.99)
NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for June 26, 2025
Connections: Sports Edition is a new version of the popular New York Times word game that seeks to test the knowledge of sports fans.
Like the original Connections, the game is all about finding the "common threads between words." And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.
If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for the latest Connections solution. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.
SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable What is Connections Sports Edition?The NYT's latest daily word game has launched in association with The Athletic, the New York Times property that provides the publication's sports coverage. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer.
If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.
Here's a hint for today's Connections Sports Edition categoriesWant a hint about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:
Yellow: Superstar
Green: Athletic bases
Blue: Tennis pros
Purple: Sporty place settings
Need a little extra help? Today's connections fall into the following categories:
Yellow: Prodigy
Green: New York City Sporting Venue
Blue: U.S. men to wind Wimbledon
Purple: Sports terms on the dinner table
Looking for Wordle today? Here's the answer to today's Wordle.
Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions.
Drumroll, please!
The solution to today's Connections Sports Edition #276 is...
What is the answer to Connections Sports Edition todayProdigy - PHENOM, SENSATION, WHIZ, WUNDERKIND
New York City Sporting Venue - BARCLAYS, CITI, MSG, YANKEE
U.S. men to wind Wimbledon - AGASSI, ASHE, MCENROE, SAMPRAS
Sports terms on the dinner table - FORKBALL, HOME PLATE, STANLEY CUP, SUPER BOWL
Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be new Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.
Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.
If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.
Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections.
NYT Mini crossword answers, hints for June 26, 2025
The Mini is a bite-sized version of The New York Times' revered daily crossword. While the crossword is a lengthier experience that requires both knowledge and patience to complete, The Mini is an entirely different vibe.
With only a handful of clues to answer, the daily puzzle doubles as a speed-running test for many who play it.
So, when a tricky clue disrupts a player's flow, it can be frustrating! If you find yourself stumped playing The Mini — much like with Wordle and Connections — we have you covered.
SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on MashableHere are the clues and answers to NYT's The Mini for Thursday, June 26, 2025:
AcrossFictional maker of the Little Giant Do-It-Yourself Rocket-Sled KitThe answer is ACME.
The answer is Vroom.
The answer is Agave.
The answer is Poser.
The answer is Entry.
The answer is Argon.
The answer is Coast.
The answer is Mover.
The answer is Emery.
The answer is Vape.
If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.
Featured Video For You The Wordle Strategy used by the New York Times' Head of GamesAre you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.
Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Mini Crossword.
Why I’d consider a Galaxy Z Flip 7 over an iPhone 17 this year
Apple has my heart (at least in terms of smartphone ownership), but if I were in the market for a new handset this year, Samsung provides some serious temptation.
My pink iPhone 16 is doing just fine, but plenty of folks out there will be left with a difficult choice in the latter half of this year: Which new phone should I get? Samsung has some exciting new foldables on the way in July, while Apple's iPhone 17 lineup is sure to launch around September. Officially, we don't know a ton about either device yet, but we know enough that I can say there are at least a couple of intriguing reasons to consider the upcoming Galaxy Z Flip 7 over the iPhone 17.
Let's get into them.
Why I'd consider a Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 over an iPhone 17 this yearFor the sake of clarity, the Z Flip 7 is the smaller of the two Samsung foldables. It folds into a compact clamshell shape, and the Z Fold 7 turns into a mini-tablet.
The Z Flip 7 is just more funFirst order of business: A clamshell foldable is just more fun than a regular smartphone. This is indisputable. It's ironclad logic.
Who doesn't love folding and unfolding a little thing periodically throughout the day? Those of you who aren't old enough to remember real flip phones may not understand, but there was an innate satisfaction in pulling one out of your pocket and almost violently flipping it open to answer a call. You felt like you were doing business.
Samsung's Z Flip series hasn't quite delivered on that particular front (opening the phone has traditionally taken slightly more effort than old flip phones did), but the fact of the matter is that a Z Flip 7 will be a conversation starter. People might even think you're more interesting for owning one. More importantly, your smartphone has an extra way to make you smile throughout the day, and foldables provide that in a way a regular iPhone wouldn't.
It can do things an iPhone can't An iPhone can't do this, at least not easily. Credit: Kimberly Gedeon/MashableProbably the most salient argument one could make in favor of a foldable versus an iPhone is that there's practical, everyday functionality built into the form factor that an iPhone can't reproduce.
I'm more of a Z Fold guy in this respect, as the bigger unfolded display is great for things like reading and streaming videos. But the Z Flip is no slouch here, either. The foldable shape allows for some neat features. Split-screen multitasking is a big one, allowing users to have two apps open on the inner display at once. On the outside, the exterior display can tip you off to important notifications without asking you to open your phone, which is nice for people who would rather not be staring at their phones at all times.
Samsung's Flip phones also offer increased versatility for photography, both of the regular and selfie varieties. You can partially unfold it, place the flat end on a table, and set the timer for self-shots, for example. Being able to set it down for photography also guarantees a level image...unless your table isn't level. If that's the case, that's your problem, not mine.
It might offer elite performanceThis last bit is speculative on my part, but it's reasonable to expect high-quality performance out of the Z Flip 7 because of what Samsung has been doing with its high-end phones this year.
Every phone in the S25 line, including the Ultra and the Edge, is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chipset that provides incredible benchmarking scores on top of reliable everyday performance. We don't know yet if either of Samsung's new foldables will be powered by the same chipset, though rumors point to that being the case with the Z Fold 7. I would bet, if that's the case, that the Z Flip 7 also has a Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chip inside.
Of course, the iPhone 17 will almost certainly perform well, too. It's just nice to know that anyone who opts for the cute lil' foldable might also get elite performance. A Samsung might also be better for those interested in T-Mobile's new cellular Starlink service, where dozens of Androids are supported a bit easier than the iPhone.
