Blogroll

Most of the documentation I deal with now is digital, which means it can be copied and searched at will. Unfortunately, plenty of important things do require paper documentation—a major inconvenience compared to digital.

AI can do a lot of impressive things, and connecting an LLM to your smart home can make it much smarter. It can also make it pretty dumb, too, if you decide that you're going to use it to give a smart bulb a personality.

If you’ve tried using Claude to learn to code and walked away feeling like you just witnessed a magic trick rather than actually learned something, you’re not alone. Without structure, AI coding tools default to doing the work for you—you end up with hundreds of lines of code without understanding the algorithm or the logic behind it.

For the longest time, I used to ssh into my home servers and then use top or htop to check their resource usage. To keep an eye on my Docker containers, I would run Docker stats, I would run docker stats or docker ps. I'd use basic shell commands to check disk and network usage too. Or systemctl to view systemd services. It gets pretty annoying when you have all your services spread across multiple little servers. One of my co-workers told me about Beszel, and it has saved me from all that monitoring headache.

Andy Serkis isn't done with Middle-earth just yet.

The upcoming prequel film The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum sees Serkis pulling double duty — more so than he already does in the dual part of Gollum/Sméagol. On top of reprising that iconic role, he's also stepping into the director's chair, making him the only person aside from Peter Jackson to helm a live-action Lord of the Rings movie.

SEE ALSO: Andy Serkis on 'Animal Farm,' George Orwell, and AI in Hollywood

Before The Hunt for Gollum's production gets underway in New Zealand, Serkis spoke with Mashable Entertainment Reporter Belen Edwards about what viewers could expect from the film.

"The joy of [The Hunt for Gollum] is that it's entirely its own story, but it fits perfectly into the lore, the tone, the feel of the Middle-earth films that were created by Peter Jackson 25 years ago," Serkis said.

According to Serkis, the film "sits between The Hobbit trilogy and the Lord of the Rings." It will follow Gandalf (Ian McKellen) and Aragorn's (Jamie Dornan, replacing Viggo Mortensen) search for Gollum in the lead-up to the War of the Ring. J.R.R. Tolkien wrote about this hunt in The Fellowship of the Ring and the trilogy's Appendices, and Jackson's films briefly mention it.

SEE ALSO: Everything we know about 'The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum'

The Hunt for Gollum is the latest step in Warner Bros. Pictures' expansion of their Middle-earth titles. 2025 saw the release of anime film The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim. Then, on March 25, Warner Bros. announced The Lord of the Rings: Shadow of the Past (working title), a Lord of the Rings sequel written by Philippa Boyens, Tolkien superfan Stephen Colbert, and his son Peter McGee.

The deluge of Lord of the Rings titles might raise alarm bells about the dilution of a beloved franchise. For Serkis' part, this isn't the case with The Hunt for Gollum.

"The story, and therefore how we see the story, is different and unique to this particular tale," Serkis said. "It's not just a nostalgia film. We're seeing plenty of those, and laying heavily into the nostalgia and the things that we loved about those movies of 25 and 30 years ago. [The Hunt for Gollum] adheres to that world, but it certainly has a freshness and a newness in terms of the actual story."

The newness also extends to the cast. The Hunt for Gollum features the return of several familiar faces: Serkis, McKellen, Elijah Wood, and Lee Pace reprise their roles from the Lord of the Rings and Hobbit trilogies. However, the film also invites several newcomers into Middle-earth. Kate Winslet and Leo Woodall play Marigol and Halvard, two characters who aren't named in Tolkien's original novels or films, while Jamie Dornan takes over the role of Aragorn from Viggo Mortensen.

"We're calling him Strider in our movie. He is at a different point in his journey, so he is slightly different to the Aragorn that we see later on," Serkis explained. "It's a version of himself that's been out in the wilderness as a Dúnedain Ranger. I'll leave it at that for the moment, but Jamie is perfect for this part of the journey of the character."

For more from Serkis, including his favorite Lord of the Rings meme and his reflections on Andor, check out the full Say More interview above.

The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum hits theaters in 2027.

The first 1GB hard drive was released by IBM in 1980. The IBM 3380 Direct Access Storage Device (DASD) was enormous by today’s standards, weighing about 64lbs and costing ~$50,000. We then waited 27 years for the first 1TB hard drive, the Deskstar 7K1000 from Hitachi, which came out in 2007.

