Blogroll

The Mercedes-Benz E-Class has spent decades setting the standard for luxury sedans. It's refined, packed with technology, and carries the kind of prestige that still draws buyers into showrooms.

Since I own a couple of SSDs that have passed the half-decade mark (the older one is pushing its first decade of service), I decided it was time for a quick health check to see if they're still in good working order and worth keeping.

Today, Pornhub sent a letter to various U.S. governors, attorneys general, and state reps, the company shared with Mashable. The letter details concerns over "performative, ineffective, and unenforceable" age-verification laws, calls for releasing data on how these laws protect children, and advocates for device-level filters.

Age-verification laws require submitting personal information — such as a facial scan or a government ID — to view certain content, typically explicit content. These laws have been enacted in around half of U.S. states since 2023, starting with Louisiana. Pornhub has blocked itself in most of these states due to the burden of complying.

SEE ALSO: What would ethical age verification look like online?

Meanwhile, initial research has suggested that age-verification laws don't work due to software like VPNs (which can hide someone's real location) and non-compliant websites.

In its letter, Pornhub mentions these pitfalls, as well as digital safety and privacy concerns.

The company sent the open letter to elected officials in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

"These laws demonstrably do not work and, as a result, have put your constituents' children and adults' personal data at risk. If you truly intend to protect minors online, you must acknowledge the facts and introduce a real solution," the letter states.

The solution Pornhub offers is mandating operating system providers like Apple, Microsoft, and Google to enable parental controls on the device level. Pornhub sent a letter to these tech giants in Nov. 2025, asking them to do so.

In the UK, Apple enabled device-level filters on devices with iOS 26.4, prompting Pornhub to reverse its decision to block the country back in May. The UK's age-verification law, the Online Safety Act, went into effect in July 2025.

Pornhub has experimented with this solution since April 2026 and found that it prevents minors from accessing adult content in the UK. VPNs also don't work to circumvent it. "It is our view that children in the UK using Apple devices with the most up-to-date version of iOS are benefitting from the strongest level of protection from age-inappropriate content online," the letter reads. "Your constituents deserve the same."

The company wrote that Apple, Microsoft, and Google should make this the default on all devices globally.

It also mentions the recent report from Ofcom, the UK's communications regulator, stating that current age checks "leave major gaps." It also mentions similar findings in Texas, where an online search for "free porn" showed that nine out of the top 10 search results had no age verification at all. (The latter findings are in an appendix in the letter.)

In Australia, which enacted a social media ban for children under 16 in December 2025, 85 percent of those teens are still using social media, according to a study published in June. Meanwhile, Pornhub states, "The longer this goes on, the longer these non-compliant sites are accessed by more minors and adults. As outlined by Lucy Faithfull Foundation, we know that when faced with age verification, some adults are choosing riskier, irresponsible sites to avoid age checks."

The letter also asks, "How many minors have been protected in the weeks, months and years since age verification laws have come into effect in your jurisdictions?" It asks for the officials to publicly release data about this, if such data exists

"Platform-by-platform age verification laws were designed to fail. These laws may be simple and attractive, but the evidence shows they are impossible to enforce at scale, easy to evade, weak at protecting minors and increase privacy risks for adults," the letter goes on, linking to various reports by The Independent and the BBC.

Pornhub finishes the letter, again asking for device-level filters. Free speech advocates have long called for this as a solution that doesn't infringe on adults' free speech rights.

Here is the letter in full:

Dear lawmakers,

We are writing to you because, as a community, we are deeply concerned about the harm being caused by the performative, ineffective, and unenforceable age verification laws you have taken part in passing despite your intention of protecting minors. Everyone subjected to these laws is more at risk than ever before of encountering online harm.

We are serious about protecting minors, and lawmakers like yourselves must recognize that these laws have failed at that objective. Voting for age verification laws that require hundreds of thousands of individual websites to collect personal information from every user, every time they want to access content restricted to adults, is dangerous.

These laws demonstrably do not work and, as a result, have put your constituents’ children and adults’ personal data at risk. If you truly intend to protect minors online, you must acknowledge the facts and introduce a real solution. You have the power and the responsibility to mandate operating system providers like Apple, Microsoft and Google to render all mobile phones, tablets and computers child safe by enabling parental controls at the source and by default.