In the meantime, if you're also curious about the Samsung Z Flip 7, then I recommend tuning into the Samsung Unpacked event on July 9.
Judge in Kadrey v. Meta AI copyright case rules for Meta, against authors
Meta just won a major ruling in a landmark case about how copyright law and fair use applies to AI model training, the second such loss for authors this week. Just days ago, Anthropic won a fair use case as well.
Late Wednesday afternoon, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria denied the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment. At issue in the case: whether Meta's use of pirated books to train its Llama AI models violated copyright law. In the case, Richard Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc., authors including Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, Ta-Nehisi Coates, and Junot Diaz accused Meta of copyright infringement.
In the discovery phase of the case, internal Meta messages revealed that the company used pirated datasets with copies of 7.5 million pirated books and 81 million research papers, according to The Atlantic's LibGen investigation.
What may seem like a blatant theft for profit in the eyes of the authors is actually a much more complex deliberation in copyright law. It's undisputed that Meta torrented terabytes of pirated books, but its lawyers successfully defended this act under the fair use doctrine, which allows the use of copyrighted works in certain contexts. Kadrey v. Meta is one of dozens of copyright lawsuits against AI companies making their way through the U.S. court system. At the heart of these fights is a battle of values: the rights and livelihoods of artists versus technological innovation at all costs.
How the authors lost their fair use argumentOf the four fair use factors, the case mostly hinged on factor one, whether the use is transformative, and factor four, whether the use harms the existing or future market for the copyrighted work. Meta clinched factor one. "There is no serious question that Meta’s use of the plaintiffs’ books had a 'further purpose' and 'different character' than the books—that it was highly transformative," said Chhabria in his ruling. Relatedly, Anthropic won a fair use case on Tuesday, with U.S. District Judge William Alsup deeming its Claude models transformative.
So the bulk of the deliberation came down to the fourth factor, or market harms. Chhabria said the plaintiffs failed to successfully argue that Meta caused market harm, for example, by regurgitating verbatim excerpts of books, robbing authors of AI licensing deals, or diluting the market with AI-generated copycats.
"Meta has defeated the plaintiffs’ half-hearted argument that its copying causes or threatens significant market harm," said Chhabria. "That conclusion may be in significant tension with reality, but it’s dictated by the choice the plaintiffs made... while failing to present meaningful evidence on the effect of training LLMs like Llama with their books on the market for [AI-generated] books."
Chhabria's decision was forecasted during the oral arguments held on May 1. The judge grilled lead plaintiff counsel David Boies about his team's shortcomings in presenting the market harm argument. "Whether it's in the summary judgment record or not, it seems like you're asking me to speculate that the market for Sarah Silverman's memoir will be affected by the billions of things that Llama will ultimately be capable of producing," said Chhabria "and it's just not obvious to me that that's the case."
Chhabria even pushed Boies to argue more strongly for market harms, saying, "you lose if you can't show that the market for the copyrighted works that are being used to train the models are dramatically impacted."
Almost two months later, Chhabria made this decision final.
"We appreciate today’s decision from the Court," said a Meta spokesperson about the ruling. "Open-source AI models are powering transformative innovations, productivity and creativity for individuals and companies, and fair use of copyright material is a vital legal framework for building this transformative technology."
The copyright battle against AI companies will continueThe ruling does contain some good news for authors and artists, just not for the 13 authors involved in this case. Judge Chhabria emphasized that his decision isn't a precedent that applies to all such cases.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed. This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.Chhabria explained in his ruling that his decision was less about the fair use defense of using pirated books to train AI models and more about the shortcomings of the plaintiffs' argument. "The Court had no choice but to grant summary judgment to Meta," said the judge, before adding:
"This is not a class action, so the ruling only affects the rights of these thirteen authors—not the countless others whose works Meta used to train its models. And, as should now be clear, this ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta’s use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful. It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one."
Chhabria also said he believed "it will be illegal to copy copyright-protected works to train generative AI models without permission." On a possibly related note, this May, the U.S. Copyright Office released a pre-publication version of a highly anticipated report on copyright law and AI. The report concluded that training AI models on copyrighted works without permission is likely not fair use. However, the report came out days before President Donald Trump fired the head of the Copyright Office, so it’s unclear what impact this preliminary report could have on future cases.
Meta's fair use ruling is certainly a setback for authors and other creatives. But as Chhabria signaled, the fight is far from over.
Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.
NASA’s Mars rover proves these peculiar ridges have secrets to tell
NASA’s Curiosity rover has started drilling into a bizarre landscape on Mars that could upend assumptions about when the Red Planet truly dried out.
After a long drive, the Mini Cooper-sized robot reached a so-called boxwork region, where a gridlike pattern of ridges splays over six to 12 miles. For years, orbiters had observed this area from space but never up close.
Scientists had hypothesized before the rover arrived that the peculiar ridges formed with the last trickles of water in the region before it dried out for good. But mineral veins discovered in the boxwork suggest groundwater stuck around longer than anyone expected.
The bedrock between the ridges contains tiny white veins of calcium sulfate, a salty mineral left behind as groundwater seeps into rock cracks. Deposits of the material were plentiful in lower rock layers from an earlier Martian period. But no one thought they'd appear in the layer Curiosity is exploring now, which formed much later.
"That’s really surprising," said Curiosity’s deputy project scientist, Abigail Fraeman, in a statement. "These calcium sulfate veins used to be everywhere, but they more or less disappeared as we climbed higher up Mount Sharp. The team is excited to figure out why they’ve returned now."
SEE ALSO: Rubin Observatory's first images flaunt millions of galaxies. Take a look.Ancient Mars used to be wetter — flush with rivers, lakes, and maybe even oceans — but over billions of years, it turned into a dusty, cold desert. What’s unclear is when that shift happened and how long conditions suitable for life might have lingered. Curiosity’s new findings complicate what scientists thought they knew about the timeline.