When a top role suddenly opens, organizations are forced to act fast. Stability becomes the priority, and appointing an interim leader often feels like the safest move. But without clear intent, that quick fix can trigger confusion and long-term value loss. Here’s how to approach the interim role with discipline from the start. Define the […]

175175

The likes of Audi and BMW still dominate the sports sedan conversation, offering polished performance and premium appeal. But as the segment has evolved, many of those cars have drifted toward refinement over raw driver engagement, leaving a gap for something more focused and a little less conventional.

There's a near-endless sea of free and paid photo editing tools at your disposal. While many of them offer powerful features that can completely transform an image, most of the time you only need the app to tweak a few small details. For that kind of quick-and-dirty editing, I've found myself using the built-in Windows Photos app almost exclusively. If you've been ignoring it, allow me to convince you that it might be worth another look.

It's no secret that Google is cracking down against "sideloading" Android apps—which is to say, installing apps from outside the Play Store. Google Play Protect has thrown up the "harmful app blocked" warning for a long time now, but it was simple enough to ignore the warning and install the app anyway. However, in the past few months, Play Protect has blocked app installations completely. This is what you can do to get past Play Protect blocks.

Are you on the fence between using your phone as a 3D scanner or buying a professional 3D scanner? I’ve always wanted a 3D scanner, but I also thought my phone would be just as good. I scanned the same object with both a professional 3D scanner and my iPhone 17 Pro and printed the results—and they were not what I expected.

It's Monday morning, and an "updated" copy of an Excel workbook is sitting in your inbox. But when you open it, it's often impossible to tell what's changed. Instead of playing a game of spot the difference, use these built-in Excel tools to highlight differences in seconds.

A good homelab setup doesn't need to consist of all flashy, exciting applications. The longer I've used my homelab, the more I've come to view the apps that sit idle in the background as the most important services I host.

Narwal’s latest Flow 2 robot vacuum packs a lot of new features compared to its predecessor. With better suction performance, a higher-temperature mopping system with real-time self cleaning, and better navigation, the Flow 2 is a great upgrade to an already fantastic robot vacuum/mop.

Best Lego Star Wars Day deals at a glance: C-3PO $111.99 (save $28) Get Deal Brick-Built Star Wars Logo $47.99 (save $12) Get Deal The Mandalorian Helmet $55.99 (save $13.91) Get Deal

Lego Star Wars Day (aka May 4th) is finally here, and Lego is dropping incredible new releases (including the Lego Star Wars The Mandalorian’s N-1 Starfighter), exclusive rewards for members, free gifts, and much more to celebrate.

If you want the quick rundown before you start scrolling through pages of bricks, here's a summary of the best offers running between now and May 6:

• Free gifts with purchase: It's pretty un-Lego-like to drop discounts across its entire catalog. Usually, the best way to get a deal is to buy whatever product comes with the best free gift. The good news for this year is that the company is stacking those free gifts on top of one another. If you buy the new Lego Star Wars The Mandalorian’s N-1 Starfighter, you automatically get a free The Mandalorian and Grogu Display set. If your cart hits $160 in Star Wars merchandise, it will throw in a free The Darksaber build. You can also grab a free The Razor Crest Mini-Build if you spend $40 on select smaller sets.

• Direct discounts: That said, some items are on sale, including the C-3PO, Brick-Built Star Wars Logo, and The Mandalorian Helmet.

• New product drops: As of May 1, Lego Insiders get early access to the brand-new Lego Star Wars The Mandalorian’s N-1 Starfighter. If you aren't an Insider, you'll have to wait for general access on May 4.

• Quadruple the points: You can rack up 4x Insiders points on big-ticket items like the AT-ST Walker, Jabba's Sail Barge, and the TIE Interceptor. The brand is also offering 2x points on dozens of other sets.

• Rewards: If you already have points saved up, you can redeem 1,800 of them for an exclusive The Mandalorian's N-1 Starfighter poster by Joe Hogan. You can also enter sweepstakes to win special items, like a signed N-1 Starfighter set or a Lego Star Wars Bundle and Lego e-Gift Card.

TL;DR: FastestVPN is $29.99 for lifetime access (reg. $360), covering up to 10 devices with strong encryption, fast speeds, and no ongoing fees.