You should be aware that in the United Kingdom, where they’ve introduced the Online Safety Act with the goal of making the UK “the safest place in the world to be online”, Apple has shown what meaningful action looks like. With a quick software update, Apple set a new benchmark for child safety that turned parental controls on by default for users who have not verified they are adults. This means making every phone or tablet kid-safe as a starting point. Adults can then verify their age once in their mobile phone settings, instead of every time they want to browse an adult website, use a dating app or scroll social media. It’s a more consistent, privacy-conscious, global approach to protecting children online than requiring every individual website or application to build and enforce its own age verification system.

Since April 2026, Pornhub has experimented with Apple’s solution and has seen it successfully prevent minors from accessing adult content websites in the UK. It is our view that children in the UK using Apple devices with the most up-to-date version of iOS are benefitting from the strongest level of protection from age-inappropriate content online. Adult sites are blocked by default, and VPNs do not work to circumvent these blocks. Your constituents deserve the same.

This is a big step for online safety that can go even further. We believe all device manufacturers, like Microsoft, Apple and Google – the three companies responsible for the operating system of 97% of mobile phones, tablets and computers currently in use around the world, should make this the default setting on all devices globally. Because clearly, more could and should be done. Your role here is to mandate them to do it by including this in their next software updates.

For nearly a year, Ofcom, the UK internet regulator, has monitored and collected data. Like your existing laws, the UK Act relies heavily on adults repeatedly submitting personal information, such as a driver’s licence, facial scan, or credit card, to access lawful content. Ofcom has now released its first six-month implementation report. Its findings make clear that site-by-site age checks leave major gaps. “Since January 2026, the number of services in the top 100 with age assurance in place has decreased steadily, as services without age assurance become more popular.” Ofcom also noted that site-by-site rules can “inadvertently strengthen the market position of non-compliant firms.” In other words, dangerous websites that are breaking the law by refusing to implement any kind of age assurance are benefitting from the law by winning traffic over from the compliant websites that have.

None of the age verification laws that have been passed in any of your jurisdictions are working or can effectively be enforced. An excellent example of this exists in the UK. Ofcom is one of the world’s strongest online safety regulators, but it has been given an impossible mandate. This outcome was predictable: responsible platforms comply, while non-compliant operators remain discoverable, gain traffic and continue exposing minors to age-inappropriate content. And this is not unique to the UK. For example, in Texas, where age verification was introduced in September 2023, a simple online search showed 9 out of the top 10 search results for “free porn” had no age verification at all.

This issue does not only apply to adult content laws. Since December 2025, kids under the age of 16 in Australia have been prohibited from having social media accounts. However, three months after the ban more than 85% of teenagers are still using social media. Search results are constantly replenished with new, non-compliant sites, demonstrating how easily new players can enter the market. This revolving door means the internet remains wide open to unmoderated, unverified and potentially unsafe content, regardless of how many times authorities attempt to crack down.

The longer this goes on, the longer these non-compliant sites are accessed by more minors and adults. As outlined by Lucy Faithfull Foundation, we know that when faced with age verification, some adults are choosing riskier, irresponsible sites to avoid age checks. According to the Free Speech Coalition, “Less than 5% of consumers actually go through with age-verification for adult content. When confronted with a request for a facial scan and government ID, most consumers simply hit the back button and find a non-compliant site outside the mandate or log on to a VPN.” The internet is global and it's impossible to patrol millions of different sites based in hundreds of different countries. Site-based regulation is always going to encourage evasion.

We can no longer accept laws that create the appearance of action while failing to address the challenge of keeping kids safe online. It is particularly concerning when these laws drive regulated business out of your jurisdictions and aid in creating a lush market for bad actors online, when a viable solution exists today.

Phones, tablets and computers could start as kid-safe devices by default, where only verified adults would be able to disable safeguards designed to protect minors from age-inappropriate content, including pornography. This method protects minors without requiring adults to surrender unnecessary personal information to multiple websites. It also avoids creating systems that are easily circumvented through tools like VPNs. Some governments and major technology companies recognize that kid-safe phones can provide a more consistent and privacy-protective way to help keep minors away from age-restricted content.

How many minors have been protected in the weeks, months and years since age verification laws have come into effect in your jurisdictions? The public deserves to see the data on how these laws are protecting children and reducing access to age-inappropriate content. We don’t believe such data exists. Platform-by-platform age verification laws were designed to fail. These laws may be simple and attractive, but the evidence shows they are impossible to enforce at scale, easy to evade, weak at protecting minors and increase privacy risks for adults.