The rover has spent more than a decade in Gale Crater climbing Mount Sharp, reading the rock layers like pages in a planetary chronicle. The layer it’s on now is chock-full of magnesium sulfates, salty minerals that typically form as water evaporates. That fits the narrative researchers had expected: This was supposed to be a chapter when Mars was well on its way to arid.
That's why a new sample Curiosity drilled this month, dubbed Altadena, could be enlightening. As the rover analyzes the boxwork's composition, scientists may gain a better understanding of how it formed, what minerals are present, and whether any clues about ancient single-celled microorganisms might be hidden there. The rover will drill more ridges in the coming months to compare them and evaluate how groundwater may have changed over time.
Bedrock between the boxwork ridges contains tiny white veins of calcium sulfate. Credit: NASA / JPL-Caltech / MSSSThe mission’s next targets lie farther into the boxwork region, where the patterns grow larger and more distinct. Curiosity will keep looking for organic molecules and other potential evidence of a habitable environment in Mars' ancient past.
The rover team has begun nicknaming features after places near Bolivia’s Salar de Uyuni, one of the driest, saltiest places on Earth. It's reminiscent of the Martian landscape Curiosity is sightseeing today.
"Early Earth microbes could have survived in a similar environment," said Kirsten Siebach, a rover scientist based in Houston, in an earlier statement. "That makes this an exciting place to explore."
Netflixs K-pop Demon Hunters review: Balancing demon-slaying with idol realness
In the world of K-pop Demon Hunters, saving the world is just another item in an idol’s busy schedule. But for the young women of Huntrix, a K-pop trio who double as supernatural warriors, the real battle isn’t with monsters. It’s with the pressures of perfection, the weight of expectation, and the question that haunts every performer: Who are you when the spotlight turns off?
Directed by Maggie Kang and Chris Appelhans, Netflix’s latest animated feature is vibrant, action-packed, and surprisingly heartfelt. Beneath its sparkly surface lies a story that understands the soul of K-pop, a genre built on duality — glamour and grit, fantasy and discipline, spectacle and sincerity. More than that, K-pop Demon Hunters is a smart, emotionally grounded celebration of Korean culture, idol group dynamics, and the power of finding your voice, even if you have to scream it through a demon portal.
SEE ALSO: The best Netflix movies of 2025 now streaming A supernatural storyline grounded in K-pop reality. They’re hot, they sing, they’re demons. The Saja Boys are literally draining us. Credit: NetflixNetflix’s K-pop Demon Hunters could’ve easily gone the way of camp parody or industry critique, but instead, the animated action-comedy threads the needle, embracing the spectacle of K-pop while digging deeper into the emotional and cultural core that makes it so powerful. The film follows Huntrix, a wildly popular K-pop girl group that also moonlights as demon slayers tasked with protecting the Honmoon, a golden-hued barrier that keeps demons from the human world.
Of course, Rumi, Mira, and Zoey also have to protect their idol image. Like many real-life groups, Huntrix functions as a carefully calibrated constellation of personalities. Rumi (voiced by Arden Cho) is the group’s powerhouse leader, driven and disciplined, with a voice that could level buildings (think TWICE’s Jihyo); Mira (voiced by May Hong) is the icy main dancer, cool and composed but hiding deeper vulnerabilities; and Zoey (voiced by Ji-young Yoo), the maknae and resident rapper from America, brings chaotic good energy and comic relief in equal measure. Together, they embody the familiar archetypes of K-pop stardom — but the film gives each one interiority, pushing past the image to reveal the person underneath.
SEE ALSO: Le Sserafim on tech, style, and staying connected in a digital worldThe soundtrack mirrors this layered approach. It blends original songs written for both Huntrix and their rival demon boy band, the Saja Boys, with real-world K-pop hits from EXO, TWICE, and even first-gen icons Seo Taiji and Boys. The result is a musical landscape that feels as expansive as K-pop's rich history.
At first glance, K-pop Demon Hunters is a fun, flashy premise built for a TikTok generation. But what makes K-pop Demon Hunters truly compelling is how it engages with the duality at the heart of idol-dom: the tension between public persona and private self, the intense pressure to be "perfect," and the strength it takes to keep showing up for your fans, your group, and yourself.
K-pop commentary with heart, not cynicism. And a whole lot of style. Mira and Zoey said: Heart eyes only. Credit: NetflixUnlike some recent Western takes on the music industry, K-pop Demon Hunters doesn’t reduce K-pop to a punchline. Instead, it treats the genre with sincerity and admiration, capturing both the magic and the machinery behind it. The film nods to the punishing schedules and image management that idols endure, but it never frames these as soul-sucking. (Well, until the Saja Boys show up... more on that later.) Rather, they’re part of a complex system that produces global stars and also lifelong bonds.
This is clearest in the way the story centers the group dynamics of Huntrix. Rumi, Mira, and Zoey aren’t just colleagues or stage partners — they're more like sisters. They fight demons and train together, but they also share ramen, tease each other backstage, and show up for one another when things get tough. Their friendship is the emotional backbone of the film, grounding even its most outrageous action sequences with warmth and authenticity.
Visually, K-pop Demon Hunters is a feast. The animation is dynamic and electric, bursting with bold textures and expressive flair. Characters emote big: Eyes turn into literal hearts, pupils pop like kernels of corn, and meme-like visual gags heighten the humor and emotional stakes in equal measure. It’s a style that feels delightfully unrestrained, drawing inspiration from anime, internet culture, and the kinetic energy of Spider-Verse-era pop art (K-pop Demon Hunters was also produced by Sony Pictures Animation). Whether it’s a high-octane demon battle or a backstage heart-to-heart, the animation enhances the emotional beats without ever feeling cluttered. Like K-pop itself, it’s meticulously crafted, slightly chaotic, and impossibly fun to watch.