Opens in a new window Credit: FastestVPN FastestVPN: Lifetime Subscription (10 Devices) $29.99
$360 Save $330.01   Get Deal

Between public Wi-Fi, streaming restrictions, and constant tracking, the internet isn’t exactly low-key anymore. A FastestVPN lifetime subscription is currently $29.99 (reg. $360), and it covers up to 10 devices at once.

That’s your laptop, phone, tablet — maybe even your TV or router — protected under one account.

Mashable Deals Be the first to know! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Loading... Sign Me Up By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Thanks for signing up!

The basics are what you’d expect: 256-bit encryption, a built-in NAT firewall, and protection against ads and malware. There are also 600+ servers globally, so you can connect from different regions for streaming or just to keep your browsing private.

Speed is a big factor here, too. With optimized servers and modern protocols like WireGuard and OpenVPN, it’s built to handle streaming and downloads without turning everything into a buffering mess.

Now, the main concern: privacy. Many VPNs claim “no logs,” and it’s fair to be skeptical. In this case, FastestVPN has had its no-logs policy independently audited and is fairly transparent about how data is handled, which helps build some trust.

For a one-time $29.99 (reg. $360), this FastestVPN offer is a practical option if you want long-term coverage without ongoing costs.

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections.

TL;DR: Voibe turns your voice into text instantly on your Mac for a one-time $49.99 (reg. $199).

Opens in a new window Credit: Essence AI Voibe Lifetime Subscription $49.99
$199 Save $149.01   Get Deal

There’s a good chance typing is slowing you down more than you realize. If it seems like your brain moves faster than your fingers, you’re not wrong. Typing is often the bottleneck. That’s the problem Voibe is trying to fix.

Voibe is a voice dictation tool built specifically for Mac that lets you speak naturally and see your words appear instantly — no lag, no waiting, no weird formatting cleanup after. You hold a key, talk, release, and move on.

Mashable Deals Be the first to know! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Loading... Sign Me Up By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Thanks for signing up!

The biggest difference here is that everything runs locally on your Mac. It uses OpenAI’s Whisper model but processes your voice directly on your Mac, so your audio never leaves your machine. That’s a privacy win and why it feels so fast. No internet dependency translates to no delays.

It also handles real-world speech surprisingly well. Accents, technical terms, natural phrasing — it’s designed to keep up without forcing you to talk like a robot. And since it works in basically any app where you can type, it fits right into your existing workflow without issue.

Is it for everyone? Not really. If you don’t like speaking your thoughts out loud, it might not click. But if your days involve writing emails, notes, or content, the time savings can be real.

Get lifetime access to Voibe for a one-time $49.99 (reg. $199).

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Love them or hate them, the Kardashians are cultural drivers, and a new book releasing tomorrow dissects why.

Dekonstructing the Kardashians: A New Media Manifesto is written by psychotherapist MJ Corey, who runs the Instagram account, Kardashian Kolloquium. When she discovered the Kardashians while in grad school, Corey was so struck by their content and found it uncanny. Her sister told her to read postmodern theory, and Corey deep-dived into self-study and started documenting it online. Now, she has nearly 50,000 followers, helps run the Kardashian Data Koalition, and has become a premier Kardashian intellectual. 

SEE ALSO: What is OnlyFans?

"Kardashian intellectual" may sound like an oxymoron, but as Dekonstructing the Kardashians demonstrates, it's important for us to examine pop culture. There must be reasons why something is popular, after all. "I don't psychoanalyze the Kardashians, but if anything, they might hold a mirror to the rest of us," Corey said in an interview with Mashable. 

The Kardashians trace culture with their narratives, she said, and it actually began with sex work. 

The infamous sex tape

Cast your memory all the way back to 2007, when Kim Kardashian's sex tape with singer Ray J was leaked. Kim rose to fame, and Keeping Up With the Kardashians (KUWTK) premiered months later. 

There's a current legal battle between Kardashian and Ray J, which may shed new light on why the tape was made and how it was released. But regardless, whereas some may have been embarrassed and shied away from the public eye after such an invasion of privacy, Kim did the opposite. She refused to be ashamed. 

"Why did you make a sex tape?" Kim's sister, Kourtney, asked in the very first episode of KUWTK ahead of an upcoming talk show appearance. 