We urge you to focus on putting into action policies that produce measurable improvements in child safety rather than legislation that grabs headlines. The technology exists. A precedent exists. The responsibility now lies with you to pursue solutions that truly protect children across the entire internet. We are determined to be part of this solution and want to collaborate with government, civil society and tech partners to arrive at an effective kid-safe-by-default solution.

Signed,

Pornhub

Google Maps is on so many phones that it's hard to get away from it. For most people, it's never really been a choice; it's just the default. You open it, type a destination, and assume it's giving you the most useful route with the most honest results. I made that assumption for years, but lately I've noticed things that make it really annoying and untrustworthy, even if you change the settings.

When Avatar: The Last Airbender premiered on Nickelodeon in 2005, no one could have predicted that nearly two decades later, one of its characters would still be one of the internet's favorite fictional boyfriends. Yet here we are.

Since Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender arrived on Paramount+ and in select theaters, my TikTok algorithm has developed a singular obsession: making sure I see adult Zuko in all his gorgeous, danmei-esque glory. Not clips from the movie. Edits. Slowed down. Zoomed in. Color graded to perfection.

The same handful of shots appear over and over, each transformed by a different corner of internet culture. There's the now-ubiquitous Doja Cat "Jealous Type" edit (see examples here, here, and here). Others swap in Sabrina Carpenter or Britney Spears. Another pairs Zuko with the viral audio of increasingly frantic cats meowing — the universal soundtrack for fictional men so attractive they short-circuit your brain. Another opts for barking dogs instead. One creator dissolved into tears trying to explain how unfairly good adult Zuko looks. Honestly? I understood every word.

On X, the reactions are even less restrained. "Zuko is so sexy just sitting there looking ripped af and his hair in a bun," one viral post reads. Another declares, "Adult Zuko is so hot and sexy. I'd take on the world just to have him."

SEE ALSO: I let fancams dictate what I watch

The internet, it seems, has once again reached a consensus. Unfortunately, many of these edits don't survive for very long. As copyrighted clips from the film, they're often removed almost as quickly as they go viral.

Legally, that makes sense. Practically, it's a little harder to understand. Because by the time an edit disappears, it's usually already done exactly what great marketing is supposed to do. It's racked up hundreds of thousands of views. It's inspired TikTok stitches and reaction videos. It's filled the comments with people asking where the clip is from or admitting they've never watched Avatar before but suddenly want to.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed. This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Studios spend millions trying to convince audiences to care about a movie. Meanwhile, fans are doing it organically, one 20-second edit at a time. In 2026, the edit has become the trailer.

One of my own friends has tried to get into the original Avatar series more than once. It never clicked. But after days of TikTok serving her edit after edit of hot Zuko, she texted asking if I'd take her to see the movie in theaters.

That's the magic of internet fandom. It doesn't just keep beloved characters alive — it keeps introducing them to people who somehow missed them the first time around.

What's happening with Zuko speaks to something bigger than a viral thirst trend. It's a reminder that some characters never really leave the internet. They get passed from platform to platform, generation to generation, finding new audiences through fan edits, memes, fan art, and recommendations powered more by fandom than by marketing.

Dante Basco, who voiced teenage Zuko in the original series, has watched that happen in real time. Speaking to Fandom for the show's 15th anniversary in 2020, Basco described Avatar as "so timeless" and said he was happy that "a new generation is discovering it now." He also noted that the fanbase never really disappeared, saying fans were "always continually following it and cosplaying."

That enduring enthusiasm helps explain why the arrival of an official adult Zuko has taken over social media. The movie may have given fans new footage, but it didn't create the fascination. It simply reignited one that has quietly been thriving online for nearly two decades. It doesn't hurt that adult Zuko is voiced by another internet boyfriend: Steven Yeun.

Long before "book boyfriend" entered the mainstream lexicon and before TikTok perfected the art of the thirst edit, Zuko dominated Tumblr dashboards, YouTube AMVs, fanfiction archives, cosplay conventions, and GIF sets. Fans wrote essays dissecting his redemption arc, created fan art imagining his future as Fire Lord, and spent years debating every step of his journey. As Dante Basco told Fandom, fans still regularly approach him to say Zuko has "one of the greatest redemption arcs in history."

That devotion isn't an accident. In fact, Zuko almost didn't exist. On the Avatar: Braving the Elements podcast, co-creator Bryan Konietzko recalled that Zuko emerged after Nickelodeon executive Eric Coleman suggested the series needed "someone who's going after them the whole time." Konietzko's response: "Can he have a scar?"