Saja Boys: The soul-sucking boy band you'll still stan. Don't be fooled by their good looks! They'll suck your soul. Credit: NetflixEvery great girl group needs a worthy foil, and K-pop Demon Hunters delivers with the Saja Boys, a fictional boy band who are as heartthrobby as they are villainous. Styled with the swagger of MONSTA X and the media polish of a third-gen powerhouse like BTS, they’re instantly memeable, especially when they make their slow-motion entrance to EXO’s “Love Me Right,” hair tousled, eyes smoldering, abs rippling, evil intentions barely concealed.
That’s because these boys aren’t just Huntrix's industry rivals, they’re demons. Literally. Sent to the human world to seduce fans and drain their souls, the Saja Boys weaponize their good looks, honey-dipped vocals, and perfectly synchronized choreography to suck the souls out of anyone who dares to stan. It’s a brilliantly pointed metaphor: boy bands that feed off obsession, idol worship that consumes. The commentary is sharp, but it never veers into scolding — just a winking acknowledgment of how powerful and parasocial pop fandom can be.
And yet, like any good boy group, they’re hard to resist. Jinu (voiced by Ahn Hyo-seop), the group’s devilishly handsome, conflicted leader, has an undeniable spark with Rumi that hints at a deeper emotional arc, and his softening adds just the right amount of romantic tension to the story. The film smartly positions him not just as a villain, but as someone wrestling with identity, loyalty, and maybe even love.
It’s also telling how quickly the internet has latched onto the Saja Boys. Within the film’s world (and in real life), their popularity eclipses Huntrix almost immediately, yet another sly nod to the way boy groups often dominate mainstream attention, no matter how hard girl groups work to earn their place. From viral fan edits to spicy fan art, they’re already the internet’s newest obsession.
Real K-pop hitmakers make the music soar.Of course, no film about K-pop would work without killer music, and K-pop Demon Hunters understands the assignment. The original soundtrack, created in collaboration with producers from THEBLACKLABEL (home to Taeyang, Jeon Somi, and BLACKPINK), is genuinely impressive. Songs like "Golden" and "Takedown" wouldn’t feel out of place on a real idol group’s comeback album, with propulsive beats, dynamic hooks, and lyrics that tap into both the emotional highs and warrior-like tenacity of being an idol.
That’s thanks in part to K-pop singer-songwriter EJAE, who provides Rumi's singing voice and helped pen many of the film's original tracks. Her involvement brings a layer of authenticity to the film’s sound, blurring the line between fiction and reality. And looking at her IRL song credits ("Drama" by aespa, "O.O. by NMIXX, "Birthday" by Red Velvet), she knows a thing or two about writing a girl-group banger. It's no surprise that the songs on the soundtrack are already charting on Spotify.
She’s joined by Audrey Nuna (as Mira's singing voice) and Rei Ami (as Zoey's), both of whom bring their own vocal flair to the film's genre-hopping tracks.
K-pop Demon Hunters gets it right.What makes K-pop Demon Hunters so effective isn’t just that it nails the aesthetic; it gets the emotions right. It understands why fans keep showing up: for the bonds between members, the resilience behind the glamour, and the shared dreams that power it all. It’s a film that celebrates girlhood, creativity, and Korean identity without glossing over the costs of fame. And it does so while being genuinely, delightfully fun to watch.
For K-pop fans, there’s plenty to love, from the pitch-perfect idol archetypes to a scene-stealing variety show face-off between Huntrix and the Saja Boys. But even for the uninitiated, K-pop Demon Hunters is an accessible, wildly entertaining entry point into a global phenomenon that refuses to be boxed in. And yes — the soundtrack absolutely slaps.
The Bear Season 4 fails Tina
In its third season, The Bear turned its spotlight on chef Tina Marrero (Liza Colón-Zayas), with its "Napkins" episode centering her in a similar way to how Season 2's "Honeydew" and "Forks" centered on Marcus (Lionel Boyce) and Richie (Ebon Moss-Bachrach).
That focus granted viewers a new appreciation of the longtime Beef/Bear staff member. "Napkins" offered up a thoughtful look at Tina's daily routine before she came to work at The Original Beef of Chicagoland. Viewers met her family, ached for her as she struggled to find a new job, and likely teared up during her first meeting with Mikey Berzatto (Jon Bernthal).
SEE ALSO: 'The Bear's biggest problem is time: Full season reviewAbsolutely one of Season 3's strongest outings, "Napkins" pushed Tina to the forefront in a way that mirrored her new importance and purpose in the kitchen of The Bear. Colón-Zayas even went on to win an Emmy for Best Supporting Actress in 2024. (Eligibility-wise, the award was for her work in Season 2, but her performance in the far more recent Season 3 undoubtedly swayed voters' opinions.)
With Tina and Colón-Zayas both getting their flowers in Season 3, what new ways would Season 4 find to make them shine? What would be in store for Tina on her next steps on her culinary path?
The answer: pasta. Just... pasta.
For the entirety of The Bear Season 4 — which spans 60 days, according to the countdown clock in The Bear's kitchen — Tina has one goal, and one goal only: Turn a pasta dish around in under three minutes.
By the end of the season, she gets there, managing to make and plate a pasta dish in two minutes and 59 seconds. It's a professional victory for Tina, and a personal one too, given the amount of pressure she put on herself to overcome this obstacle. But also... that's it? After giving Tina more to do season over season, you're just going to stick her in pasta hell for all of Season 4? After the memorable highs of "Napkins," you're just going to relegate Tina to texting Sydney, "Mama this pasta is killing me" in the middle of the night? It's not just the pasta, this whole plotline is killing me!