"Because I was horny and I felt like it," Kim said.

A reason why people are angry at the Kardashians is that they made money from the tape instead of living in shame or disassociating from it, Corey said. 

"People have a different feeling towards female icons that are tragic or humiliated than the ones that are like, 'No, I'm good, I'm gonna make money from it,'" Corey said. "It's another nuance that people have been forced to sit with when it comes to the Kardashians and their relationship to sex — that the tape didn't break them."

And the sex tape was far from the only time the Kardashians associated themselves with sex — and sex work — especially in the early years of their fame. In the first season of KUWTK alone, members of the family: played on a stripper pole, hired a porn performer to babysit the Jenner sisters, participated in a Girls Gone Wild photoshoot, and also shot photos for Playboy. 

When we break down the story of the Kardashians intellectually, Corey said, we look at cultural appropriation of race and ethnicity. But in the beginning, they appropriated sex work, as well. Corey spoke with a sex worker who wanted to remain anonymous, who believed Kim is a sex worker, though Kim would never call it that. In Kim's time in the spotlight, she's stigmatized the profession while fully idealizing, glamorizing, and profiting from sex workers' aesthetics, Corey said.

When researching for this book, "it was impossible to ignore this middle-class woman's fascination with sex work," she said of Kim in the early days of KUWTK.

Kim Kardashian and OnlyFans

Kim K isn't on OnlyFans, but there is a connection between the two. As Corey writes in Dekonstructing the Kardashians: 

"Sexual accessibility is, apparently, most alluring when there's a sense that no woman is profiting from it, which is probably at least one reason why the Kardashians…became more reviled the richer they got, and also why people would one day rag on the sex industry social media website OnlyFans, which came out in 2016 in the thick of Kardashian-driven influencer culture and offered a space for many sex workers to own the means of their production."

There's a larger discourse beyond the Kardashians around OnlyFans, its place in culture, and its influence on women and how they view and potentially commodify their bodies. "I've just noticed in the larger discourse, [shaming] of women who are entrepreneurial on their OnlyFans accounts. There's a similar shaming that people throw at the Kardashians sometimes for making money on their sexuality." 

"And I think that it's threatening to see that women can be independent from men," Corey added.

The difference between Kim Kardashian and the typical OnlyFans model, however, is fame, money, and access. Kim K seemingly gets a pass to post whatever she wants; this is a complaint sex workers and other sex-adjacent Instagram users have told Mashable in recent years. While Kim is boosted in our algorithms, non-famous people are shadowbanned — deprioritized — if not banned entirely. 

How the Kardashians won culture

The influence of the Kar-Jenners is undeniable, and in her book, Corey follows the lineage between a variety of American icons — like the Disney brand and Marilyn Monroe — and what they have in common with the family.

Every icon she references in the book typically evokes anxiety about race, death, or sex. This is even true of Mickey Mouse, who has, for example, sparked conversations about how the Disney mascot is racially coded.

"The Kardashians, in a really high-scale way, and in a way that will ensure their legacy, evoke all of these anxieties that all the other icons that came before also have," Corey said. "It just tells us that there's something about us that craves, that is drawn to it, is agitated by it, and that's why they also are so popular, because they play these things out for us at such scale, so relentlessly."

Because there are so many Kar-Jenners, the machine never stops, Corey continued. The family has become figures of catharsis, or release. There are touchpoints, like the SKIMS pubic hair underwear release last fall, that allow us to ask: How do we feel about that?

We're really trying to figure out what kind of society we want to live in, Corey said, and the Kardashians offer us opportunities to chew on and try to sort it out. Everything they do, at this point, conjures up some discourse — so much so that Corey already wants to write another book.

When The Audacity star Sarah Goldberg first met with series creator Jonathan Glatzer, he summed up the show in an unexpected fashion: The real-life tech titans whom The Audacity skewers are so focused on creating immortality that they can't face the fact that everyone — including them — has, at some point in their lives, pooped their pants.

SEE ALSO: 'The Audacity' tears Silicon Valley a new one: Review

That juxtaposition — a "denial of our base humanity," as Goldberg described it in a Zoom call with Mashable — attracted her to The Audacity's warped take on Silicon Valley.