The creators also knew from the very beginning where his story was headed. "It's in the series bible," Konietzko said. "We knew that Zuko was going to become Aang's teacher."

That long-game storytelling is part of what makes Zuko endure while so many animated characters have faded into nostalgia. He's not redeemed overnight. He stumbles, backslides, betrays the people trying to help him, and ultimately has to choose, over and over again, the person he wants to become. His emotional vulnerability, dry sense of humor, and hard-earned growth make him the kind of character audiences can root for.

"We love the villain who's been hurt and who is given the opportunity to come back from that," said Janet Varney, who voices Korra, during the same podcast conversation. Konietzko agreed, noting that even he sees Zuko as someone with "an amazing redemptive arc."

He's also incredibly editable. Every glance, every fight scene, every quiet moment carries emotional weight because fans already know where his story leads. A well-made edit can communicate that emotional journey in under 30 seconds, even to someone who's never watched an episode.

That's part of what's changed about fandom in the TikTok era. Character edits have quietly become one of the internet's most effective recommendation engines. Instead of convincing viewers to watch an entire series, they convince them to care about one character. The rest often follows.

For years, studios have tried to figure out how to introduce older franchises to new audiences. Increasingly, the answer is powered by fandom.

A compelling edit can do what traditional marketing often can't: make someone emotionally invested before they've watched a single scene. We've seen it happen across pop culture. A fancam introduces someone to a K-pop group. A TikTok revives a decade-old song. An anime edit sends viewers rushing to Crunchyroll. The algorithm has become one of the internet's most powerful discovery engines, constantly resurfacing stories for audiences who missed them the first time around.

Zuko is perhaps the clearest example of how that cycle can last for decades. Ironically, Paramount spent months trying to keep Avatar Aang footage offline after the film leaked earlier this year. Now that the finished film is finally streaming, it's fans, not the studio, who are generating the clips everyone wants to watch.

The creators of Avatar Aang have described the film as a chance to revisit Team Avatar at "this precipice between adolescence and adulthood," reconnecting with characters who have grown up alongside the audience that first fell in love with them.

But if TikTok is any indication, fans didn't need much convincing to come back.

That's why the flood of "hot Zuko" edits feels like more than a fleeting social media trend. They're evidence that fandom itself has become part of a franchise's longevity. Characters no longer live only within the stories that created them. They continue evolving through the internet, where fans remix and reintroduce them to thousands of potential new viewers.

And if my friend finally watches Avatar because TikTok convinced her to give a scarred Fire Nation prince a chance? Honestly, I don't think she'll be the first. And judging by my For You page, she definitely won't be the last.

Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender is now in select theaters and streaming on Paramount+.

As SUVs continue to dominate showroom floors, it's easy to forget just how much value a well-engineered family sedan can offer. For buyers who prioritize low running costs, long-term reliability, and everyday comfort over extra ride height, a midsize sedan often delivers a better ownership experience while costing significantly less to buy and operate.

Women receive no shortage of safety advice. Cover your drink. Share your location. Avoid walking at night alone. Text when you get home.

Here is one they may not hear every day: If you think someone wearing smart glasses is secretly recording you, start playing a Disney song.

The advice has begun circulating on LinkedIn, Threads, and other social channels as more people use Meta's smart glasses to covertly film women, prank service workers, and post unsuspecting strangers online. The theory, known as "copyright hacking," is that YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, or another platform will recognize the copyrighted music and prevent the resulting video from being uploaded.

"Because Disney music is more protected than women," one X user wrote. She's not completely wrong.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

It sounds like the kind of internet hack that is equal parts clever and depressing. Women are already taught to modify their behavior in response to new risks. Now, as ordinary-looking glasses make it easier to turn a private interaction into public content, they are being handed another instruction.

While this specific piece of advice may be new, the tactic itself is not.

Would playing Disney music actually work? This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

The theory is based on YouTube’s real copyright system.

YouTube uses an automated tool called Content ID to compare uploaded videos against audio and video submitted by copyright holders. When the system detects a match, the owner can decide whether to monetize the video, track its performance, or block it.

The important part is that not every match results in a takedown. YouTube says monetization is the most common policy applied to music claims. In those cases, the video stays online, but some or all of its advertising revenue may go to the copyright holder.

The rules are stricter for certain Shorts. YouTube says vertical videos between 1 and 3 minutes are blocked when they receive an active Content ID claim. Even then, however, an uploader could shorten the video, remove its sound, replace the audio, or use editing software to separate the speakers’ voices from the background music.