Tina's one-note storyline this season — minus the "Mama this pasta is killing me" text, which might just be the comedic highlight of all of Season 4 — is a symptom of The Bear's broader pacing problems. Characters outside of Carmy (Jeremy Allen White), Sydney (Ayo Edebiri), and Richie (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) get very little to do, stuck in repetitive loops. Look no further than Gary (Corey Hendrix), still struggling with wine dates by the end of the season. Or Marcus (Lionel Boyce), whose winning of Best New Chef from Food & Wine rings hollow given that we barely know a thing about the pastries he's been making all season-long. But forget about giving these established characters any time! Every second counts, and we have to spend a good chunk of those seconds on Teddy Fak's (Ricky Staffieri) burgeoning relationship with Kelly (Mitra Jouhari), for some reason.
The minimizing of Tina is extra frustrating following her role in Season 3, not just because it diminishes her previously established importance, but because it also reframes "Napkins" in a worse light.
While "Napkins" provides important context to Tina's character, I was also underwhelmed by its use of flashback, writing in my Season 3 review, "The flashback format of the episode is disappointing: We've already seen Tina grow leaps and bounds as a chef and a person since the beginning of The Bear. Why can't we hone in on that growth as The Bear gets up and running? Why do we have to look to the past, when other character-centric episodes root us in the present?"
In my mind, as solid as "Napkins" is, and as great as Colón-Zayas is in it, setting Tina's episode in the past suggested The Bear had little idea of what to do with Tina in the present. Season 4 proves that. Instead of growing her further as a chef and a character, The Bear gives Tina one repetitive task and pushes her to the sidelines, which I assume smell like pasta. And as we all know, that pasta is killing her.
Frankly, if all I can remember about a key character's storyline is one text, then that pasta might just be killing the show too.
All episodes of The Bear Season 4 are now streaming on Hulu.
Did you catch the Michelin star man in The Bear Season 4? We did.
In The Bear Season 4, episode 1, Carmy Berzatto (Jeremy Allen White) reaffirms his quest for The Bear to get a Michelin star. After all, if the restaurant earns one, the recognition could bring in more customers and save The Bear from financial ruin.
SEE ALSO: 'The Bear' Season 4 wastes everyone's time: Full season reviewBy the end of Season 4, The Bear has not heard whether they've earned the Michelin star. The lack of follow-through on this key plot point is just one of many ways in which Season 4 drops the ball on any kind of pacing and urgency, even though The Bear's crew are staring down a two-month doomsday clock reminding them of the restaurant's imminent closure. But every second counts, right?
Still, the Michelin star plotline wasn't entirely abandoned, because the show hints pretty hard that a Michelin inspector visited The Bear.
In Season 4, episode 3, after Richie (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) gives a dining party the surprise of a sandwich from the Chicago Beef, he briefly connects with another impressed customer (Gary Janetti).
"You have a bunch of mind readers in here," the customer says, going on to praise Sydney's (Ayo Edebiri) new scallop dish and The Bear's "excellent vibe."
Later, he catches sight of Richie's other big surprise: turning the outside of the Beef sandwich window into a winter wonderland so that a recently cancer-free diner traveling in from Los Angeles can experience a Chicago snow in person. It's clear the customer Richie spoke to is touched by the display, which is a good thing, because he's definitely the Michelin inspector.
First, the show's outsize focus on an unnamed diner hints pretty hard that he's someone important. Second, the show drops a major, Chicago-specific hint about his role.
SEE ALSO: 'The Bear' Season 4 does Tina dirtyIn Season 4, episode 2, The Bear's staff strategizes over how to spot a Michelin inspector. According to the former Ever staff and real-life Chicago restaurateur Donnie Madia (playing himself), no one knows who the inspectors are, but there are signs. Sometimes they fiddle with their reservation at the last second, or bring a celebrity as a distraction.
"You do hear things, though," Madia says. "Like they use a weird last name. Like a street in the city they're visiting."
What name does the mystery diner's driver call him as she comes to pick him up from the restaurant? None other than Mr. Clark — and Clark is a major street in Chicago! Case closed, Janetti's customer is the Michelin inspector Carmy and his team were so dreading serving.
The good news is that the inspector appeared impressed with his experience at The Bear. He enjoyed the food and the atmosphere, plus he got to witness some of Richie's surprises. Maybe he'll dock points for Richie securing him an extra sandwich from the Beef, since Madia advised staff not to pamper the Michelin inspector more than they would a usual guest. But it seems like Richie truly didn't know and was just providing a nice service, so maybe the inspector will let it slide.
The bad news? The inspector's visit has no bearing on the rest of the season. Instead, a late visit by a Food & Wine critic ends up having more of an impact.
I'm sure Michelin will come back into play in a potential Season 5. However, to front-load the season with mentions of it only never to circle back is a massive failure of pacing, as well as a sign that The Bear is confused about its own priorities. At least we'll always have that Clark Street Easter egg.
The Bear Season 4: All the new and returning guest stars
Warning: Contains major spoilers for The Bear Season 4.
The Bear is a show that loves its famous guest stars, and Season 4 is no exception.
This season sees a mixture of new and returning faces, with some of the big names we saw in Season 2's "Fishes" episode making another appearance, and other new and very famous faces joining them for an episode or two.
From Francie Fak finally being unveiled to a recurring role for a very famous director, we've broken down all the Season 4 guest stars below.
New guest starsBrie Larson as Francie FakIn the buildup to the wedding of Tiff (Gillian Jacobs) and Frank (Josh Hartnett), it's apparent that we may finally get a glimpse of Francie Fak — a character that Natalie (Abby Elliott) has long had beef with, even though we're never told why. Sure enough, Francie is indeed at the wedding in episode 7, and she's played by none other than Captain Marvel herself, Brie Larson. The two of them rage at each other for a while, then ultimately make amends. (It's still not entirely clear why they fell out in the first place.)