In The Audacity's ensemble of tech founders, Goldberg's Dr. JoAnne Felder is the odd person out. She's a therapist to the Valley's "billionaire man-children," a renter in a sea of obscenely wealthy homeowners who don't care if their Napa house burns down, because they have several other homes to run back to.

Due to her outsider status, you might think JoAnne would serve as The Audacity's voice of reason. But by the end of the show's first episode, it's clear she's willing to bend the rules for personal gain just as much as her clients. One of them, Hypergnosis CEO Duncan Park (Billy Magnussen), learns she uses confidential client information to conduct insider trading.

"In this completely morally bankrupt world that JoAnne finds herself in, she feels like her tiny little transgressions are harmless, or even justified," Goldberg said.

Sarah Goldberg and Billy Magnussen in "The Audacity." Credit: Ed Araquel / AMC

Coming into The Audacity, Goldberg wanted a "big departure" from her Emmy–nominated role as Barry's struggling actor Sally Reed. When she first read for Sally, she felt she knew that character right away. For JoAnne, Goldberg was more drawn to her rhythm, an element that usually pulls her towards roles.

In her professional life, JoAnne's rhythm is slow and intentional. Goldberg describes her using silence "as a tool," wielding it to create space so her clients can open up... and give her valuable information information in the process.

"I didn't feel huge pressure to do major research and become this really qualified therapist, because that ship has sailed for JoAnne," Goldberg laughed. "It's sunk!"

Rhythm-wise, JoAnne's personal life is another story. As she weathers blackmail from Duncan, the possibility of losing her home, and her thorny relationship with son Orson (Everett Blunck), she grows more erratic. She drives off the road, snaps at every inconvenience (many self-inflicted), and browses the web for guns during session with clients. She's a picture of volatility, her blunt bob swaying with each panicked snap.

SEE ALSO: 'The Audacity' throws shade at Apple without ever saying its name

"It's a real cheat, but honestly, the hair really helped me. I found myself gesticulating a lot, and there's this staccato quality to her that was born out of the hair," Goldberg said. "[Key Hair Stylist] Sanna [Seppanen] told me, 'I'm gonna give you hair so great, you don't have to act.' She was not wrong."

While JoAnne differs wildly from Sally Reed, Barry fans may catch glimpses of her in JoAnne's increasingly nervous, occasionally explosive interactions with others. Like with Sally's decline, JoAnne is also a woman fraying at the edges.

"I love a frayer. I'm attracted to fraying people," Goldberg said.

She's also attracted to the dichotomy between The Audacity's characters' external and internal lives.

"So many people in this world are similar to Barry in some ways," she said. "They're living two lives, one with a very thick veneer to perform who they need to be in their business or job."

Goldberg continued: "I'm always interested in that duality. I'm interested in how we do it day to day. Why, when someone calls you, does your voice go high? Why do you speak one way when you're ordering your coffee, and then when you're in the doctor's office, it's different? I'm always fascinated by our external behaviors and what's going on underneath."

Sarah Goldberg in "The Audacity." Credit: David Moir / AMC

Goldberg is a self-described "technophobe." She has no apps and no social media, and she wasn't incredibly familiar with Silicon Valley prior to filming The Audacity. However, even before working on the show, she had been reading up on the rise of AI, especially how it pertains to the entertainment industry.

"I'm hoping that this doomsday feeling that was setting in is overblown. I don't know that it is," she said. "My hope I always hold on to is that television and film didn't kill theater, and I think that we're always going to crave a kind of connection and nuance that's not going to be available through AI."

The Audacity tackles AI through a storyline that JoAnne hasn't figured into much yet, one where Martin Phister (Simon Helberg) is essentially raising and nurturing an AI child. As the show goes on, he sees potential for it as a therapeutic tool that can do good, like when it listens to Deputy Under Secretary of Veterans' Affairs Tom Ruffage (Rob Corddry) about his wartime experiences.

"The AI aspect of the show is being developed with such purity and passion and focus. Seeing what happens if it falls into the wrong hands is where it all gets so frustrating," said Goldberg.

That frustration carries over to real life for Goldberg as well.

"I feel very resistant to it," she said. "My instincts as an animal are like, 'Where are we heading?' and it makes me quite uncomfortable. At the same time, I'm trying to keep a little bit of realism. We can't avoid the march of change, right? These things are happening, so how do we move forward productively?"