TikTok can similarly mute a sound that violates copyright restrictions without removing the video's visual content. The uploader can then replace the missing audio with another sound.

So yes, playing a Disney song could make a video harder to post or less profitable, and might even get it blocked — but that's not guaranteed.

Social media users were quick to point out the practical problems with this methodology.

"If you are being secretly recorded, how do you know to play the songs?" one user asked on a viral Facebook post by author and content creator Tova Leigh. Others noted that the person wearing the glasses could simply post the footage without sound.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

That first question gets at the larger flaw: Meta's Ray-Ban glasses are designed to look like conventional eyewear. The person being filmed may never realize a camera is pointed at them, and even if they notice the small recording light, they’d still need to recognize what it means, reach for their phone, and start playing music before the interaction ends. By that point, they may have already become the content.

Women may not know they are being filmed

The Disney advice is spreading as more women describe discovering that seemingly ordinary encounters were actually being recorded for an online audience.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

In February, CNN reported on the rise of "manfluencers" who use smart glasses to film themselves approaching women in airports, grocery stores, gyms, and other public spaces. To the woman involved, the interaction may feel like a stranger starting a conversation. For the creator, it is an opportunity to produce a video for thousands, or even millions, of viewers.

One woman, a DJ and producer who goes by Manic Muse online, said she gave her number to a man who approached her in a Texas grocery store because she believed their conversation was genuine. Her sister later suggested that his glasses might have contained a camera.

"And in that moment, my heart fell to my stomach," she told reporters.

Manic Muse said she messaged the man, asked whether he had recorded her, and told him not to post the interaction. He stopped replying and uploaded it anyway. The video eventually received more than 23 million views.

"It’s just so violating," she added. "I didn’t consent to being secretly recorded, and I definitely didn’t consent to becoming content for millions of strangers.”

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Once the footage is online, the recording itself is only the beginning. Viewers may scrutinize the woman's appearance, sexualize her, criticize how she handled the interaction, or search for personal information. What she believed was a private conversation with one stranger can be repackaged as evidence of whether his pickup technique "worked."

The technology has helped creators build entire accounts around people who never agreed to participate. As Mashable previously reported, smart-glasses users have covertly filmed attempts to get women's phone numbers in many public spaces. Other accounts have featured recordings of women’s bodies, sexually suggestive visits to massage parlors, and pranks targeting retail and restaurant employees.

Former prank creator Brad Podray, previously known online as Scumbag Dad, told us in January that women and service workers are often selected precisely because they can provide usable reactions while being less able or willing to challenge the person recording them.

"They want people who are good on camera, so they’re going to hit fast food employees, and they’re going to hit pretty girls," Podray said. "A lot of random women walking around aren’t going to want to participate in a skit if you ask them to, so they remove the agency entirely by just running the glasses."

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Meta has attempted to make the recording less discreet. Its glasses include a white LED that signals the camera is operating. But users have also found ways to interfere with it. Stickers designed to conceal the indicator have been sold online, and people in at least 30 states have offered services that physically modify it, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Though Meta has put safeguards in place to make the glasses harder to manipulate, they do not solve the broader consent problem. A person can see the light without understanding what it means. In many cases, they may not even see it.

Police have tried the Disney defense, too

This is not the first time someone has tried to turn copyright enforcement into a shield against a camera.

In April 2022, a Santa Ana, California, police officer played Disney songs while a YouTuber recorded officers investigating a stolen vehicle in his neighborhood. "You've Got a Friend in Me" from Toy Story played through a police vehicle's speakers late at night. It was followed by "We Don’t Talk About Bruno" from Encanto, "Reflection" from Mulan, and "Un Poco Loco" from Coco.

When Santa Ana City Councilmember Johnathan Ryan Hernandez asked the officer why he was playing it, the officer pointed toward the person recording.

"Because it will be copyright infringement for him," the officer said in a statement. The department also said playing music while officers were being recorded was not part of its recommended policy.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Still, the Santa Ana incident was part of a pattern that had already appeared in several other departments.

In February 2021, Beverly Hills police officers were recorded playing songs including Sublime's "Santeria" and the Beatles' "Yesterday" during encounters with activist Sennett Devermont. Devermont had been livestreaming his attempts to obtain information and body-camera footage from the department.

The timing suggested the officers might have been attempting to activate Instagram's copyright filters, which can interrupt livestreams or limit how the resulting video gets shared. The Beverly Hills Police Department responded similarly, stating it doesn’t recommend officers play music while being filmed.