Rob Reiner as AlbertRob Reiner, legendary director of two of the all-time greatest Stephen King adaptations (Stand By Me and Misery), has a recurring role in Season 4 as Ebraheim's (Edwin Lee Gibson) business mentor, Albert. Albert helps Ebraheim come up with a plan to franchise The Beef sandwich shop by expanding into new territories.
Danielle Deadwyler as ChantelDanielle Deadwyler (Till, Station Eleven) has a starring role opposite Sydney (Ayo Edebiri) in episode 4 (the same episode Edebiri co-wrote with Lionel Boyce), playing a hairdresser who's also a longtime friend of Sydney's.
Kate Berlant as an AI-Anon memberComedian Kate Berlant only has a short scene at the start of episode 5, where she plays a member of the Al-Anon group that Carmy attends. But she absolutely crushes the monologue she does have, which is about her experience of leaving her brother — a recovering addict — at home by himself while she has to go out of town.
Alpana Singh as a sommelierIn episode 2, budding sommelier Sweeps (Corey Hendrix) visits a restaurant to get a wine lesson from another sommelier. The twist is the woman in question is actual real-life sommelier and restauranteur Alpana Singh.
Returning guest starsThere's no John Cena this season, but there are a lot of returning guest stars, many of whom appear at Tiff and Frank's wedding in episode 7.
Sarah Paulson as Michelle BerzattoCarmy's cousin Michelle (Sarah Paulson), who let him stay with her in New York after that nightmarish Christmas in Season 2's "Fishes", attends Tiff's wedding. She can't stay long, but she's in a few scenes with Tiff and the rest of the family.
John Mulaney as StevieMichelle's partner Stevie (John Mulaney) is in top comic-relief form in episode 7, helping the Faks pitch one of their quirky business schemes to Pete (Chris Witaske) and taking part in an amusing exchange with Syd and Carmy about the latter's time in New York.
Bob Odenkirk as Uncle LeeOne of the most moving scenes in episode 7 comes courtesy of a less-fiery Uncle Lee (Bob Odenkirk), the same man who had that horrendous argument with Mikey back in the "Fishes" episode. This time Lee finds Carmy hiding out in the kitchen, and shares some poignant words about the things Mikey used to tell him about his brother.
Jon Bernthal as Mikey BerzattoSpeaking of Mikey, Jon Bernthal is also back in Season 4, appearing in an opening flashback with Carmy that reveals where the idea for The Bear's name came from.
Jamie Lee Curtis as Donna BerzattoDonna (Jamie Lee Curtis), the troubled and terrifying matriarch of the Berzatto family, has several key moments in Season 4. She's briefly at the wedding in episode 7, where she shares a surprisingly tension-free conversation with Sydney — and then she has a large role in episode 9 opposite Carmy, trying to make amends for her past behavior.
Will Poulter as LucaPastry chef Luca (Will Poulter), who trained with Marcus (Lionel Boyce) back in Denmark in Season 2, has a recurring role in Season 4 as a stage at The Bear — basically, he's a glorified unpaid intern. As such, Luca helps Marcus with the desert station.
The Bear Season 4 ending, explained: Where do we go from here?
Warning: Contains spoilers for The Bear, Season 4.
After a lot of waiting around for characters to do things in Season 3, Season 4 of The Bear has a lot more stuff happening — from the literal ticking clock of the restaurant running out of money to Carmy's (Jeremy Allen White) quest to get a Michelin star.
And while the show's cliffhanger this time around isn't quite as abrupt as the one in Season 3, there is still a lot to unpack about how things end for the characters. Below, we've recapped what happened and speculated on what it might mean — and what comes next.
What happens in The Bear, Season 4?The Bear itself isn't in a great place at the start of Season 4. The restaurant's first review from the Chicago Tribune (the review Carmy reads in the Season 3 finale) was a very mixed bag, with the resulting patchy press leading Uncle Jimmy (Oliver Platt) and Computer (Brian Koppelman) to install a countdown clock in the kitchen that shows exactly how long the team has to turn things around before they run out of money.
Things are looking bleak, but Carmy still holds out hope of getting a Michelin star and saving the restaurant. Meanwhile Sydney (Ayo Edebiri) is still struggling with the decision of whether to leave The Bear for Ever, Richie (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) is coming to terms with the stepdad (Josh Hartnett) in his daughter's life, Marcus (Lionel Boyce) weighs up reconnecting with his dad, Ebraheim (Edwin Lee Gibson) wants to expand the success of the sandwich shop, and Tina (Liza Colón-Zayas) is attempting to cook a pasta dish in under three minutes (yes, this is her entire Season 4 storyline).
What happens at the end of The Bear, Season 4?The final episode of the season takes place almost entirely out the back of the restaurant, just after the clock has run out during the latest shift. Carmy makes the decision to quit The Bear for the good of the restaurant, sparking a heated argument between him, Sydney, and Richie that eventually leads to a deeper conversation about Carmy's brother Mikey (Jon Bernthal) and the wake of his death. It's a pivotal moment in the relationship between Carmy and Richie, in particular, with the shouting finally giving way to an honest sharing of emotion and apparent reconnection.
But Carmy's mind about quitting is still made up, and Sydney makes him a deal — she'll stay, rejecting Ever's chef de cuisine offer, provided Sydney, Richie, and Carmy's sister Natalie (Abby Elliott) are added to The Bear's ownership paperwork. Carmy agrees. In the final scene, Natalie arrives, Carmy tells her he's going to quit, and she hugs him.
Will the restaurant stay open in The Bear?This is the big question of Season 4's finale. All the planning about whose name is going to be on the paperwork won't mean anything unless The Bear is actually able to stay in business, and the restaurant's numbers — despite an improvement over the season — still aren't looking great.
At the end of episode 8, with the clock about to run out, Natalie sits down opposite Computer to have a frank conversation about the state of The Bear.
"How long can you pay them?" Computer asks.
"We got a day left on the parachute," Natalie responds.
"How inspiring. What then?"