That's the question Glatzer, Goldberg, and The Audacity keep coming back to. What is the road map forward for humankind as it keeps dehumanizing itself? JoAnne, with her proximity to the reality-warping world of Silicon Valley, proves a perfect, if troubling case study.

Goldberg believes that JoAnne was once an idealist hoping to help her clients, but upon moving to Silicon Valley, she grew more "jaded and corrupted." Still, even in her early days as a therapist, she wasn't totally incorruptible.

"There was something in her that drew her to this world," Goldberg noted.

JoAnne's descent into corruption highlights Glatzer and The Audacity's central thesis about the future of humanity.

"What does it take to lose your humanity, and can you get it back?" asked Goldberg.

"There was an easier version of this show where [Glatzer] steps back, points the finger, and goes, 'Here's this small group of sociopaths who are making so much money doing terrible things,'" Goldberg said. "Actually, he chose the harder task of asking bigger questions about our moral compass as a species. What's innate in all of us? What creates this bad decision-making, and once you develop the tech that commodifies it, where does it go? He really gets down to the fact that these people didn't invent human behavior. They're exploiting and commodifying it, but the seeds are in all of us to, say, invade each other's privacy. He holds a mirror up to that in a way that I think is really brave."

New episodes of The Audacity are available to stream Sundays on AMC+, and air at 9 p.m. ET on AMC.

Everyone knows children are capable of savagery at the best of times, but Jack Thorne's Lord of the Flies — adapted from William Golding's famous 1954 novel — really ups the stakes.

The four-episode BBC miniseries, now streaming on Netflix, follows a group of British schoolchildren stranded on an island after a plane crash. Although they're semi-organised at first, the relationship between elected chief Ralph (Winston Sawyers) and lead hunter Jack (Lox Pratt) eventually breaks down, with things quickly escalating into violence.

But what happens at the end of the miniseries, what does it all mean, and how does it compare to the end of the novel? Let's unpack.

SEE ALSO: The 20 best Netflix TV shows of 2025 How does the Lord of the Flies show end? Lox Pratt as Jack in "Lord of the Flies." Credit: BBC / Eleven / J Redza

In the final episode of Lord of the Flies, Ralph is outnumbered and in danger. Following the deaths of his allies Simon (Ike Talbut) and Piggy (David McKenna), the former chief spends the last part of episode 4 on the run from Jack and his tribe, who appear determined to hunt him to the death.

When Ralph hides out in the forest, the boys set a fire to try and smoke him out. Just as he's ready to give up, he encounters two actual adults who have landed on the beach in their small boat. They've seen the smoke and come to help.

One of the adults (Tom Goodman-Hill), not realising that Ralph was on the verge of being murdered, chastises him for not knowing how many boys there are on the island.

"I would have thought you could put on a better show than that," he barks, in peak cold British fashion.

"It was like that at first," Ralph responds. "Before things... we were together then."

"Let's get you boys out to the boat," says the man, leading Ralph away. In the background, the other kids put down their spears and slowly follow.

How does William Golding's book end? Winston Sawyers as Ralph in "Lord of the Flies." Credit: BBC / Eleven / J Redza

The show is fairly faithful to the book. The novel also ends with the boys being rescued as Ralph is hunted, and there's a similar scene in which a naval officer chastises Ralph because he expects more from a group of British boys.

The book, like the TV show, ends with us knowing that the surviving boys are safe. What we don't know is what the consequences of their actions on the island will be, or what will happen to them when they get back home.

What does the ending of Lord of the Flies mean? Lox Pratt as Jack in "Lord of the Flies." Credit: BBC / Eleven / J Redza

The reason we don't see what's next for the boys after they leave the island is, presumably, because it's not the main point of the story. Like the novel, Thorne's miniseries is really about how quickly society can break down when you remove its basic structures.

As Ralph says to the naval office at the end, "It was like that at first." But if Ralph and Piggy are representative of order, Jack's allure of chaos and savagery quickly proves too strong for the others to resist.

The naval office's reference to "British boys" and what he expects of them shows that he thinks Western society, in particular, is in some way too enlightened to devolve into violence. Lord of the Flies is a clear rejection of that idea.

Lord of the Flies is streaming now on Netflix and BBC iPlayer.