A few months later, an Alameda County sheriff’s sergeant played Taylor Swift's "Blank Space" while activists recorded him outside a courthouse in Oakland. This time, the officer explicitly explained what he was doing. "You can record all you want," he said. "I just know it can't be posted on YouTube." A department spokesperson later acknowledged that the attempt had backfired.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

The practice also surfaced in Illinois. In an incident report obtained by Motherboard later that year, an officer wrote that he had been "recently advised" to turn on music when he encountered a woman recording him. That detail suggested the tactic was no longer simply occurring to individual officers in the moment; in at least one department, someone appeared to be passing it along as advice.

Platforms are starting to act, but only after the fact

Recording someone in public is not universally illegal in the United States. Laws vary by state, and additional restrictions can apply to audio recording, sexual imagery, stalking, harassment, and the commercial use of someone's likeness. But in general, people have weaker expectations of privacy on a sidewalk, in a park, or in other public places.

Nowadays, though, recording can also violate a platform's rules. Instagram head Adam Mosseri said last week that the platform would remove smart-glasses videos showing people being exploited or harassed.

Meta confirmed that two prominent accounts posting smart-glasses pickup content had been deactivated for violating its harassment policies. Both had amassed more than 1 million followers.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

The crackdown creates a clearer consequence for some of the most abusive accounts, but it does not guarantee the removal of every video made without consent. Instagram has focused its policy on harassment and exploitation, leaving a large gray area for recordings that are invasive but do not clearly meet either definition.

More importantly, moderation generally begins after the footage has already been posted. The person recorded must first discover the video, locate the account, report the content, explain the violation, and wait for the platform to decide whether it crossed a line. By then, the video may have already accumulated millions of views or been copied to other accounts.

Government rules are beginning to adapt to technology in certain areas. Beginning July 20, New York prohibited recording-enabled glasses inside every courthouse in the state's Unified Court System. Officials said the ban was intended to prevent people from secretly recording court proceedings in violation of state law and court rules.

Outside those controlled settings, people who do not want to be recorded are still left depending on the wearer’s judgment, a small white light, inconsistent laws, and moderation systems that usually arrive after the damage has begun.

Playing Disney music might occasionally interrupt that process. It could also do absolutely nothing. But when the alternatives are so limited, an unreliable defense may still feel better than no defense at all.

Prime Video remains one of the major streaming services in today's streaming landscape. Like its competitors, Prime Video is always looking for its next critically acclaimed Emmy contender. Since 2015, Amazon has won more than 50 Emmy Awards in various categories, including some of the most prestigious comedy and drama prizes.

Your ESP32-based DIY electronics projects could soon integrate more smoothly into your smart home. Espressif's ESP32-S31 board is now available with major upgrades in performance, wireless tech, and input.

A new humanoid robot debuted this week with a sensor-laden layer of "smart skin" designed to feel exactly where and how hard it's being touched...for industrial safety, of course.

The robot, called Gene.01, comes from Generative Bionics and debuted at AMD's Advancing AI conference in San Francisco. CNET senior video producer Jesse Orrall got hands-on time with the machine, and Orrall described the texture of the smart skin as similar to a neoprene wetsuit. (Disclosure: Mashable and CNET are both owned by the same parent company, Ziff Davis.)

Around its frame, the bot is outfitted with "full-body multimodal skin" that can sense "touch, proximity, force and temperature," according to Generative Bionics.

SEE ALSO: The more I watch the new NEO robot hand video the weirder it gets

Per CNET's reporting, the skin senses touch using two kinds of sensors working together. The first are touch sensors capable of detecting contact, as well as the precise location and amount of pressure applied. Orrall wrote that squeezing the robot's arm triggered a live rendering on a nearby screen, lighting up at the exact spot being touched and darkening as more pressure was applied.

The second sensor type handles proximity rather than direct contact. These are known in the industry as time-of-flight (ToF) sensors, which work by emitting invisible light and measuring how long it takes to reflect back — effectively letting the robot sense something (or someone) before actual contact occurs. Orrall reported that waving a hand near the sensors produced a cluster of dots on the display screen that tracked with the hand movement, fading out as the hand moved away.

The practicality of the design, according to CNET, is collision avoidance. The hope is that these features will make it safer for industrial robots to work in close proximity to humans, whether on a factory floor or elsewhere. Generative Bionics reportedly views Gene.01 as an early platform, with plans to customize the amount and placement of smart skin, as well as the robot's hands, or "end effectors," depending on a client's specific use case.