"Then it's what we bring in every night. We have a reduced payroll, we have a reduced menu, we can cover both."
Carmy quitting will reduce the payroll, and Sydney has already shown that she's able to effectively trim down the complexity of a menu and save money. But our best guess? The biggest help for The Bear will come from two other places: The chance of a surprise Michelin star (who is that mysterious diner in glasses, Mr Clark, from episode 3?) and the possibility of The Beef sandwich shop expanding into a franchise thanks to the work Ebraheim does with his new business mentor (Rob Reiner) throughout the season.
Is Carmy really going to quit The Bear?In the season finale, Carmy says he's quitting because it's the best thing for the restaurant — but in this case, it may also be the best thing for him. As he explains to Sydney and Richie, Carmy wants to take time away from the kitchen to work on himself — and honestly, it's about time.
"I don't know what I'm like, Richie," Carmy says. "Like outside of the kitchen, I don't know what I'm like."
It's clear that although cooking was once his main purpose, Carmy has taken other steps towards personal growth this season. In addition to Richie, he's reconnected with both Claire (Molly Gordon) and his mother Donna (Jamie Lee Curtis), conversations that mark important steps for a character who's spent previous seasons avoiding his own emotions.
Our best guess for Carmy in Season 5, should The Bear be renewed? We think he'll still be a big part of the show (Allen White is the Emmy-winning protagonist after all), but — initially at least — he'll be going on a journey of self-discovery outside the restaurant's walls.
Do Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses work as an accessibility device?
The Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses were first unveiled in 2023, the result of a collaboration between sunglasses company Ray-Ban and tech giant Meta, owner of Facebook and Instagram. Appealing to the fashion-conscious tech nerd, the voice-operated wearable not only allows users to take photos and make calls hands-free, but can also use AI to describe a user's surroundings.
SEE ALSO: Meta partners with Be My Eyes for accessible Ray-Ban glasses upgradeThough the Ray-Ban Meta was not designed as an accessibility device, its features may cause some to wonder whether it could moonlight as an accessibility device for people with low or limited vision. As such, Mashable spent a few days testing whether the gadget could be reappropriated for this purpose.
Unfortunately, while it is a novel device, relying on the Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses to help you navigate the world would be foolhardy at best.
What are Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses? Credit: MetaThe Ray-Ban Meta glasses boast a relatively compact form factor which looks very much like Ray-Ban's eyewear designs, with customers able to choose between Wayfarer, Skyler, and Headliner styles. The glasses utilise Meta's large language model Meta AI to answer users' queries, with a five-microphone system which can pick up voice commands while suppressing background noise. They also have small open-ear speakers designed to minimise audio leakage, and include a built-in 12 MP camera which can take photos and record video.
Despite its high-tech innards, the most noticeable visible difference between the Ray-Ban Meta and standard Ray-Bans is the missing metallic detail at the temples. Instead, the Ray-Ban Meta substitutes in a camera lens on the left and a notification light on the right (this activates when a photo or video is being taken, an effort to address concerns about privacy and covert surveillance).
At around 49 grams depending upon the frame selected, the Ray-Ban Meta's weight isn't outside what one may expect for a pair of sunglasses, though it's certainly on the heavier side. It is slightly bulkier than standard Ray-Bans, particularly at the arms (the right of which includes touchpad controls), but still streamlined enough that observers likely won't notice.
What accessibility features do Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses have for people with low or limited vision? Credit: MetaRay-Ban Meta glasses are targeted at the average consumer, rather than catering specifically to people with disabilities. Even so, Meta does state that the glasses can be used to help people with "reduced vision, hearing, or mobility by offering the ability to perform tasks hands free." Users can also have their Ray-Ban Meta glasses fitted with prescription lenses, with the option to upload a valid prescription with a power ranging between -6.00 and +4.00 when ordering a pair.
The Ray-Ban Meta glasses are primarily operated by voice commands to Meta AI, requiring the app to be installed to your phone and connected to the device. The glasses can also be connected to Messenger, WhatsApp, or a users' phone via said app, which is needed to enable users to send messages and make calls using voice commands. This may help users conduct such tasks without having to look at their phone screen, however it's worth noting that both iPhone and Android can already be operated directly via voice commands without Meta AI.
Ray-Ban Meta users can also issue commands, such as asking Meta AI what they're looking at. The glasses will then take a photo and use Meta AI to analyse it, with AI-generated audio describing the scene to the user. Such images and conversation logs are saved to a user's History log in the Meta AI app, and can be shared to the public Discovery feed.
Ray-Ban Meta's Be My Eyes partnership connects users to volunteer helpersAside from this voice command functionality, the Ray-Ban Meta feature most specific to people with disabilities is its partnership with Be My Eyes. This free service connects users with low or limited vision to volunteers who will look through the Ray-Ban Meta's camera and describe the person's surroundings. According to Be My Eyes, it is "the first and only accessibility tech for blind or low vision users available on Meta AI Glasses."
The Be My Eyes app does work without Ray-Ban Meta, with users simply pointing their phone cameras at whatever they want described. As such, people who primarily want to take advantage of this free service could just download the app to their phone rather than shelling out a few hundred dollars for the Ray-Ban Meta. Using Be My Eyes with the Ray-Ban Meta requires users to download the app and connect it to the Meta AI app anyway.
However, the Ray-Ban Meta glasses do enable users to use Be My Eyes hands-free. They may help frame shots as well, as users merely have to direct their gaze toward whatever it is that they want described to them. Whether it's worth picking up the Ray-Ban Meta to assist in accessibility may depend on how often a user utilises Be My Eyes. Even so, Meta states that the glasses have just four hours of battery life with moderate usage, which means that wearing them all day in order to repeatedly use Be My Eyes may not be realistic. Be My Eyes is also only available in the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia, and Ireland, and only supports the English language.