As CNET noted, sensing the world is only half the equation — the harder problem still ahead is teaching the robot to act on that sensory data in real-time, something Generative Bionics says it's continuing to develop.

Phones have become such a part of our daily lives that it's important to find ways to make them easier to use. There's always one place that can make navigating cleaner, smoother, and easier: the Home Screen. But you might not realize there are some neat features available in your system launcher, like Samsung's One UI Launcher.

When Toyota rolled out its first hybrid system in the 1997 Prius, the idea was straightforward. Let a gas engine and an electric motor trade off propulsion duties, so the car could ultimately go farther on less fuel. Almost three decades later, Toyota has stretched that same idea in two different directions inside a single car.

We've all been there. Your PC is lagging, you open up task manager to see what is going on, and the graph shows you that 95% of your RAM is in use. Switching to the process tab doesn't help; the numbers don't seem to add up.

FREE LEGO SET: Through July 31, spending $65 at Lego.com gets you a free Lego Straw Topper Set. It includes four cute silicone straw toppers, four reusable straws, and a straw cleaner.

Opens in a new window Credit: Lego Lego Straw Topper Set (pack of 4) $0
$12.99 Save $12.99 Free with $65+ purchases Shop Now

The free Lego offers at Lego.com have refreshed again. One option for the end of July would make a great back-to-school gift (or a cute stocking stuffer idea for kids, if you're thinking that far ahead): Get a free pack of four fun Lego straw toppers plus the straws themselves and a straw cleaning brush with any order of $65 or more.

The Lego Straw Topper Set includes four precious silicone buddies: a robot, a dinosaur, a cat, and an ice cream cone. The pastel straws included are much cuter and less wasteful than getting a new plastic straw at school or the drive-thru all the time.

SEE ALSO: New Lego Pokémon sets are about to be released into the wild: Pre-order Arcanine, Munchlax, and more

Back to the gift ideas thing: Now would be a smart time to grab the Lego set you've been wanting to give someone. Your $65 purchase could be one big Lego purchase or a combination of a few less expensive sets. Remember, preorders do count as a purchase that unlocks free Legos. Our favorite new Lego sets to preorder right now include the Spongebob Squarepants: Bikini Bottom set and Donkey Kong Pinball set.

Two other free Lego deals are live through the end of July: Get a free version of The Darksaber from Lego Star Wars when you purchase the Mandalorian's N1 Starfighter or get a free Spider-Man vs. Anti-Venom Heist set when you spend $40.

Ever since its release in early 2022, Valve's Steam Deck has been touted as the best handheld PC for most people and the default recommendation for anyone looking to get into handheld PC gaming, for good reason.

Many of us rely on Google Maps (or your navigation app of choice) running through Android Auto to get from point A to point B. It makes sense—navigation is one of the most fundamental features any modern car can offer, and it's only made better by Android Auto because it ditches the clunky built-in systems in favor of something familiar.

SAVE $24: As of July 28, get the Anker Prime Charging Station for $55.99 at Amazon, down from its usual price of $79.99. That's a discount of 30%.

Opens in a new window Credit: Amazon Anker Prime Charging Station $55.99 at Amazon
$79.99 Save $24.00   Get Deal

If you're the type of person who hates wrangling cables but loves to make sure all your electronics have 100% battery, you need a charging station. You can plug in multiple devices in one central location, overnight if you prefer, and wake up to a menagerie of fully-charged tech, ready to start the day. Easy, affordable, and reliable, and we've got one that's even cheaper than usual for you today, courtesy of Amazon.

As of July 28, get the Anker Prime Charging Station for $55.99 at Amazon, down from its usual price of $79.99. That's $24 off and a discount of 30%.

SEE ALSO: Amazon has knocked Soundcore C50i by Anker earbuds under $40 for a limited time — save $30

This device has six ports, so you can charge multiple devices at once, with each USB-C port supporting 100W max. When using two USB-C ports at the same time, both will offer 100W of power. That means you have the capacity to charge up to two 14-inch MacBook Pros to 50% in under 30 minutes. It can handle your phones, tablets, gaming consoles, and just about anything else you need, too.

Plus, it's super small and compact. It has safety features to help continuously monitor temperature and protect your devices while they're charging. That way you can feel comfortable about leaving all your tech to juice up when you head to bed or leave all of your devices charging while away.