Meta AI isn't intended to be an accessibility device, and it shows Credit: Amanda YeoUnfortunately, aside from its Be My Eyes functionality, the Ray-Ban Meta glasses seem largely unsuitable as an accessibility aid. While Mashable found them an interesting novelty at least (though the Meta AI app's Discovery feed felt like the quiet death of humanity), relying on these glasses to help you navigate the world is an impractical proposition.
As previously mentioned, the Ray-Ban Meta glasses can describe a user's surroundings when asked. However, such responses are relatively vague and don't appear useful for orienting yourself unless you're so lost that you can't tell whether you're in a car park or a playground. For example, Meta AI responded to one query by telling me that I was "looking at the interior of a train, specifically the seating area." While this was true, it wasn't terribly useful information, and missed the display I was facing, which indicated where the train was going.
Credit: Amanda YeoWhen asked to read a sign bearing a single word, Meta AI was able to do so. As such, it may be useful to help someone determine the appropriate bin to throw their waste in, for example. However, asking it to read an article open on a computer screen produced unsatisfactory results. Looking at the first paragraph of my colleague Belen Edwards's article "The 10 best TV shows of 2025 (so far), and where to stream them," I requested my Meta RayBan glasses read it to me. The result was a bizarre mix of text out of order, with some lines skipped altogether. When I scrolled down and asked it to continue reading, it would simply recite the text it had already read.
Asking again on another day produced even less accurate results. Instead of reading the text, Meta AI offered a vague description of what it seemed to think the article was about. Repeated requests produced different results each time, with Meta AI sometimes even telling me "the text reads" before offering an inaccurate approximation of the text.
Further tests on a later date showed improved accuracy, with Meta AI reciting much of the article visible on screen. Even so, it still took liberties with the text, inventing a headline and referencing fake shows "The Pilt" and "The Iceberg." After I scrolled down and asked Meta AI to continue reading, it stated that it "can only provide general information, and [is] not able to read articles in real-time."
Being able to simply look at any screen and have Ray-Ban Meta glasses smoothly read it out would theoretically be a boon to many users with low or limited vision. Unfortunately, people who need such assistance would be better off relying on dedicated screen readers for now.
News headlines get muddled by Meta AI Credit: Amanda YeoMashable's testing found the Ray-Ban Meta glasses' AI assistant also struggled when it came to matters that weren't literally in front of it. When we tried asking for the day's news headlines, Meta AI confidently offered a humorously incoherent response: "Here are the top three news. First, latest news and stories from around the world are available. Second, latest U.S. news updates are available. Third, latest news headlines are available." Repeating the question produced the same answer.
Asking for a specific publication might get you actual news items, however they may not be from the outlet you requested. While Mashable didn’t report on Jonathan Joss’ death, Meta offered this news as the top headline on the site at time of testing. It then offered Mashable’s coverage areas of "tech, culture, and everything in between" as a second ostensible headline, before again informing us that "the latest news headlines are available."
Requests for the New York Times' headlines fared better, producing news items that the publication had reported on. However, the given headlines seemed to have been paraphrased, and the information supplied was outdated at best. For example, Meta AI stated that "Israel appears ready to attack Iran," however the first story on the New York Times' website was "Israel Says It Attacked Headquarters of Powerful Iranian Military Unit." Further, while Meta AI stated that 242 people had been killed in a plane crash in India, the death toll had already climbed to 270 days prior to our inquiry.
I also tried asking Meta AI for a recipe for a vanilla cake. In response, it provided a list of ingredients and measurements which seemed to be in roughly the right proportions. However, it only partially fulfilled my request, as no instructions were provided. Once again, Meta AI demonstrated approximate knowledge of many things, but was still unable to offer useful, usable information.
Meta AI struggles with dinner and travel plans Credit: Amanda YeoMeta AI also struggled with more personally immediate matters. While it did suggest a nearby restaurant when asked for a "good place to go and get dinner in Sydney," Meta AI stated that it would be open until 10 p.m. that day. In actuality, the restaurant had been closed for months, which was reflected both on their Google Maps listing and Instagram page. Despite there being hundreds of operating restaurants in the city, Meta AI somehow managed to select one that had shut down.
The chatbot also fell short when asked to assist with travel plans. Requesting help getting around seems like an obvious and expected use of an AI assistant. Despite this, Meta AI was unable to assist when asked when the next train between two stations would arrive, stating, "I can't help with that yet, but I'm learning every day!" When asked for assistance with transport plans more generally, it told me to visit my local transport website to check the timetable. It couldn't advise if or when such features might be added either, telling me to check the Ray-Ban Meta Help Center.
Asking whether a train station was wheelchair accessible was hit and miss, with Meta AI bizarrely responding to my first request by offering the address for a KFC. Fortunately, subsequent inquiries produced more relevant answers, however considering the quality of previous responses, users will probably feel uneasy about blindly trusting Meta AI's word for it.
The Ray-Ban Meta may be an interesting toy, but it isn't an accessibility device Credit: MetaThe Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses aren't primarily marketed as an accessibility device. Actual medical devices designed to assist people with low or limited vision typically retail for a significantly higher price. For example, an OrCam MyEye 3 Pro will drain your bank account to the tune of $4,490, which is over 10 times the price of the most expensive Ray-Ban Meta glasses.
In light of this, it's unsurprising that the Ray-Ban Meta glasses underwhelm as an accessibility device for people with low or limited vision. While the Ray-Ban Meta glasses may assist users by enabling them to conduct tasks such as messaging, playing music, and taking photographs hands-free, they struggle when asked to interpret text in front of them and underperform when asked to provide information more generally. Like all generative AI algorithms, Meta AI simply can't replace going direct to reliable sources yourself.
If you just want to take a few hands-free photos and calls, the Meta Ray-Bans may have you covered. However, this gadget wasn't designed to be an accessibility device, and certainly should not be relied upon as such.