This is a great way to consolidate your devices to charge them at once, all while not having to spend an arm and a leg. Swap from one cable to an entire selection of charging ports and be more efficient about filling those batteries.

SAVE $150.00: The Shark PowerDetect Pet Plus Clean & Empty cordless stick vacuum is on sale at Amazon for $399.99, down from the list price of $549.99. That's a 27% discount.

Opens in a new window Credit: Shark Shark PowerDetect Pet Plus Clean & Empty cordless stick vacuum $399.99 at Amazon
$549.99 Save $150   Get Deal

These days, we have robot vacuums and robot lawn mowers to take care of keeping underfoot areas clean and manicured. But if you prefer to vacuum on your own, we have models with excellent features that make things easier. Check out this deal at Amazon.

As of July 28, the Shark PowerDetect Pet Plus Clean & Empty cordless stick vacuum is on sale at Amazon for $399.99, down from the list price of $549.99 at Shark. That's a 27% discount.

When it comes to cordless stick vacuums, suction power matters. The Shark PowerDetect Pet Plus Clean & Empty doesn't mess around. This model is designed to tackle stubborn pet hair that loves to get stuck on carpet and furniture. Shark included a flexible crevice tool and the brand's Furfins tool to help clean pet hair in any location of your home.

Another major benefit of the Shark PowerDetect Pet Plus Clean & Empty cordless stick vacuum is the self-emptying base. Set the stick vacuum back on its charging base, and all debris from the vacuum will whisk off to the base. You'll need to empty the base every 45 days or so, but that's minimal effort compared to emptying the debris canister after each vacuum.

SEE ALSO: Dreame's Matrix10 Ultra robot vacuum and mop is $300 off at Amazon — buy now for under $1,500

Espeically great for homes with pets is the Shark odor neutralizer technology. This fragranced puck sits on the self-emptying base to provide a fresh scent. If you're not one for scents in the house, you can easily leave the cartridge out.

If you could use a vacuum upgrade, consider today's sale price on the Shark PowerDetect Pet Plus Clean & Empty cordless stick vacuum. It's a powerful model with great features for pet owners, and it's on sale for under $400.

Luxury SUVs have become increasingly expensive, with many new compact models now pushing well beyond the $50,000 mark before options. That has made the lightly used market especially appealing, where three-year-old examples can deliver virtually the same technology, comfort, and performance for thousands less than their original sticker price.

SAVE $100: As of July 28, the new Dyson V8 Cyclone cordless vacuum and Car Cleaning Kit bundle is on sale for $299.99. That's $100 off the vacuum's MSRP of $399.99.

Opens in a new window Credit: Dyson Dyson V8 Cyclone + Car Cleaning Kit $299.99 at Dyson
$399.99 Save $100   Get Deal

I test vacuums for a living and am a Dyson truther in most instances. However, I had never backed the Dyson V8 as the best budget stick vacuum — if you wanted to spend no more than $300 on a vacuum, I'd quickly tell you to buy a Shark stick vacuum that comes with a self-emptying dock instead. My mind changed when Dyson released the revamped Dyson V8 Cyclone in June. Its launch price of $399.99 was already practical, but as of July 28, you can save $100 and grab the new Dyson V8 Cyclone for just $299.99 at Dyson's website.

Funnily enough, the old Dyson V8 is also on sale for $299.99 at Amazon. So let's compare the specs while their prices are identical:

SEE ALSO: The Dyson PencilVac Fluffycones weighs nothing and fits everywhere. Don't get me started on the double lasers.

The old Dyson V8 has 115 Air Watts of suction power. The new Dyson V8 Cyclone has 150 Air Watts of suction power — the same as my favorite Dyson vacuum, the V12 Detect Slim. Dyson itself has confirmed that the Cyclone is the most powerful V8 model ever. The V8 Cyclone also has three suction modes compared to the old V8's two.

Battery life has also improved. The Dyson V8 Cyclone can clean for up to 60 minutes on one charge while the old V8 maxed out at 40 minutes. Despite a more powerful motor and more powerful battery, the V8 Cyclone only weighs 0.1 ounces more than the old V8. They both have 0.14 gallon dust bins.

As if we needed any more proof that the V8 Cyclone stretches your $299.99 further, it also comes with more attachments than the old V8 at Amazon. You'll get Dyson's stick vacuum car cleaning kit that includes a crevice tool, extension hose, stubborn dirt brush, and mini soft dusting brush. The other V8 only comes with the crevice tool. Plus, a self-emptying dock for the V8 Cyclone is coming in August.